Cargando…
Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment
BACKGROUND: This study sought to establish the preferences of people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) about the best outcome measure for a health and fitness intervention randomised controlled trial (RCT). The results of this study were used to inform the choice of the trial primary and secondary outc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0240-3 |
_version_ | 1783286701951549440 |
---|---|
author | Stamuli, Eugena Torgerson, David Northgraves, Matthew Ronaldson, Sarah Cherry, Lindsey |
author_facet | Stamuli, Eugena Torgerson, David Northgraves, Matthew Ronaldson, Sarah Cherry, Lindsey |
author_sort | Stamuli, Eugena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study sought to establish the preferences of people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) about the best outcome measure for a health and fitness intervention randomised controlled trial (RCT). The results of this study were used to inform the choice of the trial primary and secondary outcome measure. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to assess people’s preferences regarding a number of outcomes (foot and ankle pain, fatigue, mobility, ability to perform daily activities, choice of footwear) as well as different schedules and frequency of delivery for the health and fitness intervention. The outcomes were chosen based on literature review, clinician recommendation and patients’ focus groups. The DCE was constructed in SAS software using the D-efficiency criteria. It compared hypothetical scenarios with varying levels of outcomes severity and intervention schedule. Preference weights were estimated using appropriate econometric models. The partial log-likelihood method was used to assess the attribute importance. RESULTS: One hundred people with RA completed 18 choice sets. Overall, people selected foot and ankle pain as the most important outcome, with mobility being nearly as important. There was no evidence of differential preference between intervention schedules or frequency of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Foot and ankle pain can be considered the patient choice for primary outcome of an RCT relating to a health and fitness intervention. This study demonstrated that, by using the DCE method, it is possible to incorporate patients’ preferences at the design stage of a RCT. This approach ensures patient involvement at early stages of health care design. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-017-0240-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5732456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57324562017-12-21 Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment Stamuli, Eugena Torgerson, David Northgraves, Matthew Ronaldson, Sarah Cherry, Lindsey J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: This study sought to establish the preferences of people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) about the best outcome measure for a health and fitness intervention randomised controlled trial (RCT). The results of this study were used to inform the choice of the trial primary and secondary outcome measure. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to assess people’s preferences regarding a number of outcomes (foot and ankle pain, fatigue, mobility, ability to perform daily activities, choice of footwear) as well as different schedules and frequency of delivery for the health and fitness intervention. The outcomes were chosen based on literature review, clinician recommendation and patients’ focus groups. The DCE was constructed in SAS software using the D-efficiency criteria. It compared hypothetical scenarios with varying levels of outcomes severity and intervention schedule. Preference weights were estimated using appropriate econometric models. The partial log-likelihood method was used to assess the attribute importance. RESULTS: One hundred people with RA completed 18 choice sets. Overall, people selected foot and ankle pain as the most important outcome, with mobility being nearly as important. There was no evidence of differential preference between intervention schedules or frequency of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Foot and ankle pain can be considered the patient choice for primary outcome of an RCT relating to a health and fitness intervention. This study demonstrated that, by using the DCE method, it is possible to incorporate patients’ preferences at the design stage of a RCT. This approach ensures patient involvement at early stages of health care design. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-017-0240-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5732456/ /pubmed/29270231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0240-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Stamuli, Eugena Torgerson, David Northgraves, Matthew Ronaldson, Sarah Cherry, Lindsey Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment |
title | Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment |
title_full | Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment |
title_fullStr | Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment |
title_short | Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment |
title_sort | identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0240-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stamulieugena identifyingtheprimaryoutcomeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialinrheumatoidarthritistheroleofadiscretechoiceexperiment AT torgersondavid identifyingtheprimaryoutcomeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialinrheumatoidarthritistheroleofadiscretechoiceexperiment AT northgravesmatthew identifyingtheprimaryoutcomeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialinrheumatoidarthritistheroleofadiscretechoiceexperiment AT ronaldsonsarah identifyingtheprimaryoutcomeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialinrheumatoidarthritistheroleofadiscretechoiceexperiment AT cherrylindsey identifyingtheprimaryoutcomeforarandomisedcontrolledtrialinrheumatoidarthritistheroleofadiscretechoiceexperiment |