Cargando…
Towards an optimal composition of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in out-of-hours primary care teams: a quasi-experimental study
OBJECTIVES: To gain insights into the ability of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) to meet patient demands in out-of-hours primary care by comparing the outcomes of teams with different ratios of practitioners. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study. SETTING: A GP cooperative (GPC)...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015509 |
_version_ | 1783286285141540864 |
---|---|
author | van der Biezen, Mieke Wensing, Michel van der Burgt, Regi Laurant, Miranda |
author_facet | van der Biezen, Mieke Wensing, Michel van der Burgt, Regi Laurant, Miranda |
author_sort | van der Biezen, Mieke |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To gain insights into the ability of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) to meet patient demands in out-of-hours primary care by comparing the outcomes of teams with different ratios of practitioners. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study. SETTING: A GP cooperative (GPC) in the Netherlands. INTERVENTION: Team 2 (1 NP, 3 GPs) and team 3 (2 NPs, 2 GPs) were compared with team 1 (4 GPs). Each team covered 35 weekend days. PARTICIPANTS: All 9503 patients who were scheduled for a consultation at the GPC through a nurse triage system. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the total number of consultations per provider for weekend cover between 10:00 and 18:00 hours. Secondary outcomes concerned the numbers of patients outside the NPs’ scope of practice, patient safety, resource use, direct healthcare costs and GPs’ performance. RESULTS: The mean number of consultations per shift was lower in teams with NPs (team 1: 93.9, team 3: 87.1; p<0.001). The mean proportion of patients outside NPs’ scope of practice per hour was 9.0% (SD 6.7), and the highest value in any hour was 40%. The proportion of patients who did not receive treatment within the targeted time period was higher in teams with NPs (team 2, 5.2%; team 3, 8.3%) compared with GPs only (team 1 3.5%) (p<0.01). Team 3 referred more patients to the emergency department (14.7%) compared with team 1 (12.0%; p=0.028). In teams with NPs, GPs more often treated urgent patients (team 1: 13.2%, team 2: 16.3%, team 3: 21.4%; p<0.01) and patients with digestive complaints (team 1: 11.1%, team 2: 11.8%, team 3: 16.7%; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Primary healthcare teams with a ratio of up to two GPs and two NPs provided sufficient capacity to provide care to all patients during weekend cover. Areas of concern are the number of consultations, delay in patient care and referrals to the emergency department. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02407847 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5730011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57300112017-12-19 Towards an optimal composition of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in out-of-hours primary care teams: a quasi-experimental study van der Biezen, Mieke Wensing, Michel van der Burgt, Regi Laurant, Miranda BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To gain insights into the ability of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) to meet patient demands in out-of-hours primary care by comparing the outcomes of teams with different ratios of practitioners. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study. SETTING: A GP cooperative (GPC) in the Netherlands. INTERVENTION: Team 2 (1 NP, 3 GPs) and team 3 (2 NPs, 2 GPs) were compared with team 1 (4 GPs). Each team covered 35 weekend days. PARTICIPANTS: All 9503 patients who were scheduled for a consultation at the GPC through a nurse triage system. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the total number of consultations per provider for weekend cover between 10:00 and 18:00 hours. Secondary outcomes concerned the numbers of patients outside the NPs’ scope of practice, patient safety, resource use, direct healthcare costs and GPs’ performance. RESULTS: The mean number of consultations per shift was lower in teams with NPs (team 1: 93.9, team 3: 87.1; p<0.001). The mean proportion of patients outside NPs’ scope of practice per hour was 9.0% (SD 6.7), and the highest value in any hour was 40%. The proportion of patients who did not receive treatment within the targeted time period was higher in teams with NPs (team 2, 5.2%; team 3, 8.3%) compared with GPs only (team 1 3.5%) (p<0.01). Team 3 referred more patients to the emergency department (14.7%) compared with team 1 (12.0%; p=0.028). In teams with NPs, GPs more often treated urgent patients (team 1: 13.2%, team 2: 16.3%, team 3: 21.4%; p<0.01) and patients with digestive complaints (team 1: 11.1%, team 2: 11.8%, team 3: 16.7%; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Primary healthcare teams with a ratio of up to two GPs and two NPs provided sufficient capacity to provide care to all patients during weekend cover. Areas of concern are the number of consultations, delay in patient care and referrals to the emergency department. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02407847 BMJ Open 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5730011/ /pubmed/28559458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015509 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice van der Biezen, Mieke Wensing, Michel van der Burgt, Regi Laurant, Miranda Towards an optimal composition of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in out-of-hours primary care teams: a quasi-experimental study |
title | Towards an optimal composition of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in out-of-hours primary care teams: a quasi-experimental study |
title_full | Towards an optimal composition of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in out-of-hours primary care teams: a quasi-experimental study |
title_fullStr | Towards an optimal composition of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in out-of-hours primary care teams: a quasi-experimental study |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards an optimal composition of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in out-of-hours primary care teams: a quasi-experimental study |
title_short | Towards an optimal composition of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in out-of-hours primary care teams: a quasi-experimental study |
title_sort | towards an optimal composition of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in out-of-hours primary care teams: a quasi-experimental study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderbiezenmieke towardsanoptimalcompositionofgeneralpractitionersandnursepractitionersinoutofhoursprimarycareteamsaquasiexperimentalstudy AT wensingmichel towardsanoptimalcompositionofgeneralpractitionersandnursepractitionersinoutofhoursprimarycareteamsaquasiexperimentalstudy AT vanderburgtregi towardsanoptimalcompositionofgeneralpractitionersandnursepractitionersinoutofhoursprimarycareteamsaquasiexperimentalstudy AT laurantmiranda towardsanoptimalcompositionofgeneralpractitionersandnursepractitionersinoutofhoursprimarycareteamsaquasiexperimentalstudy |