Cargando…
Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance
Prestimulus oscillatory neural activity has been linked to perceptual outcomes during performance of psychophysical detection and discrimination tasks. Specifically, the power and phase of low frequency oscillations have been found to predict whether an upcoming weak visual target will be detected o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0182-17.2017 |
_version_ | 1783286613690810368 |
---|---|
author | Benwell, Christopher S. Y. Tagliabue, Chiara F. Veniero, Domenica Cecere, Roberto Savazzi, Silvia Thut, Gregor |
author_facet | Benwell, Christopher S. Y. Tagliabue, Chiara F. Veniero, Domenica Cecere, Roberto Savazzi, Silvia Thut, Gregor |
author_sort | Benwell, Christopher S. Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prestimulus oscillatory neural activity has been linked to perceptual outcomes during performance of psychophysical detection and discrimination tasks. Specifically, the power and phase of low frequency oscillations have been found to predict whether an upcoming weak visual target will be detected or not. However, the mechanisms by which baseline oscillatory activity influences perception remain unclear. Recent studies suggest that the frequently reported negative relationship between α power and stimulus detection may be explained by changes in detection criterion (i.e., increased target present responses regardless of whether the target was present/absent) driven by the state of neural excitability, rather than changes in visual sensitivity (i.e., more veridical percepts). Here, we recorded EEG while human participants performed a luminance discrimination task on perithreshold stimuli in combination with single-trial ratings of perceptual awareness. Our aim was to investigate whether the power and/or phase of prestimulus oscillatory activity predict discrimination accuracy and/or perceptual awareness on a trial-by-trial basis. Prestimulus power (3–28 Hz) was inversely related to perceptual awareness ratings (i.e., higher ratings in states of low prestimulus power/high excitability) but did not predict discrimination accuracy. In contrast, prestimulus oscillatory phase did not predict awareness ratings or accuracy in any frequency band. These results provide evidence that prestimulus α power influences the level of subjective awareness of threshold visual stimuli but does not influence visual sensitivity when a decision has to be made regarding stimulus features. Hence, we find a clear dissociation between the influence of ongoing neural activity on conscious awareness and objective performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5732016 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57320162017-12-18 Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance Benwell, Christopher S. Y. Tagliabue, Chiara F. Veniero, Domenica Cecere, Roberto Savazzi, Silvia Thut, Gregor eNeuro New Research Prestimulus oscillatory neural activity has been linked to perceptual outcomes during performance of psychophysical detection and discrimination tasks. Specifically, the power and phase of low frequency oscillations have been found to predict whether an upcoming weak visual target will be detected or not. However, the mechanisms by which baseline oscillatory activity influences perception remain unclear. Recent studies suggest that the frequently reported negative relationship between α power and stimulus detection may be explained by changes in detection criterion (i.e., increased target present responses regardless of whether the target was present/absent) driven by the state of neural excitability, rather than changes in visual sensitivity (i.e., more veridical percepts). Here, we recorded EEG while human participants performed a luminance discrimination task on perithreshold stimuli in combination with single-trial ratings of perceptual awareness. Our aim was to investigate whether the power and/or phase of prestimulus oscillatory activity predict discrimination accuracy and/or perceptual awareness on a trial-by-trial basis. Prestimulus power (3–28 Hz) was inversely related to perceptual awareness ratings (i.e., higher ratings in states of low prestimulus power/high excitability) but did not predict discrimination accuracy. In contrast, prestimulus oscillatory phase did not predict awareness ratings or accuracy in any frequency band. These results provide evidence that prestimulus α power influences the level of subjective awareness of threshold visual stimuli but does not influence visual sensitivity when a decision has to be made regarding stimulus features. Hence, we find a clear dissociation between the influence of ongoing neural activity on conscious awareness and objective performance. Society for Neuroscience 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5732016/ /pubmed/29255794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0182-17.2017 Text en Copyright © 2017 Benwell et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | New Research Benwell, Christopher S. Y. Tagliabue, Chiara F. Veniero, Domenica Cecere, Roberto Savazzi, Silvia Thut, Gregor Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance |
title | Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance |
title_full | Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance |
title_fullStr | Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance |
title_short | Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance |
title_sort | prestimulus eeg power predicts conscious awareness but not objective visual performance |
topic | New Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0182-17.2017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benwellchristophersy prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance AT tagliabuechiaraf prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance AT venierodomenica prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance AT cecereroberto prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance AT savazzisilvia prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance AT thutgregor prestimuluseegpowerpredictsconsciousawarenessbutnotobjectivevisualperformance |