Cargando…

Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56–60

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research is to implement and reliably evaluate primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in an established and routinely running organised, large-scale population-based screening programme. PARTICIPANTS: Resident women in the Stockholm/Gotland region of Sweden, aged 56–...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamin, Helena, Eklund, Carina, Elfström, Klara Miriam, Carlsten-Thor, Agneta, Hortlund, Maria, Elfgren, Kristina, Törnberg, Sven, Dillner, Joakim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014788
_version_ 1783286277989203968
author Lamin, Helena
Eklund, Carina
Elfström, Klara Miriam
Carlsten-Thor, Agneta
Hortlund, Maria
Elfgren, Kristina
Törnberg, Sven
Dillner, Joakim
author_facet Lamin, Helena
Eklund, Carina
Elfström, Klara Miriam
Carlsten-Thor, Agneta
Hortlund, Maria
Elfgren, Kristina
Törnberg, Sven
Dillner, Joakim
author_sort Lamin, Helena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research is to implement and reliably evaluate primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in an established and routinely running organised, large-scale population-based screening programme. PARTICIPANTS: Resident women in the Stockholm/Gotland region of Sweden, aged 56–60 years were randomised to either (1) screening with cervical cytology, with HPV test in triage of low-grade cytological abnormalities (old policy) or (2) screening with HPV testing, with cytology in triage of HPV positives (new policy). OUTCOME: The primary evaluation was the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). RESULTS: During January 2012–May 2014, the organised screening programme sent 42 752 blinded invitations with a prebooked appointment time to the women in the target age group. 7325 women attended in the HPV policy arm and 7438 women attended in the cytology arm. In the new policy, the population HPV prevalence was 5.5%, using an accredited HPV test (Cobas 4800). HPV16 prevalence was 1.0% (73/7325) and HPV18 prevalence was 0.3% (22/7325). In the HPV policy arm, 78/405 (19%) HPV-positive women were also cytology positive. There were 19 cases of CIN2+ in histopathology, all among women who were both HPV positive and cytology positive. The positive predictive value for CIN2+ in this group was 33.3% (19/57). In the cytology policy, 153 women were cytology positive and there were 18 cases of CIN2+ in histopathology. Both the total number of cervical biopsies and the number of cervical biopsies with benign histopathology were much lower in thepositive predictive value policy (49 benign, 87 total vs 105 benign, 132 total). CONCLUSION: Primary HPV screening had a similar detection rate for CIN2+ as cytology-based screening, already before follow-up of HPV-positive, cytology-negative women with new HPV test and referral of women with persistence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01511328.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5729984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57299842017-12-19 Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56–60 Lamin, Helena Eklund, Carina Elfström, Klara Miriam Carlsten-Thor, Agneta Hortlund, Maria Elfgren, Kristina Törnberg, Sven Dillner, Joakim BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research is to implement and reliably evaluate primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in an established and routinely running organised, large-scale population-based screening programme. PARTICIPANTS: Resident women in the Stockholm/Gotland region of Sweden, aged 56–60 years were randomised to either (1) screening with cervical cytology, with HPV test in triage of low-grade cytological abnormalities (old policy) or (2) screening with HPV testing, with cytology in triage of HPV positives (new policy). OUTCOME: The primary evaluation was the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). RESULTS: During January 2012–May 2014, the organised screening programme sent 42 752 blinded invitations with a prebooked appointment time to the women in the target age group. 7325 women attended in the HPV policy arm and 7438 women attended in the cytology arm. In the new policy, the population HPV prevalence was 5.5%, using an accredited HPV test (Cobas 4800). HPV16 prevalence was 1.0% (73/7325) and HPV18 prevalence was 0.3% (22/7325). In the HPV policy arm, 78/405 (19%) HPV-positive women were also cytology positive. There were 19 cases of CIN2+ in histopathology, all among women who were both HPV positive and cytology positive. The positive predictive value for CIN2+ in this group was 33.3% (19/57). In the cytology policy, 153 women were cytology positive and there were 18 cases of CIN2+ in histopathology. Both the total number of cervical biopsies and the number of cervical biopsies with benign histopathology were much lower in thepositive predictive value policy (49 benign, 87 total vs 105 benign, 132 total). CONCLUSION: Primary HPV screening had a similar detection rate for CIN2+ as cytology-based screening, already before follow-up of HPV-positive, cytology-negative women with new HPV test and referral of women with persistence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01511328. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5729984/ /pubmed/28566363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014788 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Lamin, Helena
Eklund, Carina
Elfström, Klara Miriam
Carlsten-Thor, Agneta
Hortlund, Maria
Elfgren, Kristina
Törnberg, Sven
Dillner, Joakim
Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56–60
title Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56–60
title_full Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56–60
title_fullStr Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56–60
title_full_unstemmed Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56–60
title_short Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56–60
title_sort randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56–60
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014788
work_keys_str_mv AT laminhelena randomisedhealthcarepolicyevaluationoforganisedprimaryhumanpapillomavirusscreeningofwomenaged5660
AT eklundcarina randomisedhealthcarepolicyevaluationoforganisedprimaryhumanpapillomavirusscreeningofwomenaged5660
AT elfstromklaramiriam randomisedhealthcarepolicyevaluationoforganisedprimaryhumanpapillomavirusscreeningofwomenaged5660
AT carlstenthoragneta randomisedhealthcarepolicyevaluationoforganisedprimaryhumanpapillomavirusscreeningofwomenaged5660
AT hortlundmaria randomisedhealthcarepolicyevaluationoforganisedprimaryhumanpapillomavirusscreeningofwomenaged5660
AT elfgrenkristina randomisedhealthcarepolicyevaluationoforganisedprimaryhumanpapillomavirusscreeningofwomenaged5660
AT tornbergsven randomisedhealthcarepolicyevaluationoforganisedprimaryhumanpapillomavirusscreeningofwomenaged5660
AT dillnerjoakim randomisedhealthcarepolicyevaluationoforganisedprimaryhumanpapillomavirusscreeningofwomenaged5660