Cargando…

Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment

BACKGROUND: This study sought to establish the preferences of people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) about the best outcome measure for a health and fitness intervention randomised controlled trial (RCT). The results of this study were used to inform the choice of the trial primary and secondary outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stamuli, Eugena, Torgerson, David, Northgraves, Matthew, Ronaldson, Sarah, Cherry, Lindsey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0240-3
_version_ 1783286701951549440
author Stamuli, Eugena
Torgerson, David
Northgraves, Matthew
Ronaldson, Sarah
Cherry, Lindsey
author_facet Stamuli, Eugena
Torgerson, David
Northgraves, Matthew
Ronaldson, Sarah
Cherry, Lindsey
author_sort Stamuli, Eugena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study sought to establish the preferences of people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) about the best outcome measure for a health and fitness intervention randomised controlled trial (RCT). The results of this study were used to inform the choice of the trial primary and secondary outcome measure. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to assess people’s preferences regarding a number of outcomes (foot and ankle pain, fatigue, mobility, ability to perform daily activities, choice of footwear) as well as different schedules and frequency of delivery for the health and fitness intervention. The outcomes were chosen based on literature review, clinician recommendation and patients’ focus groups. The DCE was constructed in SAS software using the D-efficiency criteria. It compared hypothetical scenarios with varying levels of outcomes severity and intervention schedule. Preference weights were estimated using appropriate econometric models. The partial log-likelihood method was used to assess the attribute importance. RESULTS: One hundred people with RA completed 18 choice sets. Overall, people selected foot and ankle pain as the most important outcome, with mobility being nearly as important. There was no evidence of differential preference between intervention schedules or frequency of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Foot and ankle pain can be considered the patient choice for primary outcome of an RCT relating to a health and fitness intervention. This study demonstrated that, by using the DCE method, it is possible to incorporate patients’ preferences at the design stage of a RCT. This approach ensures patient involvement at early stages of health care design. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-017-0240-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5732456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57324562017-12-21 Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment Stamuli, Eugena Torgerson, David Northgraves, Matthew Ronaldson, Sarah Cherry, Lindsey J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: This study sought to establish the preferences of people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) about the best outcome measure for a health and fitness intervention randomised controlled trial (RCT). The results of this study were used to inform the choice of the trial primary and secondary outcome measure. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to assess people’s preferences regarding a number of outcomes (foot and ankle pain, fatigue, mobility, ability to perform daily activities, choice of footwear) as well as different schedules and frequency of delivery for the health and fitness intervention. The outcomes were chosen based on literature review, clinician recommendation and patients’ focus groups. The DCE was constructed in SAS software using the D-efficiency criteria. It compared hypothetical scenarios with varying levels of outcomes severity and intervention schedule. Preference weights were estimated using appropriate econometric models. The partial log-likelihood method was used to assess the attribute importance. RESULTS: One hundred people with RA completed 18 choice sets. Overall, people selected foot and ankle pain as the most important outcome, with mobility being nearly as important. There was no evidence of differential preference between intervention schedules or frequency of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Foot and ankle pain can be considered the patient choice for primary outcome of an RCT relating to a health and fitness intervention. This study demonstrated that, by using the DCE method, it is possible to incorporate patients’ preferences at the design stage of a RCT. This approach ensures patient involvement at early stages of health care design. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-017-0240-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5732456/ /pubmed/29270231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0240-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Stamuli, Eugena
Torgerson, David
Northgraves, Matthew
Ronaldson, Sarah
Cherry, Lindsey
Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment
title Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment
title_full Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment
title_fullStr Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment
title_full_unstemmed Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment
title_short Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment
title_sort identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0240-3
work_keys_str_mv AT stamulieugena identifyingtheprimaryoutcomeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialinrheumatoidarthritistheroleofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT torgersondavid identifyingtheprimaryoutcomeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialinrheumatoidarthritistheroleofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT northgravesmatthew identifyingtheprimaryoutcomeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialinrheumatoidarthritistheroleofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT ronaldsonsarah identifyingtheprimaryoutcomeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialinrheumatoidarthritistheroleofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT cherrylindsey identifyingtheprimaryoutcomeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialinrheumatoidarthritistheroleofadiscretechoiceexperiment