Cargando…

The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND: Nurses leaving their jobs and the profession are an issue of international concern, with supply-demand gaps for nurses reported to be widening. There is a large body of existing literature, much of which is already in review form. In order to advance the usefulness of the literature for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halter, Mary, Boiko, Olga, Pelone, Ferruccio, Beighton, Carole, Harris, Ruth, Gale, Julia, Gourlay, Stephen, Drennan, Vari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0
_version_ 1783286712385929216
author Halter, Mary
Boiko, Olga
Pelone, Ferruccio
Beighton, Carole
Harris, Ruth
Gale, Julia
Gourlay, Stephen
Drennan, Vari
author_facet Halter, Mary
Boiko, Olga
Pelone, Ferruccio
Beighton, Carole
Harris, Ruth
Gale, Julia
Gourlay, Stephen
Drennan, Vari
author_sort Halter, Mary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nurses leaving their jobs and the profession are an issue of international concern, with supply-demand gaps for nurses reported to be widening. There is a large body of existing literature, much of which is already in review form. In order to advance the usefulness of the literature for nurse and human resource managers, we undertook an overview (review of systematic reviews). The aim of the overview was to identify high quality evidence of the determinants and consequences of turnover in adult nursing. METHODS: Reviews were identified which were published between 1990 and January 2015 in English using electronic databases (the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, CINAHL plus and SCOPUS) and forward searching. All stages of the review were conducted in parallel by two reviewers. Reviews were quality appraised using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews and their findings narratively synthesised. RESULTS: Nine reviews were included. We found that the current evidence is incomplete and has a number of important limitations. However, a body of moderate quality review evidence does exist giving a picture of multiple determinants of turnover in adult nursing, with - at the individual level - nurse stress and dissatisfaction being important factors and -at the organisational level - managerial style and supervisory support factors holding most weight. The consequences of turnover are only described in economic terms, but are considered significant. CONCLUSIONS: In making a quality assessment of the review as well as considering the quality of the included primary studies and specificity in the outcomes they measure, the overview found that the evidence is not as definitive as previously presented from individual reviews. Further research is required, of rigorous research design, whether quantitative or qualitative, particularly against the outcome of actual turnover as opposed to intention to leave. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration 17 March 2015: CRD42015017613. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5732502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57325022017-12-21 The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews Halter, Mary Boiko, Olga Pelone, Ferruccio Beighton, Carole Harris, Ruth Gale, Julia Gourlay, Stephen Drennan, Vari BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Nurses leaving their jobs and the profession are an issue of international concern, with supply-demand gaps for nurses reported to be widening. There is a large body of existing literature, much of which is already in review form. In order to advance the usefulness of the literature for nurse and human resource managers, we undertook an overview (review of systematic reviews). The aim of the overview was to identify high quality evidence of the determinants and consequences of turnover in adult nursing. METHODS: Reviews were identified which were published between 1990 and January 2015 in English using electronic databases (the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, CINAHL plus and SCOPUS) and forward searching. All stages of the review were conducted in parallel by two reviewers. Reviews were quality appraised using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews and their findings narratively synthesised. RESULTS: Nine reviews were included. We found that the current evidence is incomplete and has a number of important limitations. However, a body of moderate quality review evidence does exist giving a picture of multiple determinants of turnover in adult nursing, with - at the individual level - nurse stress and dissatisfaction being important factors and -at the organisational level - managerial style and supervisory support factors holding most weight. The consequences of turnover are only described in economic terms, but are considered significant. CONCLUSIONS: In making a quality assessment of the review as well as considering the quality of the included primary studies and specificity in the outcomes they measure, the overview found that the evidence is not as definitive as previously presented from individual reviews. Further research is required, of rigorous research design, whether quantitative or qualitative, particularly against the outcome of actual turnover as opposed to intention to leave. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration 17 March 2015: CRD42015017613. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5732502/ /pubmed/29246221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Halter, Mary
Boiko, Olga
Pelone, Ferruccio
Beighton, Carole
Harris, Ruth
Gale, Julia
Gourlay, Stephen
Drennan, Vari
The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews
title The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews
title_full The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews
title_fullStr The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews
title_short The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews
title_sort determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0
work_keys_str_mv AT haltermary thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT boikoolga thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT peloneferruccio thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT beightoncarole thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT harrisruth thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT galejulia thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT gourlaystephen thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT drennanvari thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT haltermary determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT boikoolga determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT peloneferruccio determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT beightoncarole determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT harrisruth determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT galejulia determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT gourlaystephen determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT drennanvari determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews