Cargando…
The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: Nurses leaving their jobs and the profession are an issue of international concern, with supply-demand gaps for nurses reported to be widening. There is a large body of existing literature, much of which is already in review form. In order to advance the usefulness of the literature for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0 |
_version_ | 1783286712385929216 |
---|---|
author | Halter, Mary Boiko, Olga Pelone, Ferruccio Beighton, Carole Harris, Ruth Gale, Julia Gourlay, Stephen Drennan, Vari |
author_facet | Halter, Mary Boiko, Olga Pelone, Ferruccio Beighton, Carole Harris, Ruth Gale, Julia Gourlay, Stephen Drennan, Vari |
author_sort | Halter, Mary |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nurses leaving their jobs and the profession are an issue of international concern, with supply-demand gaps for nurses reported to be widening. There is a large body of existing literature, much of which is already in review form. In order to advance the usefulness of the literature for nurse and human resource managers, we undertook an overview (review of systematic reviews). The aim of the overview was to identify high quality evidence of the determinants and consequences of turnover in adult nursing. METHODS: Reviews were identified which were published between 1990 and January 2015 in English using electronic databases (the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, CINAHL plus and SCOPUS) and forward searching. All stages of the review were conducted in parallel by two reviewers. Reviews were quality appraised using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews and their findings narratively synthesised. RESULTS: Nine reviews were included. We found that the current evidence is incomplete and has a number of important limitations. However, a body of moderate quality review evidence does exist giving a picture of multiple determinants of turnover in adult nursing, with - at the individual level - nurse stress and dissatisfaction being important factors and -at the organisational level - managerial style and supervisory support factors holding most weight. The consequences of turnover are only described in economic terms, but are considered significant. CONCLUSIONS: In making a quality assessment of the review as well as considering the quality of the included primary studies and specificity in the outcomes they measure, the overview found that the evidence is not as definitive as previously presented from individual reviews. Further research is required, of rigorous research design, whether quantitative or qualitative, particularly against the outcome of actual turnover as opposed to intention to leave. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration 17 March 2015: CRD42015017613. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5732502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57325022017-12-21 The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews Halter, Mary Boiko, Olga Pelone, Ferruccio Beighton, Carole Harris, Ruth Gale, Julia Gourlay, Stephen Drennan, Vari BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Nurses leaving their jobs and the profession are an issue of international concern, with supply-demand gaps for nurses reported to be widening. There is a large body of existing literature, much of which is already in review form. In order to advance the usefulness of the literature for nurse and human resource managers, we undertook an overview (review of systematic reviews). The aim of the overview was to identify high quality evidence of the determinants and consequences of turnover in adult nursing. METHODS: Reviews were identified which were published between 1990 and January 2015 in English using electronic databases (the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, CINAHL plus and SCOPUS) and forward searching. All stages of the review were conducted in parallel by two reviewers. Reviews were quality appraised using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews and their findings narratively synthesised. RESULTS: Nine reviews were included. We found that the current evidence is incomplete and has a number of important limitations. However, a body of moderate quality review evidence does exist giving a picture of multiple determinants of turnover in adult nursing, with - at the individual level - nurse stress and dissatisfaction being important factors and -at the organisational level - managerial style and supervisory support factors holding most weight. The consequences of turnover are only described in economic terms, but are considered significant. CONCLUSIONS: In making a quality assessment of the review as well as considering the quality of the included primary studies and specificity in the outcomes they measure, the overview found that the evidence is not as definitive as previously presented from individual reviews. Further research is required, of rigorous research design, whether quantitative or qualitative, particularly against the outcome of actual turnover as opposed to intention to leave. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration 17 March 2015: CRD42015017613. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5732502/ /pubmed/29246221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Halter, Mary Boiko, Olga Pelone, Ferruccio Beighton, Carole Harris, Ruth Gale, Julia Gourlay, Stephen Drennan, Vari The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title | The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_full | The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_fullStr | The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_short | The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
title_sort | determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haltermary thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT boikoolga thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT peloneferruccio thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT beightoncarole thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT harrisruth thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT galejulia thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT gourlaystephen thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT drennanvari thedeterminantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT haltermary determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT boikoolga determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT peloneferruccio determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT beightoncarole determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT harrisruth determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT galejulia determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT gourlaystephen determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews AT drennanvari determinantsandconsequencesofadultnursingstaffturnoverasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews |