Cargando…
Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia
OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kare Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5731525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811391 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821 |
_version_ | 1783286528362938368 |
---|---|
author | Manolis, Antonis S. Georgiopoulos, Georgios Metaxa, Sofia Koulouris, Spyridon Tsiachris, Dimitris |
author_facet | Manolis, Antonis S. Georgiopoulos, Georgios Metaxa, Sofia Koulouris, Spyridon Tsiachris, Dimitris |
author_sort | Manolis, Antonis S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads. METHODS: This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads. RESULTS: Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5731525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Kare Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57315252017-12-18 Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia Manolis, Antonis S. Georgiopoulos, Georgios Metaxa, Sofia Koulouris, Spyridon Tsiachris, Dimitris Anatol J Cardiol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads. METHODS: This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads. RESULTS: Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia alone. Kare Publishing 2017-10 2017-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5731525/ /pubmed/28811391 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Turkish Society of Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Manolis, Antonis S. Georgiopoulos, Georgios Metaxa, Sofia Koulouris, Spyridon Tsiachris, Dimitris Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia |
title | Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia |
title_full | Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia |
title_fullStr | Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia |
title_short | Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia |
title_sort | cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5731525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811391 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manolisantoniss cardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadextractionusingtheleadlockingdevicesystemkeepingitsimplesafeandinexpensivewithmechanicaltoolsandlocalanesthesia AT georgiopoulosgeorgios cardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadextractionusingtheleadlockingdevicesystemkeepingitsimplesafeandinexpensivewithmechanicaltoolsandlocalanesthesia AT metaxasofia cardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadextractionusingtheleadlockingdevicesystemkeepingitsimplesafeandinexpensivewithmechanicaltoolsandlocalanesthesia AT koulourisspyridon cardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadextractionusingtheleadlockingdevicesystemkeepingitsimplesafeandinexpensivewithmechanicaltoolsandlocalanesthesia AT tsiachrisdimitris cardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceleadextractionusingtheleadlockingdevicesystemkeepingitsimplesafeandinexpensivewithmechanicaltoolsandlocalanesthesia |