Cargando…
The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, clinical decision making has been perceived as a purely rational and cognitive process. Recently, a number of authors have linked emotional intelligence (EI) to clinical decision making (CDM) and calls have been made for an increased focus on EI skills for clinicians. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7 |
_version_ | 1783286688833863680 |
---|---|
author | Kozlowski, Desirée Hutchinson, Marie Hurley, John Rowley, Joanne Sutherland, Joanna |
author_facet | Kozlowski, Desirée Hutchinson, Marie Hurley, John Rowley, Joanne Sutherland, Joanna |
author_sort | Kozlowski, Desirée |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traditionally, clinical decision making has been perceived as a purely rational and cognitive process. Recently, a number of authors have linked emotional intelligence (EI) to clinical decision making (CDM) and calls have been made for an increased focus on EI skills for clinicians. The objective of this integrative literature review was to identify and synthesise the empirical evidence for a role of emotion in CDM. METHODS: A systematic search of the bibliographic databases PubMed, PsychINFO, and CINAHL (EBSCO) was conducted to identify empirical studies of clinician populations. Search terms were focused to identify studies reporting clinician emotion OR clinician emotional intelligence OR emotional competence AND clinical decision making OR clinical reasoning. RESULTS: Twenty three papers were retained for synthesis. These represented empirical work from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches and comprised work with a focus on experienced emotion and on skills associated with emotional intelligence. The studies examined nurses (10), physicians (7), occupational therapists (1), physiotherapists (1), mixed clinician samples (3), and unspecified infectious disease experts (1). We identified two main themes in the context of clinical decision making: the subjective experience of emotion; and, the application of emotion and cognition in CDM. Sub-themes under the subjective experience of emotion were: emotional response to contextual pressures; emotional responses to others; and, intentional exclusion of emotion from CDM. Under the application of emotion and cognition in CDM, sub-themes were: compassionate emotional labour – responsiveness to patient emotion within CDM; interdisciplinary tension regarding the significance and meaning of emotion in CDM; and, emotion and moral judgement. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians’ experienced emotions can and do affect clinical decision making, although acknowledgement of that is far from universal. Importantly, this occurs in the in the absence of a clear theoretical framework and educational preparation may not reflect the importance of emotional competence to effective CDM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5732402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57324022017-12-21 The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review Kozlowski, Desirée Hutchinson, Marie Hurley, John Rowley, Joanne Sutherland, Joanna BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Traditionally, clinical decision making has been perceived as a purely rational and cognitive process. Recently, a number of authors have linked emotional intelligence (EI) to clinical decision making (CDM) and calls have been made for an increased focus on EI skills for clinicians. The objective of this integrative literature review was to identify and synthesise the empirical evidence for a role of emotion in CDM. METHODS: A systematic search of the bibliographic databases PubMed, PsychINFO, and CINAHL (EBSCO) was conducted to identify empirical studies of clinician populations. Search terms were focused to identify studies reporting clinician emotion OR clinician emotional intelligence OR emotional competence AND clinical decision making OR clinical reasoning. RESULTS: Twenty three papers were retained for synthesis. These represented empirical work from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches and comprised work with a focus on experienced emotion and on skills associated with emotional intelligence. The studies examined nurses (10), physicians (7), occupational therapists (1), physiotherapists (1), mixed clinician samples (3), and unspecified infectious disease experts (1). We identified two main themes in the context of clinical decision making: the subjective experience of emotion; and, the application of emotion and cognition in CDM. Sub-themes under the subjective experience of emotion were: emotional response to contextual pressures; emotional responses to others; and, intentional exclusion of emotion from CDM. Under the application of emotion and cognition in CDM, sub-themes were: compassionate emotional labour – responsiveness to patient emotion within CDM; interdisciplinary tension regarding the significance and meaning of emotion in CDM; and, emotion and moral judgement. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians’ experienced emotions can and do affect clinical decision making, although acknowledgement of that is far from universal. Importantly, this occurs in the in the absence of a clear theoretical framework and educational preparation may not reflect the importance of emotional competence to effective CDM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5732402/ /pubmed/29246213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kozlowski, Desirée Hutchinson, Marie Hurley, John Rowley, Joanne Sutherland, Joanna The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review |
title | The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review |
title_full | The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review |
title_fullStr | The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review |
title_short | The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review |
title_sort | role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kozlowskidesiree theroleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview AT hutchinsonmarie theroleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview AT hurleyjohn theroleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview AT rowleyjoanne theroleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview AT sutherlandjoanna theroleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview AT kozlowskidesiree roleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview AT hutchinsonmarie roleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview AT hurleyjohn roleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview AT rowleyjoanne roleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview AT sutherlandjoanna roleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview |