Cargando…

Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice

Nutrigenetic research examines the effects of inter-individual differences in genotype on responses to nutrients and other food components, in the context of health and of nutrient requirements. A practical application of nutrigenetics is the use of personal genetic information to guide recommendati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grimaldi, Keith A., van Ommen, Ben, Ordovas, Jose M., Parnell, Laurence D., Mathers, John C., Bendik, Igor, Brennan, Lorraine, Celis-Morales, Carlos, Cirillo, Elisa, Daniel, Hannelore, de Kok, Brenda, El-Sohemy, Ahmed, Fairweather-Tait, Susan J., Fallaize, Rosalind, Fenech, Michael, Ferguson, Lynnette R., Gibney, Eileen R., Gibney, Mike, Gjelstad, Ingrid M. F., Kaput, Jim, Karlsen, Anette S., Kolossa, Silvia, Lovegrove, Julie, Macready, Anna L., Marsaux, Cyril F. M., Alfredo Martinez, J., Milagro, Fermin, Navas-Carretero, Santiago, Roche, Helen M., Saris, Wim H. M., Traczyk, Iwona, van Kranen, Henk, Verschuren, Lars, Virgili, Fabio, Weber, Peter, Bouwman, Jildau
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-017-0584-0
_version_ 1783286716204843008
author Grimaldi, Keith A.
van Ommen, Ben
Ordovas, Jose M.
Parnell, Laurence D.
Mathers, John C.
Bendik, Igor
Brennan, Lorraine
Celis-Morales, Carlos
Cirillo, Elisa
Daniel, Hannelore
de Kok, Brenda
El-Sohemy, Ahmed
Fairweather-Tait, Susan J.
Fallaize, Rosalind
Fenech, Michael
Ferguson, Lynnette R.
Gibney, Eileen R.
Gibney, Mike
Gjelstad, Ingrid M. F.
Kaput, Jim
Karlsen, Anette S.
Kolossa, Silvia
Lovegrove, Julie
Macready, Anna L.
Marsaux, Cyril F. M.
Alfredo Martinez, J.
Milagro, Fermin
Navas-Carretero, Santiago
Roche, Helen M.
Saris, Wim H. M.
Traczyk, Iwona
van Kranen, Henk
Verschuren, Lars
Virgili, Fabio
Weber, Peter
Bouwman, Jildau
author_facet Grimaldi, Keith A.
van Ommen, Ben
Ordovas, Jose M.
Parnell, Laurence D.
Mathers, John C.
Bendik, Igor
Brennan, Lorraine
Celis-Morales, Carlos
Cirillo, Elisa
Daniel, Hannelore
de Kok, Brenda
El-Sohemy, Ahmed
Fairweather-Tait, Susan J.
Fallaize, Rosalind
Fenech, Michael
Ferguson, Lynnette R.
Gibney, Eileen R.
Gibney, Mike
Gjelstad, Ingrid M. F.
Kaput, Jim
Karlsen, Anette S.
Kolossa, Silvia
Lovegrove, Julie
Macready, Anna L.
Marsaux, Cyril F. M.
Alfredo Martinez, J.
Milagro, Fermin
Navas-Carretero, Santiago
Roche, Helen M.
Saris, Wim H. M.
Traczyk, Iwona
van Kranen, Henk
Verschuren, Lars
Virgili, Fabio
Weber, Peter
Bouwman, Jildau
author_sort Grimaldi, Keith A.
