Cargando…

Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance

Prestimulus oscillatory neural activity has been linked to perceptual outcomes during performance of psychophysical detection and discrimination tasks. Specifically, the power and phase of low frequency oscillations have been found to predict whether an upcoming weak visual target will be detected o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benwell, Christopher S. Y., Tagliabue, Chiara F., Veniero, Domenica, Cecere, Roberto, Savazzi, Silvia, Thut, Gregor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0182-17.2017
_version_ 1783286613690810368
author Benwell, Christopher S. Y.
Tagliabue, Chiara F.
Veniero, Domenica
Cecere, Roberto
Savazzi, Silvia
Thut, Gregor
author_facet Benwell, Christopher S. Y.
Tagliabue, Chiara F.
Veniero, Domenica
Cecere, Roberto
Savazzi, Silvia
Thut, Gregor
author_sort Benwell, Christopher S. Y.
collection PubMed
description Prestimulus oscillatory neural activity has been linked to perceptual outcomes during performance of psychophysical detection and discrimination tasks. Specifically, the power and phase of low frequency oscillations have been found to predict whether an upcoming weak visual target will be detected or not. However, the mechanisms by which baseline oscillatory activity influences perception remain unclear. Recent studies suggest that the frequently reported negative relationship between α power and stimulus detection may be explained by changes in detection criterion (i.e., increased target present responses regardless of whether the target was present/absent) driven by the state of neural excitability, rather than changes in visual sensitivity (i.e., more veridical percepts). Here, we recorded EEG while human participants performed a luminance discrimination task on perithreshold stimuli in combination with single-trial ratings of perceptual awareness. Our aim was to investigate whether the power and/or phase of prestimulus oscillatory activity predict discrimination accuracy and/or perceptual awareness on a trial-by-trial basis. Prestimulus power (3–28 Hz) was inversely related to perceptual awareness ratings (i.e., higher ratings in states of low prestimulus power/high excitability) but did not predict discrimination accuracy. In contrast, prestimulus oscillatory phase did not predict awareness ratings or accuracy in any frequency band. These results provide evidence that prestimulus α power influences the level of subjective awareness of threshold visual stimuli but does not influence visual sensitivity when a decision has to be made regarding stimulus features. Hence, we find a clear dissociation between the influence of ongoing neural activity on conscious awareness and objective performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5732016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57320162017-12-18 Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance Benwell, Christopher S. Y. Tagliabue, Chiara F. Veniero, Domenica Cecere, Roberto Savazzi, Silvia Thut, Gregor eNeuro New Research Prestimulus oscillatory neural activity has been linked to perceptual outcomes during performance of psychophysical detection and discrimination tasks. Specifically, the power and phase of low frequency oscillations have been found to predict whether an upcoming weak visual target will be detected or not. However, the mechanisms by which baseline oscillatory activity influences perception remain unclear. Recent studies suggest that the frequently reported negative relationship between α power and stimulus detection may be explained by changes in detection criterion (i.e., increased target present responses regardless of whether the target was present/absent) driven by the state of neural excitability, rather than changes in visual sensitivity (i.e., more veridical percepts). Here, we recorded EEG while human participants performed a luminance discrimination task on perithreshold stimuli in combination with single-trial ratings of perceptual awareness. Our aim was to investigate whether the power and/or phase of prestimulus oscillatory activity predict discrimination accuracy and/or perceptual awareness on a trial-by-trial basis. Prestimulus power (3–28 Hz) was inversely related to perceptual awareness ratings (i.e., higher ratings in states of low prestimulus power/high excitability) but did not predict discrimination accuracy. In contrast, prestimulus oscillatory phase did not predict awareness ratings or accuracy in any frequency band. These results provide evidence that prestimulus α power influences the level of subjective awareness of threshold visual stimuli but does not influence visual sensitivity when a decision has to be made regarding stimulus features. Hence, we find a clear dissociation between the influence of ongoing neural activity on conscious awareness and objective performance. Society for Neuroscience 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5732016/ /pubmed/29255794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0182-17.2017 Text en Copyright © 2017 Benwell et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle New Research
Benwell, Christopher S. Y.
Tagliabue, Chiara F.
Veniero, Domenica
Cecere, Roberto
Savazzi, Silvia
Thut, Gregor
Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance
title Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance
title_full Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance
title_fullStr Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance
title_full_unstemmed Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance
title_short Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance
title_sort prestimulus eeg power predicts conscious awareness but not objective visual performance
topic New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0182-17.2017
work_keys_str_mv AT benwellchristophersy prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance
AT tagliabuechiaraf prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance
AT venierodomenica prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance
AT cecereroberto prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance
AT savazzisilvia prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance
AT thutgregor prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance