Cargando…

Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the concordance between clinic-collected extra-genital specimens and self-collected mailed-in extra-genital specimens among participants seeking sexually transmitted infection testing at a free clinic in Hollywood, CA. METHODS: A convenience sample of 210 men who have sex wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salow, Katheryn R., Cohen, Adam C., Bristow, Claire C., McGrath, Mark R., Klausner, Jeffrey D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29240781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189515
_version_ 1783286306053292032
author Salow, Katheryn R.
Cohen, Adam C.
Bristow, Claire C.
McGrath, Mark R.
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
author_facet Salow, Katheryn R.
Cohen, Adam C.
Bristow, Claire C.
McGrath, Mark R.
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
author_sort Salow, Katheryn R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the concordance between clinic-collected extra-genital specimens and self-collected mailed-in extra-genital specimens among participants seeking sexually transmitted infection testing at a free clinic in Hollywood, CA. METHODS: A convenience sample of 210 men who have sex with men were enrolled between February 29, 2016 and December 21, 2016 and received mail-in testing kits for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG). All testing was performed using the GeneXpert® CT/NG (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). RESULTS: From the 210 mail-in kits distributed, 149 mail-in kits (71.0%) were returned to the laboratory, resulting in 145 pairs (clinic-collected and mail-in) of rectal test results and 148 pairs of pharyngeal test results for both CT and NG detection. The concordance was 95.0% for all CT rectal tests, 99.3% for all CT pharyngeal tests, 95.7% for all NG rectal tests, and 97.2% for all NG pharyngeal tests. CONCLUSION: Roughly two-thirds of mail-in test kits were returned and concordance was generally high, however more than one-third of positive results were missed in mail-in samples. The prevalence of potential false-negative results among mail-in samples warrants caution when implementing mail-in STI testing strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5730150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57301502017-12-22 Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites Salow, Katheryn R. Cohen, Adam C. Bristow, Claire C. McGrath, Mark R. Klausner, Jeffrey D. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the concordance between clinic-collected extra-genital specimens and self-collected mailed-in extra-genital specimens among participants seeking sexually transmitted infection testing at a free clinic in Hollywood, CA. METHODS: A convenience sample of 210 men who have sex with men were enrolled between February 29, 2016 and December 21, 2016 and received mail-in testing kits for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG). All testing was performed using the GeneXpert® CT/NG (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). RESULTS: From the 210 mail-in kits distributed, 149 mail-in kits (71.0%) were returned to the laboratory, resulting in 145 pairs (clinic-collected and mail-in) of rectal test results and 148 pairs of pharyngeal test results for both CT and NG detection. The concordance was 95.0% for all CT rectal tests, 99.3% for all CT pharyngeal tests, 95.7% for all NG rectal tests, and 97.2% for all NG pharyngeal tests. CONCLUSION: Roughly two-thirds of mail-in test kits were returned and concordance was generally high, however more than one-third of positive results were missed in mail-in samples. The prevalence of potential false-negative results among mail-in samples warrants caution when implementing mail-in STI testing strategies. Public Library of Science 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5730150/ /pubmed/29240781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189515 Text en © 2017 Salow et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salow, Katheryn R.
Cohen, Adam C.
Bristow, Claire C.
McGrath, Mark R.
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites
title Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites
title_full Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites
title_fullStr Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites
title_full_unstemmed Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites
title_short Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites
title_sort comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via united states postal service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29240781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189515
work_keys_str_mv AT salowkatherynr comparingmailinselfcollectedspecimenssentviaunitedstatespostalserviceversuscliniccollectedspecimensforthedetectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeinextragenitalsites
AT cohenadamc comparingmailinselfcollectedspecimenssentviaunitedstatespostalserviceversuscliniccollectedspecimensforthedetectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeinextragenitalsites
AT bristowclairec comparingmailinselfcollectedspecimenssentviaunitedstatespostalserviceversuscliniccollectedspecimensforthedetectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeinextragenitalsites
AT mcgrathmarkr comparingmailinselfcollectedspecimenssentviaunitedstatespostalserviceversuscliniccollectedspecimensforthedetectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeinextragenitalsites
AT klausnerjeffreyd comparingmailinselfcollectedspecimenssentviaunitedstatespostalserviceversuscliniccollectedspecimensforthedetectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaeinextragenitalsites