Cargando…

Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether the presence of a pre-formed percutaneous renal access (PCA) had any effects on fluoroscopy time (FT) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: After ethics approval was obtained, medical records of all patients who underwent PCNL bet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noureldin, Yasser A., Elkoushy, Mohamed A., Andonian, Sero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Second Military Medical University 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2015.08.001
_version_ 1783286408608219136
author Noureldin, Yasser A.
Elkoushy, Mohamed A.
Andonian, Sero
author_facet Noureldin, Yasser A.
Elkoushy, Mohamed A.
Andonian, Sero
author_sort Noureldin, Yasser A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether the presence of a pre-formed percutaneous renal access (PCA) had any effects on fluoroscopy time (FT) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: After ethics approval was obtained, medical records of all patients who underwent PCNL between 2009 and 2013 at a tertiary stone referral centre were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with and without pre-formed PCA undergoing PCNL were compared. Patients who underwent second-look PCNL and those who had their access inserted by interventional radiology constituted the group with pre-formed PCA. RESULTS: A total of 185 PCNLs were reviewed. The mean patient age was 55.2 ± 1.0 years with mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.8 ± 0.5 kg/m(2) and male gender of 63.8%. The mean stone size was 618.4 ± 47.0 mm(2) with mean Guy's grade of 2.3 ± 0.7 and mean S.T.O.N.E. score of 7.6 ± 0.1. The mean operative time was 98.7 ± 2.6 min with mean FT of 113.4 ± 4.5 s. The overall stone-free rate was 71.9% with complication rate of 16.2%. When compared with PCNLs without pre-formed PCA, PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly shorter FT (120.6 ± 5.1 vs. 77.5 ± 6.7 s; p < 0.001) and significantly lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly shorter FT (B. coefficient = −43.2 (95%CI: −66.4 to −20); p < 0.001) and lower EBL (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly lower FT and EBL when compared with PCNLs without pre-formed PCA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5730753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Second Military Medical University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57307532017-12-20 Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Noureldin, Yasser A. Elkoushy, Mohamed A. Andonian, Sero Asian J Urol Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether the presence of a pre-formed percutaneous renal access (PCA) had any effects on fluoroscopy time (FT) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: After ethics approval was obtained, medical records of all patients who underwent PCNL between 2009 and 2013 at a tertiary stone referral centre were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with and without pre-formed PCA undergoing PCNL were compared. Patients who underwent second-look PCNL and those who had their access inserted by interventional radiology constituted the group with pre-formed PCA. RESULTS: A total of 185 PCNLs were reviewed. The mean patient age was 55.2 ± 1.0 years with mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.8 ± 0.5 kg/m(2) and male gender of 63.8%. The mean stone size was 618.4 ± 47.0 mm(2) with mean Guy's grade of 2.3 ± 0.7 and mean S.T.O.N.E. score of 7.6 ± 0.1. The mean operative time was 98.7 ± 2.6 min with mean FT of 113.4 ± 4.5 s. The overall stone-free rate was 71.9% with complication rate of 16.2%. When compared with PCNLs without pre-formed PCA, PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly shorter FT (120.6 ± 5.1 vs. 77.5 ± 6.7 s; p < 0.001) and significantly lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly shorter FT (B. coefficient = −43.2 (95%CI: −66.4 to −20); p < 0.001) and lower EBL (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: PCNLs with pre-formed PCA were associated with significantly lower FT and EBL when compared with PCNLs without pre-formed PCA. Second Military Medical University 2015-10 2015-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5730753/ /pubmed/29264149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2015.08.001 Text en © 2015 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Noureldin, Yasser A.
Elkoushy, Mohamed A.
Andonian, Sero
Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
title Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
title_full Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
title_fullStr Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
title_full_unstemmed Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
title_short Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
title_sort does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2015.08.001
work_keys_str_mv AT noureldinyassera doesthepresenceofapercutaneousrenalaccessinfluencefluoroscopytimeduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT elkoushymohameda doesthepresenceofapercutaneousrenalaccessinfluencefluoroscopytimeduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT andoniansero doesthepresenceofapercutaneousrenalaccessinfluencefluoroscopytimeduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy