Cargando…

Stents for malignant ureteral obstruction

Malignant ureteral obstruction can result in renal dysfunction or urosepsis and can limit the physician's ability to treat the underlying cancer. There are multiple methods to deal with ureteral obstruction including regular polymeric double J stents (DJS), tandem DJS, nephrostomy tubes, and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavlovic, Kristina, Lange, Dirk, Chew, Ben H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Second Military Medical University 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2016.04.002
_version_ 1783286418195349504
author Pavlovic, Kristina
Lange, Dirk
Chew, Ben H.
author_facet Pavlovic, Kristina
Lange, Dirk
Chew, Ben H.
author_sort Pavlovic, Kristina
collection PubMed
description Malignant ureteral obstruction can result in renal dysfunction or urosepsis and can limit the physician's ability to treat the underlying cancer. There are multiple methods to deal with ureteral obstruction including regular polymeric double J stents (DJS), tandem DJS, nephrostomy tubes, and then more specialized products such as solid metal stents (e.g., Resonance Stent, Cook Medical) and polyurethane stents reinforced with nickel-titanium (e.g., UVENTA stents, TaeWoong Medical). In patients who require long-term stenting, a nephrostomy tube could be transformed subcutaneously into an extra-anatomic stent that is then inserted into the bladder subcutaneously. We outline the most recent developments published since 2012 and report on identifiable risk factors that predict for failure of urinary drainage. These failures are typically a sign of cancer progression and the natural history of the disease rather than the individual type of drainage device. Factors that were identified to predict drainage failure included low serum albumin, bilateral hydronephrosis, elevated C-reactive protein, and the presence of pleural effusion. Head-to-head studies show that metal stents are superior to polymeric DJS in terms of maintaining patency. Discussions with the patient should take into consideration the frequency that exchanges will be needed, the need for externalized hardware (with nephrostomy tubes), or severe urinary symptoms in the case of internal DJS. This review will highlight the current state of diversions in the setting of malignant ureteral obstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5730830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Second Military Medical University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57308302017-12-20 Stents for malignant ureteral obstruction Pavlovic, Kristina Lange, Dirk Chew, Ben H. Asian J Urol Editorial Malignant ureteral obstruction can result in renal dysfunction or urosepsis and can limit the physician's ability to treat the underlying cancer. There are multiple methods to deal with ureteral obstruction including regular polymeric double J stents (DJS), tandem DJS, nephrostomy tubes, and then more specialized products such as solid metal stents (e.g., Resonance Stent, Cook Medical) and polyurethane stents reinforced with nickel-titanium (e.g., UVENTA stents, TaeWoong Medical). In patients who require long-term stenting, a nephrostomy tube could be transformed subcutaneously into an extra-anatomic stent that is then inserted into the bladder subcutaneously. We outline the most recent developments published since 2012 and report on identifiable risk factors that predict for failure of urinary drainage. These failures are typically a sign of cancer progression and the natural history of the disease rather than the individual type of drainage device. Factors that were identified to predict drainage failure included low serum albumin, bilateral hydronephrosis, elevated C-reactive protein, and the presence of pleural effusion. Head-to-head studies show that metal stents are superior to polymeric DJS in terms of maintaining patency. Discussions with the patient should take into consideration the frequency that exchanges will be needed, the need for externalized hardware (with nephrostomy tubes), or severe urinary symptoms in the case of internal DJS. This review will highlight the current state of diversions in the setting of malignant ureteral obstruction. Second Military Medical University 2016-07 2016-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5730830/ /pubmed/29264182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2016.04.002 Text en © 2016 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Editorial
Pavlovic, Kristina
Lange, Dirk
Chew, Ben H.
Stents for malignant ureteral obstruction
title Stents for malignant ureteral obstruction
title_full Stents for malignant ureteral obstruction
title_fullStr Stents for malignant ureteral obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Stents for malignant ureteral obstruction
title_short Stents for malignant ureteral obstruction
title_sort stents for malignant ureteral obstruction
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2016.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlovickristina stentsformalignantureteralobstruction
AT langedirk stentsformalignantureteralobstruction
AT chewbenh stentsformalignantureteralobstruction