Cargando…

Forest loss in New England: A projection of recent trends

New England has lost more than 350,000 ha of forest cover since 1985, marking a reversal of a two-hundred-year trend of forest expansion. We a cellular land-cover change model to project a continuation of recent trends (1990–2010) in forest loss across six New England states from 2010 to 2060. Recen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Jonathan R., Plisinski, Joshua S., Olofsson, Pontus, Holden, Christopher E., Duveneck, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29240810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189636
_version_ 1783286300093186048
author Thompson, Jonathan R.
Plisinski, Joshua S.
Olofsson, Pontus
Holden, Christopher E.
Duveneck, Matthew J.
author_facet Thompson, Jonathan R.
Plisinski, Joshua S.
Olofsson, Pontus
Holden, Christopher E.
Duveneck, Matthew J.
author_sort Thompson, Jonathan R.
collection PubMed
description New England has lost more than 350,000 ha of forest cover since 1985, marking a reversal of a two-hundred-year trend of forest expansion. We a cellular land-cover change model to project a continuation of recent trends (1990–2010) in forest loss across six New England states from 2010 to 2060. Recent trends were estimated using a continuous change detection algorithm applied to twenty years of Landsat images. We addressed three questions: (1) What would be the consequences of a continuation of the recent trends in terms of changes to New England's forest cover mosaic? (2) What social and biophysical attributes are most strongly associated with recent trends in forest loss, and how do these vary geographically? (3) How sensitive are projections of forest loss to the reference period—i.e. how do projections based on the period spanning 1990-to-2000 differ from 2000-to-2010, or from the full period, 1990-to-2010? Over the full reference period, 8201 ha yr-1 and 468 ha yr-1 of forest were lost to low- and high-density development, respectively. Forest loss was concentrated in suburban areas, particularly near Boston. Of the variables considered, 'distance to developed land' was the strongest predictor of forest loss. The next most important predictor varied geographically: 'distance to roads' ranked second in the more developed regions in the south and 'population density' ranked second in the less developed north. The importance and geographical variation in predictor variables were relatively stable between reference periods. In contrast, there was 55% more forest loss during the 1990-to-2000 reference period compared to the 2000-to-2010 period, highlighting the importance of understanding the variation in reference periods when projecting land cover change. The projection of recent trends is an important baseline scenario with implications for the management of forest ecosystems and the services they provide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5730125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57301252017-12-22 Forest loss in New England: A projection of recent trends Thompson, Jonathan R. Plisinski, Joshua S. Olofsson, Pontus Holden, Christopher E. Duveneck, Matthew J. PLoS One Research Article New England has lost more than 350,000 ha of forest cover since 1985, marking a reversal of a two-hundred-year trend of forest expansion. We a cellular land-cover change model to project a continuation of recent trends (1990–2010) in forest loss across six New England states from 2010 to 2060. Recent trends were estimated using a continuous change detection algorithm applied to twenty years of Landsat images. We addressed three questions: (1) What would be the consequences of a continuation of the recent trends in terms of changes to New England's forest cover mosaic? (2) What social and biophysical attributes are most strongly associated with recent trends in forest loss, and how do these vary geographically? (3) How sensitive are projections of forest loss to the reference period—i.e. how do projections based on the period spanning 1990-to-2000 differ from 2000-to-2010, or from the full period, 1990-to-2010? Over the full reference period, 8201 ha yr-1 and 468 ha yr-1 of forest were lost to low- and high-density development, respectively. Forest loss was concentrated in suburban areas, particularly near Boston. Of the variables considered, 'distance to developed land' was the strongest predictor of forest loss. The next most important predictor varied geographically: 'distance to roads' ranked second in the more developed regions in the south and 'population density' ranked second in the less developed north. The importance and geographical variation in predictor variables were relatively stable between reference periods. In contrast, there was 55% more forest loss during the 1990-to-2000 reference period compared to the 2000-to-2010 period, highlighting the importance of understanding the variation in reference periods when projecting land cover change. The projection of recent trends is an important baseline scenario with implications for the management of forest ecosystems and the services they provide. Public Library of Science 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5730125/ /pubmed/29240810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189636 Text en © 2017 Thompson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thompson, Jonathan R.
Plisinski, Joshua S.
Olofsson, Pontus
Holden, Christopher E.
Duveneck, Matthew J.
Forest loss in New England: A projection of recent trends
title Forest loss in New England: A projection of recent trends
title_full Forest loss in New England: A projection of recent trends
title_fullStr Forest loss in New England: A projection of recent trends
title_full_unstemmed Forest loss in New England: A projection of recent trends
title_short Forest loss in New England: A projection of recent trends
title_sort forest loss in new england: a projection of recent trends
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29240810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189636
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonjonathanr forestlossinnewenglandaprojectionofrecenttrends
AT plisinskijoshuas forestlossinnewenglandaprojectionofrecenttrends
AT olofssonpontus forestlossinnewenglandaprojectionofrecenttrends
AT holdenchristophere forestlossinnewenglandaprojectionofrecenttrends
AT duveneckmatthewj forestlossinnewenglandaprojectionofrecenttrends