Cargando…
Robotic surgery in pediatric urology
While robotic surgery has shown clear utility and advantages in the adult population, its role in pediatrics remains controversial. Pediatric-sized robotic instruments and equipment are not readily available yet, so certain modifications can be made in order to make robotic surgery successful in chi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Second Military Medical University
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2016.06.002 |
_version_ | 1783286428343468032 |
---|---|
author | Howe, Adam Kozel, Zachary Palmer, Lane |
author_facet | Howe, Adam Kozel, Zachary Palmer, Lane |
author_sort | Howe, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | While robotic surgery has shown clear utility and advantages in the adult population, its role in pediatrics remains controversial. Pediatric-sized robotic instruments and equipment are not readily available yet, so certain modifications can be made in order to make robotic surgery successful in children. While the cost of robotic surgery remains high compared to open procedures, patients experience greater satisfaction and quality of life with robotic surgery. Robotic pyeloplasty is a standard of care in older children, and has even been performed in infants and re-do surgery. Other robotic procedures performed in children include heminephroureterectomy, ureteroureterostomy, ureteral reimplantation, urachal cyst excision, bladder diverticulectomy, and bladder reconstructive procedures such as augmentation, appendicovesicostomy, antegrade continence enema, bladder neck reconstruction and sling, as well as other procedures. Robotic surgery has also been used in oncologic cases such as partial nephrectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Future improvements in technology with production of pediatric-sized robotic instruments, along with increases in robotic-trained pediatric urologists and surgeon experience along each's learning curve, will help to further advance the field of robotic surgery in pediatric urology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5730905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Second Military Medical University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57309052017-12-20 Robotic surgery in pediatric urology Howe, Adam Kozel, Zachary Palmer, Lane Asian J Urol Review While robotic surgery has shown clear utility and advantages in the adult population, its role in pediatrics remains controversial. Pediatric-sized robotic instruments and equipment are not readily available yet, so certain modifications can be made in order to make robotic surgery successful in children. While the cost of robotic surgery remains high compared to open procedures, patients experience greater satisfaction and quality of life with robotic surgery. Robotic pyeloplasty is a standard of care in older children, and has even been performed in infants and re-do surgery. Other robotic procedures performed in children include heminephroureterectomy, ureteroureterostomy, ureteral reimplantation, urachal cyst excision, bladder diverticulectomy, and bladder reconstructive procedures such as augmentation, appendicovesicostomy, antegrade continence enema, bladder neck reconstruction and sling, as well as other procedures. Robotic surgery has also been used in oncologic cases such as partial nephrectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Future improvements in technology with production of pediatric-sized robotic instruments, along with increases in robotic-trained pediatric urologists and surgeon experience along each's learning curve, will help to further advance the field of robotic surgery in pediatric urology. Second Military Medical University 2017-01 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5730905/ /pubmed/29264208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2016.06.002 Text en © 2017 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Howe, Adam Kozel, Zachary Palmer, Lane Robotic surgery in pediatric urology |
title | Robotic surgery in pediatric urology |
title_full | Robotic surgery in pediatric urology |
title_fullStr | Robotic surgery in pediatric urology |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic surgery in pediatric urology |
title_short | Robotic surgery in pediatric urology |
title_sort | robotic surgery in pediatric urology |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2016.06.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT howeadam roboticsurgeryinpediatricurology AT kozelzachary roboticsurgeryinpediatricurology AT palmerlane roboticsurgeryinpediatricurology |