Cargando…
Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether the presence of a pre-formed percutaneous renal access (PCA) had any effects on fluoroscopy time (FT) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: After ethics approval was obtained, medical records of all patients who underwent PCNL bet...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Second Military Medical University
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2015.08.001 |
_version_ | 1783286408608219136 |
---|---|
author | Noureldin, Yasser A. Elkoushy, Mohamed A. Andonian, Sero |
author_facet | Noureldin, Yasser A. Elkoushy, Mohamed A. Andonian, Sero |
author_sort | Noureldin, Yasser A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether the presence of a pre-formed percutaneous renal access (PCA) had any effects on fluoroscopy time (FT) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: After ethics approval was obtained, medical records of all patients who underwent PCNL between 2009 and 2013 at a tertiary stone referral centre were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with and without pre-formed PCA undergoing PCNL were compared. Patients who underwent second-look PCNL and those who had their access inserted by interventional radiology constituted the group with pre-formed PCA. RESULTS: A total of 185 PCNLs were reviewed. The mean patient age was 55.2 ± 1.0 years with mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.8 ± 0.5 kg/m(2) and male gender of 63.8%. The mean stone size was 618.4 ± 47.0 mm(2) with mean Guy's grade of 2.3 ± 0.7 and mean S.T.O.N.E. score of 7.6 ± 0.1. The mean operative time was 98.7 ± 2.6 min with mean FT of 113.4 ± 4.5 s. The overall stone-free rate was 71.9% with complication rate of 16.2%. When compared with PCNLs without pre-formed PCA, PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly shorter FT (120.6 ± 5.1 vs. 77.5 ± 6.7 s; p < 0.001) and significantly lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly shorter FT (B. coefficient = −43.2 (95%CI: −66.4 to −20); p < 0.001) and lower EBL (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly lower FT and EBL when compared with PCNLs without pre-formed PCA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5730753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Second Military Medical University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57307532017-12-20 Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Noureldin, Yasser A. Elkoushy, Mohamed A. Andonian, Sero Asian J Urol Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether the presence of a pre-formed percutaneous renal access (PCA) had any effects on fluoroscopy time (FT) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: After ethics approval was obtained, medical records of all patients who underwent PCNL between 2009 and 2013 at a tertiary stone referral centre were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with and without pre-formed PCA undergoing PCNL were compared. Patients who underwent second-look PCNL and those who had their access inserted by interventional radiology constituted the group with pre-formed PCA. RESULTS: A total of 185 PCNLs were reviewed. The mean patient age was 55.2 ± 1.0 years with mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.8 ± 0.5 kg/m(2) and male gender of 63.8%. The mean stone size was 618.4 ± 47.0 mm(2) with mean Guy's grade of 2.3 ± 0.7 and mean S.T.O.N.E. score of 7.6 ± 0.1. The mean operative time was 98.7 ± 2.6 min with mean FT of 113.4 ± 4.5 s. The overall stone-free rate was 71.9% with complication rate of 16.2%. When compared with PCNLs without pre-formed PCA, PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly shorter FT (120.6 ± 5.1 vs. 77.5 ± 6.7 s; p < 0.001) and significantly lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly shorter FT (B. coefficient = −43.2 (95%CI: −66.4 to −20); p < 0.001) and lower EBL (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly lower FT and EBL when compared with PCNLs without pre-formed PCA. Second Military Medical University 2015-10 2015-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5730753/ /pubmed/29264149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2015.08.001 Text en © 2015 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Noureldin, Yasser A. Elkoushy, Mohamed A. Andonian, Sero Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title | Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title_full | Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title_fullStr | Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title_short | Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
title_sort | does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2015.08.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noureldinyassera doesthepresenceofapercutaneousrenalaccessinfluencefluoroscopytimeduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT elkoushymohameda doesthepresenceofapercutaneousrenalaccessinfluencefluoroscopytimeduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT andoniansero doesthepresenceofapercutaneousrenalaccessinfluencefluoroscopytimeduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy |