Cargando…

What is best practice in sex and relationship education? A synthesis of evidence, including stakeholders’ views

OBJECTIVES: Sex and relationship education (SRE) is regarded as vital to improving young people’s sexual health, but a third of schools in England lacks good SRE and government guidance is outdated. We aimed to identify what makes SRE programmes effective, acceptable, sustainable and capable of fait...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pound, Pandora, Denford, Sarah, Shucksmith, Janet, Tanton, Clare, Johnson, Anne M, Owen, Jenny, Hutten, Rebecca, Mohan, Leanne, Bonell, Chris, Abraham, Charles, Campbell, Rona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28669970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014791
_version_ 1783286283378884608
author Pound, Pandora
Denford, Sarah
Shucksmith, Janet
Tanton, Clare
Johnson, Anne M
Owen, Jenny
Hutten, Rebecca
Mohan, Leanne
Bonell, Chris
Abraham, Charles
Campbell, Rona
author_facet Pound, Pandora
Denford, Sarah
Shucksmith, Janet
Tanton, Clare
Johnson, Anne M
Owen, Jenny
Hutten, Rebecca
Mohan, Leanne
Bonell, Chris
Abraham, Charles
Campbell, Rona
author_sort Pound, Pandora
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Sex and relationship education (SRE) is regarded as vital to improving young people’s sexual health, but a third of schools in England lacks good SRE and government guidance is outdated. We aimed to identify what makes SRE programmes effective, acceptable, sustainable and capable of faithful implementation. DESIGN: This is a synthesis of findings from five research packages that we conducted (practitioner interviews, case study investigation, National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, review of reviews and qualitative synthesis). We also gained feedback on our research from stakeholder consultations. SETTINGS: Primary research and stakeholder consultations were conducted in the UK. Secondary research draws on studies worldwide. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that school-based SRE and school-linked sexual health services can be effective at improving sexual health. We found professional consensus that good programmes start in primary school. Professionals and young people agreed that good programmes are age-appropriate, interactive and take place in a safe environment. Some young women reported preferring single-sex classes, but young men appeared to want mixed classes. Young people and professionals agreed that SRE should take a ‘life skills’ approach and not focus on abstinence. Young people advocated a ‘sex-positive’ approach but reported this was lacking. Young people and professionals agreed that SRE should discuss risks, but young people indicated that approaches to risk need revising. Professionals felt teachers should be involved in SRE delivery, but many young people reported disliking having their teachers deliver SRE and we found that key messages could become lost when interpreted by teachers. The divergence between young people and professionals was echoed by stakeholders. We developed criteria for best practice based on the evidence. CONCLUSIONS: We identified key features of effective and acceptable SRE. Our best practice criteria can be used to evaluate existing programmes, contribute to the development of new programmes and inform consultations around statutory SRE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5730004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57300042017-12-19 What is best practice in sex and relationship education? A synthesis of evidence, including stakeholders’ views Pound, Pandora Denford, Sarah Shucksmith, Janet Tanton, Clare Johnson, Anne M Owen, Jenny Hutten, Rebecca Mohan, Leanne Bonell, Chris Abraham, Charles Campbell, Rona BMJ Open Sexual Health OBJECTIVES: Sex and relationship education (SRE) is regarded as vital to improving young people’s sexual health, but a third of schools in England lacks good SRE and government guidance is outdated. We aimed to identify what makes SRE programmes effective, acceptable, sustainable and capable of faithful implementation. DESIGN: This is a synthesis of findings from five research packages that we conducted (practitioner interviews, case study investigation, National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, review of reviews and qualitative synthesis). We also gained feedback on our research from stakeholder consultations. SETTINGS: Primary research and stakeholder consultations were conducted in the UK. Secondary research draws on studies worldwide. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that school-based SRE and school-linked sexual health services can be effective at improving sexual health. We found professional consensus that good programmes start in primary school. Professionals and young people agreed that good programmes are age-appropriate, interactive and take place in a safe environment. Some young women reported preferring single-sex classes, but young men appeared to want mixed classes. Young people and professionals agreed that SRE should take a ‘life skills’ approach and not focus on abstinence. Young people advocated a ‘sex-positive’ approach but reported this was lacking. Young people and professionals agreed that SRE should discuss risks, but young people indicated that approaches to risk need revising. Professionals felt teachers should be involved in SRE delivery, but many young people reported disliking having their teachers deliver SRE and we found that key messages could become lost when interpreted by teachers. The divergence between young people and professionals was echoed by stakeholders. We developed criteria for best practice based on the evidence. CONCLUSIONS: We identified key features of effective and acceptable SRE. Our best practice criteria can be used to evaluate existing programmes, contribute to the development of new programmes and inform consultations around statutory SRE. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5730004/ /pubmed/28669970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014791 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Sexual Health
Pound, Pandora
Denford, Sarah
Shucksmith, Janet
Tanton, Clare
Johnson, Anne M
Owen, Jenny
Hutten, Rebecca
Mohan, Leanne
Bonell, Chris
Abraham, Charles
Campbell, Rona
What is best practice in sex and relationship education? A synthesis of evidence, including stakeholders’ views
title What is best practice in sex and relationship education? A synthesis of evidence, including stakeholders’ views
title_full What is best practice in sex and relationship education? A synthesis of evidence, including stakeholders’ views
title_fullStr What is best practice in sex and relationship education? A synthesis of evidence, including stakeholders’ views
title_full_unstemmed What is best practice in sex and relationship education? A synthesis of evidence, including stakeholders’ views
title_short What is best practice in sex and relationship education? A synthesis of evidence, including stakeholders’ views
title_sort what is best practice in sex and relationship education? a synthesis of evidence, including stakeholders’ views
topic Sexual Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28669970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014791
work_keys_str_mv AT poundpandora whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews
AT denfordsarah whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews
AT shucksmithjanet whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews
AT tantonclare whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews
AT johnsonannem whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews
AT owenjenny whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews
AT huttenrebecca whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews
AT mohanleanne whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews
AT bonellchris whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews
AT abrahamcharles whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews
AT campbellrona whatisbestpracticeinsexandrelationshipeducationasynthesisofevidenceincludingstakeholdersviews