collection PubMed
description Nutrigenetic research examines the effects of inter-individual differences in genotype on responses to nutrients and other food components, in the context of health and of nutrient requirements. A practical application of nutrigenetics is the use of personal genetic information to guide recommendations for dietary choices that are more efficacious at the individual or genetic subgroup level relative to generic dietary advice. Nutrigenetics is unregulated, with no defined standards, beyond some commercially adopted codes of practice. Only a few official nutrition-related professional bodies have embraced the subject, and, consequently, there is a lack of educational resources or guidance for implementation of the outcomes of nutrigenetic research. To avoid misuse and to protect the public, personalised nutrigenetic advice and information should be based on clear evidence of validity grounded in a careful and defensible interpretation of outcomes from nutrigenetic research studies. Evidence requirements are clearly stated and assessed within the context of state-of-the-art ‘evidence-based nutrition’. We have developed and present here a draft framework that can be used to assess the strength of the evidence for scientific validity of nutrigenetic knowledge and whether ‘actionable’. In addition, we propose that this framework be used as the basis for developing transparent and scientifically sound advice to the public based on nutrigenetic tests. We feel that although this area is still in its infancy, minimal guidelines are required. Though these guidelines are based on semi-quantitative data, they should stimulate debate on their utility. This framework will be revised biennially, as knowledge on the subject increases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5732517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57325172017-12-21 Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice Grimaldi, Keith A. van Ommen, Ben Ordovas, Jose M. Parnell, Laurence D. Mathers, John C. Bendik, Igor Brennan, Lorraine Celis-Morales, Carlos Cirillo, Elisa Daniel, Hannelore de Kok, Brenda El-Sohemy, Ahmed Fairweather-Tait, Susan J. Fallaize, Rosalind Fenech, Michael Ferguson, Lynnette R. Gibney, Eileen R. Gibney, Mike Gjelstad, Ingrid M. F. Kaput, Jim Karlsen, Anette S. Kolossa, Silvia Lovegrove, Julie Macready, Anna L. Marsaux, Cyril F. M. Alfredo Martinez, J. Milagro, Fermin Navas-Carretero, Santiago Roche, Helen M. Saris, Wim H. M. Traczyk, Iwona van Kranen, Henk Verschuren, Lars Virgili, Fabio Weber, Peter Bouwman, Jildau Genes Nutr Review Nutrigenetic research examines the effects of inter-individual differences in genotype on responses to nutrients and other food components, in the context of health and of nutrient requirements. A practical application of nutrigenetics is the use of personal genetic information to guide recommendations for dietary choices that are more efficacious at the individual or genetic subgroup level relative to generic dietary advice. Nutrigenetics is unregulated, with no defined standards, beyond some commercially adopted codes of practice. Only a few official nutrition-related professional bodies have embraced the subject, and, consequently, there is a lack of educational resources or guidance for implementation of the outcomes of nutrigenetic research. To avoid misuse and to protect the public, personalised nutrigenetic advice and information should be based on clear evidence of validity grounded in a careful and defensible interpretation of outcomes from nutrigenetic research studies. Evidence requirements are clearly stated and assessed within the context of state-of-the-art ‘evidence-based nutrition’. We have developed and present here a draft framework that can be used to assess the strength of the evidence for scientific validity of nutrigenetic knowledge and whether ‘actionable’. In addition, we propose that this framework be used as the basis for developing transparent and scientifically sound advice to the public based on nutrigenetic tests. We feel that although this area is still in its infancy, minimal guidelines are required. Though these guidelines are based on semi-quantitative data, they should stimulate debate on their utility. This framework will be revised biennially, as knowledge on the subject increases. BioMed Central 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5732517/ /pubmed/29270237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-017-0584-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Grimaldi, Keith A.
van Ommen, Ben
Ordovas, Jose M.
Parnell, Laurence D.
Mathers, John C.
Bendik, Igor
Brennan, Lorraine
Celis-Morales, Carlos
Cirillo, Elisa
Daniel, Hannelore
de Kok, Brenda
El-Sohemy, Ahmed
Fairweather-Tait, Susan J.
Fallaize, Rosalind
Fenech, Michael
Ferguson, Lynnette R.
Gibney, Eileen R.
Gibney, Mike
Gjelstad, Ingrid M. F.
Kaput, Jim
Karlsen, Anette S.
Kolossa, Silvia
Lovegrove, Julie
Macready, Anna L.
Marsaux, Cyril F. M.
Alfredo Martinez, J.
Milagro, Fermin
Navas-Carretero, Santiago
Roche, Helen M.
Saris, Wim H. M.
Traczyk, Iwona
van Kranen, Henk
Verschuren, Lars
Virgili, Fabio
Weber, Peter
Bouwman, Jildau
Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice
title Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice
title_full Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice
title_fullStr Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice
title_full_unstemmed Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice
title_short Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice
title_sort proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12263-017-0584-0
work_keys_str_mv AT grimaldikeitha proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT vanommenben proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT ordovasjosem proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT parnelllaurenced proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT mathersjohnc proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT bendikigor proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT brennanlorraine proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT celismoralescarlos proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT cirilloelisa proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT danielhannelore proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT dekokbrenda proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT elsohemyahmed proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT fairweathertaitsusanj proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT fallaizerosalind proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT fenechmichael proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT fergusonlynnetter proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT gibneyeileenr proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT gibneymike proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT gjelstadingridmf proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT kaputjim proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT karlsenanettes proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT kolossasilvia proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT lovegrovejulie proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT macreadyannal proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT marsauxcyrilfm proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT alfredomartinezj proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT milagrofermin proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT navascarreterosantiago proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT rochehelenm proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT sariswimhm proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT traczykiwona proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT vankranenhenk proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT verschurenlars proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT virgilifabio proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT weberpeter proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice
AT bouwmanjildau proposedguidelinestoevaluatescientificvalidityandevidenceforgenotypebaseddietaryadvice