Cargando…
Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis
BACKGROUND: Home births in high risk pregnancies and unassisted childbirth seem to be increasing in the Netherlands. Until now there were no qualitative data on women’s motivations for these choices in the Dutch maternity care system where integrated midwifery care and home birth are regular options...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1621-0 |
_version_ | 1783286701483884544 |
---|---|
author | Hollander, Martine de Miranda, Esteriek van Dillen, Jeroen de Graaf, Irene Vandenbussche, Frank Holten, Lianne |
author_facet | Hollander, Martine de Miranda, Esteriek van Dillen, Jeroen de Graaf, Irene Vandenbussche, Frank Holten, Lianne |
author_sort | Hollander, Martine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Home births in high risk pregnancies and unassisted childbirth seem to be increasing in the Netherlands. Until now there were no qualitative data on women’s motivations for these choices in the Dutch maternity care system where integrated midwifery care and home birth are regular options in low risk pregnancies. We aimed to examine women’s motivations for birthing outside the system in order to provide medical professionals with insight and recommendations regarding their interactions with women who have birth wishes that go against medical advice. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative research design with a constructivist approach and a grounded theory method were used. In-depth interviews were performed with 28 women on their motivations for going against medical advice in choosing a high risk childbirth setting. Open, axial and selective coding of the interview data was done in order to generate themes. A focus group was held for a member check of the findings. RESULTS: Four main themes were found: 1) Discrepancy in the definition of superior knowledge, 2) Need for autonomy and trust in the birth process, 3) Conflict during negotiation of the birth plan, and 4) Search for different care. One overarching theme emerged that covered all other themes: Fear. This theme refers both to the participants’ fear (of interventions and negative consequences of their choices) and to the providers’ fear (of a bad outcome). Where for some women it was a positive choice, for the majority of women in this study the choice for a home birth in a high risk pregnancy or an unassisted childbirth was a negative one. Negative choices were due to previous or current negative experiences with maternity care and/or conflict surrounding the birth plan. CONCLUSIONS: The main goal of working with women whose birthing choices do not align with medical advice should not be to coerce them into the framework of protocols and guidelines but to prevent negative choices. Recommendations for maternity caregivers can be summarized as: 1) Rethink risk discourse, 2) Respect a woman’s trust in the birth process and her autonomous choice, 3) Have a flexible approach to negotiating the birth plan using the model of shared decision making, 4) Be aware of alternative delivery care providers and other sources of information used by women, and 5) Provide maternity care without spreading or using fear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5732454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57324542017-12-21 Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis Hollander, Martine de Miranda, Esteriek van Dillen, Jeroen de Graaf, Irene Vandenbussche, Frank Holten, Lianne BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Home births in high risk pregnancies and unassisted childbirth seem to be increasing in the Netherlands. Until now there were no qualitative data on women’s motivations for these choices in the Dutch maternity care system where integrated midwifery care and home birth are regular options in low risk pregnancies. We aimed to examine women’s motivations for birthing outside the system in order to provide medical professionals with insight and recommendations regarding their interactions with women who have birth wishes that go against medical advice. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative research design with a constructivist approach and a grounded theory method were used. In-depth interviews were performed with 28 women on their motivations for going against medical advice in choosing a high risk childbirth setting. Open, axial and selective coding of the interview data was done in order to generate themes. A focus group was held for a member check of the findings. RESULTS: Four main themes were found: 1) Discrepancy in the definition of superior knowledge, 2) Need for autonomy and trust in the birth process, 3) Conflict during negotiation of the birth plan, and 4) Search for different care. One overarching theme emerged that covered all other themes: Fear. This theme refers both to the participants’ fear (of interventions and negative consequences of their choices) and to the providers’ fear (of a bad outcome). Where for some women it was a positive choice, for the majority of women in this study the choice for a home birth in a high risk pregnancy or an unassisted childbirth was a negative one. Negative choices were due to previous or current negative experiences with maternity care and/or conflict surrounding the birth plan. CONCLUSIONS: The main goal of working with women whose birthing choices do not align with medical advice should not be to coerce them into the framework of protocols and guidelines but to prevent negative choices. Recommendations for maternity caregivers can be summarized as: 1) Rethink risk discourse, 2) Respect a woman’s trust in the birth process and her autonomous choice, 3) Have a flexible approach to negotiating the birth plan using the model of shared decision making, 4) Be aware of alternative delivery care providers and other sources of information used by women, and 5) Provide maternity care without spreading or using fear. BioMed Central 2017-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5732454/ /pubmed/29246129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1621-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hollander, Martine de Miranda, Esteriek van Dillen, Jeroen de Graaf, Irene Vandenbussche, Frank Holten, Lianne Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis |
title | Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis |
title_full | Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis |
title_fullStr | Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis |
title_short | Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis |
title_sort | women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the netherlands: a qualitative analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1621-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollandermartine womensmotivationsforchoosingahighriskbirthsettingagainstmedicaladviceinthenetherlandsaqualitativeanalysis AT demirandaesteriek womensmotivationsforchoosingahighriskbirthsettingagainstmedicaladviceinthenetherlandsaqualitativeanalysis AT vandillenjeroen womensmotivationsforchoosingahighriskbirthsettingagainstmedicaladviceinthenetherlandsaqualitativeanalysis AT degraafirene womensmotivationsforchoosingahighriskbirthsettingagainstmedicaladviceinthenetherlandsaqualitativeanalysis AT vandenbusschefrank womensmotivationsforchoosingahighriskbirthsettingagainstmedicaladviceinthenetherlandsaqualitativeanalysis AT holtenlianne womensmotivationsforchoosingahighriskbirthsettingagainstmedicaladviceinthenetherlandsaqualitativeanalysis |