Cargando…

The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, clinical decision making has been perceived as a purely rational and cognitive process. Recently, a number of authors have linked emotional intelligence (EI) to clinical decision making (CDM) and calls have been made for an increased focus on EI skills for clinicians. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozlowski, Desirée, Hutchinson, Marie, Hurley, John, Rowley, Joanne, Sutherland, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7
_version_ 1783286688833863680
author Kozlowski, Desirée
Hutchinson, Marie
Hurley, John
Rowley, Joanne
Sutherland, Joanna
author_facet Kozlowski, Desirée
Hutchinson, Marie
Hurley, John
Rowley, Joanne
Sutherland, Joanna
author_sort Kozlowski, Desirée
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditionally, clinical decision making has been perceived as a purely rational and cognitive process. Recently, a number of authors have linked emotional intelligence (EI) to clinical decision making (CDM) and calls have been made for an increased focus on EI skills for clinicians. The objective of this integrative literature review was to identify and synthesise the empirical evidence for a role of emotion in CDM. METHODS: A systematic search of the bibliographic databases PubMed, PsychINFO, and CINAHL (EBSCO) was conducted to identify empirical studies of clinician populations. Search terms were focused to identify studies reporting clinician emotion OR clinician emotional intelligence OR emotional competence AND clinical decision making OR clinical reasoning. RESULTS: Twenty three papers were retained for synthesis. These represented empirical work from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches and comprised work with a focus on experienced emotion and on skills associated with emotional intelligence. The studies examined nurses (10), physicians (7), occupational therapists (1), physiotherapists (1), mixed clinician samples (3), and unspecified infectious disease experts (1). We identified two main themes in the context of clinical decision making: the subjective experience of emotion; and, the application of emotion and cognition in CDM. Sub-themes under the subjective experience of emotion were: emotional response to contextual pressures; emotional responses to others; and, intentional exclusion of emotion from CDM. Under the application of emotion and cognition in CDM, sub-themes were: compassionate emotional labour – responsiveness to patient emotion within CDM; interdisciplinary tension regarding the significance and meaning of emotion in CDM; and, emotion and moral judgement. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians’ experienced emotions can and do affect clinical decision making, although acknowledgement of that is far from universal. Importantly, this occurs in the in the absence of a clear theoretical framework and educational preparation may not reflect the importance of emotional competence to effective CDM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5732402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57324022017-12-21 The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review Kozlowski, Desirée Hutchinson, Marie Hurley, John Rowley, Joanne Sutherland, Joanna BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Traditionally, clinical decision making has been perceived as a purely rational and cognitive process. Recently, a number of authors have linked emotional intelligence (EI) to clinical decision making (CDM) and calls have been made for an increased focus on EI skills for clinicians. The objective of this integrative literature review was to identify and synthesise the empirical evidence for a role of emotion in CDM. METHODS: A systematic search of the bibliographic databases PubMed, PsychINFO, and CINAHL (EBSCO) was conducted to identify empirical studies of clinician populations. Search terms were focused to identify studies reporting clinician emotion OR clinician emotional intelligence OR emotional competence AND clinical decision making OR clinical reasoning. RESULTS: Twenty three papers were retained for synthesis. These represented empirical work from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches and comprised work with a focus on experienced emotion and on skills associated with emotional intelligence. The studies examined nurses (10), physicians (7), occupational therapists (1), physiotherapists (1), mixed clinician samples (3), and unspecified infectious disease experts (1). We identified two main themes in the context of clinical decision making: the subjective experience of emotion; and, the application of emotion and cognition in CDM. Sub-themes under the subjective experience of emotion were: emotional response to contextual pressures; emotional responses to others; and, intentional exclusion of emotion from CDM. Under the application of emotion and cognition in CDM, sub-themes were: compassionate emotional labour – responsiveness to patient emotion within CDM; interdisciplinary tension regarding the significance and meaning of emotion in CDM; and, emotion and moral judgement. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians’ experienced emotions can and do affect clinical decision making, although acknowledgement of that is far from universal. Importantly, this occurs in the in the absence of a clear theoretical framework and educational preparation may not reflect the importance of emotional competence to effective CDM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5732402/ /pubmed/29246213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kozlowski, Desirée
Hutchinson, Marie
Hurley, John
Rowley, Joanne
Sutherland, Joanna
The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review
title The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review
title_full The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review
title_fullStr The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review
title_full_unstemmed The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review
title_short The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review
title_sort role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kozlowskidesiree theroleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview
AT hutchinsonmarie theroleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview
AT hurleyjohn theroleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview
AT rowleyjoanne theroleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview
AT sutherlandjoanna theroleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview
AT kozlowskidesiree roleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview
AT hutchinsonmarie roleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview
AT hurleyjohn roleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview
AT rowleyjoanne roleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview
AT sutherlandjoanna roleofemotioninclinicaldecisionmakinganintegrativeliteraturereview