Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015

BACKGROUND: Research has shown a modest adherence of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies in glaucoma to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD). We have applied the updated 30-item STARD 2015 checklist to a set of studies included in a Cochrane DTA systematic review of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michelessi, Manuele, Lucenteforte, Ersilia, Miele, Alba, Oddone, Francesco, Crescioli, Giada, Fameli, Valeria, Korevaar, Daniël A., Virgili, Gianni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29240827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189716
_version_ 1783286313849454592
author Michelessi, Manuele
Lucenteforte, Ersilia
Miele, Alba
Oddone, Francesco
Crescioli, Giada
Fameli, Valeria
Korevaar, Daniël A.
Virgili, Gianni
author_facet Michelessi, Manuele
Lucenteforte, Ersilia
Miele, Alba
Oddone, Francesco
Crescioli, Giada
Fameli, Valeria
Korevaar, Daniël A.
Virgili, Gianni
author_sort Michelessi, Manuele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research has shown a modest adherence of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies in glaucoma to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD). We have applied the updated 30-item STARD 2015 checklist to a set of studies included in a Cochrane DTA systematic review of imaging tools for diagnosing manifest glaucoma. METHODS: Three pairs of reviewers, including one senior reviewer who assessed all studies, independently checked the adherence of each study to STARD 2015. Adherence was analyzed on an individual-item basis. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of publication year and impact factor on adherence. RESULTS: We included 106 DTA studies, published between 2003–2014 in journals with a median impact factor of 2.6. Overall adherence was 54.1% for 3,286 individual rating across 31 items, with a mean of 16.8 (SD: 3.1; range 8–23) items per study. Large variability in adherence to reporting standards was detected across individual STARD 2015 items, ranging from 0 to 100%. Nine items (1: identification as diagnostic accuracy study in title/abstract; 6: eligibility criteria; 10: index test (a) and reference standard (b) definition; 12: cut-off definitions for index test (a) and reference standard (b); 14: estimation of diagnostic accuracy measures; 21a: severity spectrum of diseased; 23: cross-tabulation of the index and reference standard results) were adequately reported in more than 90% of the studies. Conversely, 10 items (3: scientific and clinical background of the index test; 11: rationale for the reference standard; 13b: blinding of index test results; 17: analyses of variability; 18; sample size calculation; 19: study flow diagram; 20: baseline characteristics of participants; 28: registration number and registry; 29: availability of study protocol; 30: sources of funding) were adequately reported in less than 30% of the studies. Only four items showed a statistically significant improvement over time: missing data (16), baseline characteristics of participants (20), estimates of diagnostic accuracy (24) and sources of funding (30). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to STARD 2015 among DTA studies in glaucoma research is incomplete, and only modestly increasing over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5730182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57301822017-12-22 Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015 Michelessi, Manuele Lucenteforte, Ersilia Miele, Alba Oddone, Francesco Crescioli, Giada Fameli, Valeria Korevaar, Daniël A. Virgili, Gianni PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Research has shown a modest adherence of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies in glaucoma to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD). We have applied the updated 30-item STARD 2015 checklist to a set of studies included in a Cochrane DTA systematic review of imaging tools for diagnosing manifest glaucoma. METHODS: Three pairs of reviewers, including one senior reviewer who assessed all studies, independently checked the adherence of each study to STARD 2015. Adherence was analyzed on an individual-item basis. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of publication year and impact factor on adherence. RESULTS: We included 106 DTA studies, published between 2003–2014 in journals with a median impact factor of 2.6. Overall adherence was 54.1% for 3,286 individual rating across 31 items, with a mean of 16.8 (SD: 3.1; range 8–23) items per study. Large variability in adherence to reporting standards was detected across individual STARD 2015 items, ranging from 0 to 100%. Nine items (1: identification as diagnostic accuracy study in title/abstract; 6: eligibility criteria; 10: index test (a) and reference standard (b) definition; 12: cut-off definitions for index test (a) and reference standard (b); 14: estimation of diagnostic accuracy measures; 21a: severity spectrum of diseased; 23: cross-tabulation of the index and reference standard results) were adequately reported in more than 90% of the studies. Conversely, 10 items (3: scientific and clinical background of the index test; 11: rationale for the reference standard; 13b: blinding of index test results; 17: analyses of variability; 18; sample size calculation; 19: study flow diagram; 20: baseline characteristics of participants; 28: registration number and registry; 29: availability of study protocol; 30: sources of funding) were adequately reported in less than 30% of the studies. Only four items showed a statistically significant improvement over time: missing data (16), baseline characteristics of participants (20), estimates of diagnostic accuracy (24) and sources of funding (30). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to STARD 2015 among DTA studies in glaucoma research is incomplete, and only modestly increasing over time. Public Library of Science 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5730182/ /pubmed/29240827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189716 Text en © 2017 Michelessi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Michelessi, Manuele
Lucenteforte, Ersilia
Miele, Alba
Oddone, Francesco
Crescioli, Giada
Fameli, Valeria
Korevaar, Daniël A.
Virgili, Gianni
Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015
title Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015
title_full Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015
title_short Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015
title_sort diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: an application of standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies (stard) 2015
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29240827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189716
work_keys_str_mv AT michelessimanuele diagnosticaccuracyresearchinglaucomaisstillincompletelyreportedanapplicationofstandardsforreportingofdiagnosticaccuracystudiesstard2015
AT lucenteforteersilia diagnosticaccuracyresearchinglaucomaisstillincompletelyreportedanapplicationofstandardsforreportingofdiagnosticaccuracystudiesstard2015
AT mielealba diagnosticaccuracyresearchinglaucomaisstillincompletelyreportedanapplicationofstandardsforreportingofdiagnosticaccuracystudiesstard2015
AT oddonefrancesco diagnosticaccuracyresearchinglaucomaisstillincompletelyreportedanapplicationofstandardsforreportingofdiagnosticaccuracystudiesstard2015
AT crescioligiada diagnosticaccuracyresearchinglaucomaisstillincompletelyreportedanapplicationofstandardsforreportingofdiagnosticaccuracystudiesstard2015
AT famelivaleria diagnosticaccuracyresearchinglaucomaisstillincompletelyreportedanapplicationofstandardsforreportingofdiagnosticaccuracystudiesstard2015
AT korevaardaniela diagnosticaccuracyresearchinglaucomaisstillincompletelyreportedanapplicationofstandardsforreportingofdiagnosticaccuracystudiesstard2015
AT virgiligianni diagnosticaccuracyresearchinglaucomaisstillincompletelyreportedanapplicationofstandardsforreportingofdiagnosticaccuracystudiesstard2015