Cargando…

Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia

OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manolis, Antonis S., Georgiopoulos, Georgios, Metaxa, Sofia, Koulouris, Spyridon, Tsiachris, Dimitris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5731525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811391
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821
_version_ 1783286528362938368
author Manolis, Antonis S.
Georgiopoulos, Georgios
Metaxa, Sofia
Koulouris, Spyridon
Tsiachris, Dimitris
author_facet Manolis, Antonis S.
Georgiopoulos, Georgios
Metaxa, Sofia
Koulouris, Spyridon
Tsiachris, Dimitris
author_sort Manolis, Antonis S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads. METHODS: This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads. RESULTS: Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5731525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57315252017-12-18 Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia Manolis, Antonis S. Georgiopoulos, Georgios Metaxa, Sofia Koulouris, Spyridon Tsiachris, Dimitris Anatol J Cardiol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads. METHODS: This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads. RESULTS: Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia alone. Kare Publishing 2017-10 2017-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5731525/ /pubmed/28811391 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Turkish Society of Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Manolis, Antonis S.
Georgiopoulos, Georgios
Metaxa, Sofia
Koulouris, Spyridon
Tsiachris, Dimitris
Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia
title Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia
title_full Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia
title_fullStr Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia
title_short Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia
title_sort cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5731525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811391
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821
work_keys_str_mv AT manolisantoniss cardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadextractionusingtheleadlockingdevicesystemkeepingitsimplesafeandinexpensivewithmechanicaltoolsandlocalanesthesia
AT georgiopoulosgeorgios cardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadextractionusingtheleadlockingdevicesystemkeepingitsimplesafeandinexpensivewithmechanicaltoolsandlocalanesthesia
AT metaxasofia cardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadextractionusingtheleadlockingdevicesystemkeepingitsimplesafeandinexpensivewithmechanicaltoolsandlocalanesthesia
AT koulourisspyridon cardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadextractionusingtheleadlockingdevicesystemkeepingitsimplesafeandinexpensivewithmechanicaltoolsandlocalanesthesia
AT tsiachrisdimitris cardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadextractionusingtheleadlockingdevicesystemkeepingitsimplesafeandinexpensivewithmechanicaltoolsandlocalanesthesia