Cargando…

Abbreviation of the Follow-Up NIH Stroke Scale Using Factor Analysis

BACKGROUND: The NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item measure of stroke-related neurologic deficits that, when measured at 24 h, is highly predictive of long-term functional outcome. We hypothesized that a simplified 24-h scale that incorporates the most predictive components of the NIHSS can retain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raza, Syed Ali, Frankel, Michael R., Rangaraju, Srikant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28968607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000479933
_version_ 1783286296717819904
author Raza, Syed Ali
Frankel, Michael R.
Rangaraju, Srikant
author_facet Raza, Syed Ali
Frankel, Michael R.
Rangaraju, Srikant
author_sort Raza, Syed Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item measure of stroke-related neurologic deficits that, when measured at 24 h, is highly predictive of long-term functional outcome. We hypothesized that a simplified 24-h scale that incorporates the most predictive components of the NIHSS can retain prognostic accuracy and have improved interrater reliability. METHODS: In a post hoc analysis of the Interventional Management of Stroke-3 (IMS-3) trial, we performed principal component (PC) analysis to resolve the 24-h NIHSS into PCs. In the PCs that explained the largest proportions of variance, key variables were identified. Using these key variables, the prognostic accuracies (area under the curve [AUC]) for good outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2) and poor outcome (mRS 5–6) of various abbreviated NIHSS iterations were compared with the total 24-h NIHSS. The results were validated in the NINDS intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (NINDS-TPA) study cohort. Based on previously published data, interrater reliability of the abbreviated 24-h NIHSS (aNIHSS) was compared to the total 24-h NIHSS. RESULTS: In 545 IMS-3 participants, 2 PCs explained 60.8% of variance in the 24-h NIHSS. The key variables in PC1 included neglect, arm and leg weakness; while PC2 included level-of-consciousness (LOC) questions, LOC commands, and aphasia. A 3-variable aNIHSS (aphasia, neglect, arm weakness) retained excellent prognostic accuracy for good outcome (AUC = 0.90) as compared to the total 24-h NIHSS (AUC = 0.91), and it was more predictive (p < 0.001) than the baseline NIHSS (AUC = 0.73). The prognostic accuracy of the aNIHSS for good outcome was validated in the NINDS-TPA trial cohort (aNIHSS: AUC = 0.89 vs. total 24-h NIHSS: 0.92). An aNIHSS >9 predicted very poor outcomes (mRS 0–2: 0%, mRS 4–6: 98.5%). The estimated interrater reliability of the aNIHSS was higher than that of the total 24-h NIHSS across 6 published datasets (mean weighted kappa 0.80 vs. 0.73, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: At 24 h following ischemic stroke, aphasia, neglect, and arm weakness are the most prognostically relevant neurologic findings. The aNIHSS appears to have excellent prognostic accuracy with higher reliability and may be clinically useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5730111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57301112017-12-18 Abbreviation of the Follow-Up NIH Stroke Scale Using Factor Analysis Raza, Syed Ali Frankel, Michael R. Rangaraju, Srikant Cerebrovasc Dis Extra Original Paper BACKGROUND: The NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item measure of stroke-related neurologic deficits that, when measured at 24 h, is highly predictive of long-term functional outcome. We hypothesized that a simplified 24-h scale that incorporates the most predictive components of the NIHSS can retain prognostic accuracy and have improved interrater reliability. METHODS: In a post hoc analysis of the Interventional Management of Stroke-3 (IMS-3) trial, we performed principal component (PC) analysis to resolve the 24-h NIHSS into PCs. In the PCs that explained the largest proportions of variance, key variables were identified. Using these key variables, the prognostic accuracies (area under the curve [AUC]) for good outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2) and poor outcome (mRS 5–6) of various abbreviated NIHSS iterations were compared with the total 24-h NIHSS. The results were validated in the NINDS intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (NINDS-TPA) study cohort. Based on previously published data, interrater reliability of the abbreviated 24-h NIHSS (aNIHSS) was compared to the total 24-h NIHSS. RESULTS: In 545 IMS-3 participants, 2 PCs explained 60.8% of variance in the 24-h NIHSS. The key variables in PC1 included neglect, arm and leg weakness; while PC2 included level-of-consciousness (LOC) questions, LOC commands, and aphasia. A 3-variable aNIHSS (aphasia, neglect, arm weakness) retained excellent prognostic accuracy for good outcome (AUC = 0.90) as compared to the total 24-h NIHSS (AUC = 0.91), and it was more predictive (p < 0.001) than the baseline NIHSS (AUC = 0.73). The prognostic accuracy of the aNIHSS for good outcome was validated in the NINDS-TPA trial cohort (aNIHSS: AUC = 0.89 vs. total 24-h NIHSS: 0.92). An aNIHSS >9 predicted very poor outcomes (mRS 0–2: 0%, mRS 4–6: 98.5%). The estimated interrater reliability of the aNIHSS was higher than that of the total 24-h NIHSS across 6 published datasets (mean weighted kappa 0.80 vs. 0.73, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: At 24 h following ischemic stroke, aphasia, neglect, and arm weakness are the most prognostically relevant neurologic findings. The aNIHSS appears to have excellent prognostic accuracy with higher reliability and may be clinically useful. S. Karger AG 2017-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5730111/ /pubmed/28968607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000479933 Text en Copyright © 2017 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Raza, Syed Ali
Frankel, Michael R.
Rangaraju, Srikant
Abbreviation of the Follow-Up NIH Stroke Scale Using Factor Analysis
title Abbreviation of the Follow-Up NIH Stroke Scale Using Factor Analysis
title_full Abbreviation of the Follow-Up NIH Stroke Scale Using Factor Analysis
title_fullStr Abbreviation of the Follow-Up NIH Stroke Scale Using Factor Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Abbreviation of the Follow-Up NIH Stroke Scale Using Factor Analysis
title_short Abbreviation of the Follow-Up NIH Stroke Scale Using Factor Analysis
title_sort abbreviation of the follow-up nih stroke scale using factor analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28968607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000479933
work_keys_str_mv AT razasyedali abbreviationofthefollowupnihstrokescaleusingfactoranalysis
AT frankelmichaelr abbreviationofthefollowupnihstrokescaleusingfactoranalysis
AT rangarajusrikant abbreviationofthefollowupnihstrokescaleusingfactoranalysis