Cargando…

Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study

BACKGROUND: Finite element analysis (FEA) of the proximal femur has been previously validated with large mesh size, but these were insufficient to simulate the model with small implants in recent studies. This study aimed to validate the proximal femoral computed tomography (CT)-based specimen-speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miura, Michiaki, Nakamura, Junichi, Matsuura, Yusuke, Wako, Yasushi, Suzuki, Takane, Hagiwara, Shigeo, Orita, Sumihisa, Inage, Kazuhide, Kawarai, Yuya, Sugano, Masahiko, Nawata, Kento, Ohtori, Seiji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1898-1
_version_ 1783286716931506176
author Miura, Michiaki
Nakamura, Junichi
Matsuura, Yusuke
Wako, Yasushi
Suzuki, Takane
Hagiwara, Shigeo
Orita, Sumihisa
Inage, Kazuhide
Kawarai, Yuya
Sugano, Masahiko
Nawata, Kento
Ohtori, Seiji
author_facet Miura, Michiaki
Nakamura, Junichi
Matsuura, Yusuke
Wako, Yasushi
Suzuki, Takane
Hagiwara, Shigeo
Orita, Sumihisa
Inage, Kazuhide
Kawarai, Yuya
Sugano, Masahiko
Nawata, Kento
Ohtori, Seiji
author_sort Miura, Michiaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Finite element analysis (FEA) of the proximal femur has been previously validated with large mesh size, but these were insufficient to simulate the model with small implants in recent studies. This study aimed to validate the proximal femoral computed tomography (CT)-based specimen-specific FEA model with smaller mesh size using fresh frozen cadavers. METHODS: Twenty proximal femora from 10 cadavers (mean age, 87.1 years) were examined. CT was performed on all specimens with a calibration phantom. Nonlinear FEA prediction with stance configuration was performed using Mechanical Finder (mesh,1.5 mm tetrahedral elements; shell thickness, 0.2 mm; Poisson’s coefficient, 0.3), in comparison with mechanical testing. Force was applied at a fixed vertical displacement rate, and the magnitude of the applied load and displacement were continuously recorded. The fracture load and stiffness were calculated from force–displacement curve, and the correlation between mechanical testing and FEA prediction was examined. RESULTS: A pilot study with one femur revealed that the equations proposed by Keller for vertebra were the most reproducible for calculating Young’s modulus and the yield stress of elements of the proximal femur. There was a good linear correlation between fracture loads of mechanical testing and FEA prediction (R(2) = 0.6187) and between the stiffness of mechanical testing and FEA prediction (R(2) = 0.5499). There was a good linear correlation between fracture load and stiffness (R(2) = 0.6345) in mechanical testing and an excellent correlation between these (R(2) = 0.9240) in FEA prediction. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based specimen-specific FEA model of the proximal femur with small element size was validated using fresh frozen cadavers. The equations proposed by Keller for vertebra were found to be the most reproducible for the proximal femur in elderly people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5732520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57325202017-12-21 Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study Miura, Michiaki Nakamura, Junichi Matsuura, Yusuke Wako, Yasushi Suzuki, Takane Hagiwara, Shigeo Orita, Sumihisa Inage, Kazuhide Kawarai, Yuya Sugano, Masahiko Nawata, Kento Ohtori, Seiji BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Finite element analysis (FEA) of the proximal femur has been previously validated with large mesh size, but these were insufficient to simulate the model with small implants in recent studies. This study aimed to validate the proximal femoral computed tomography (CT)-based specimen-specific FEA model with smaller mesh size using fresh frozen cadavers. METHODS: Twenty proximal femora from 10 cadavers (mean age, 87.1 years) were examined. CT was performed on all specimens with a calibration phantom. Nonlinear FEA prediction with stance configuration was performed using Mechanical Finder (mesh,1.5 mm tetrahedral elements; shell thickness, 0.2 mm; Poisson’s coefficient, 0.3), in comparison with mechanical testing. Force was applied at a fixed vertical displacement rate, and the magnitude of the applied load and displacement were continuously recorded. The fracture load and stiffness were calculated from force–displacement curve, and the correlation between mechanical testing and FEA prediction was examined. RESULTS: A pilot study with one femur revealed that the equations proposed by Keller for vertebra were the most reproducible for calculating Young’s modulus and the yield stress of elements of the proximal femur. There was a good linear correlation between fracture loads of mechanical testing and FEA prediction (R(2) = 0.6187) and between the stiffness of mechanical testing and FEA prediction (R(2) = 0.5499). There was a good linear correlation between fracture load and stiffness (R(2) = 0.6345) in mechanical testing and an excellent correlation between these (R(2) = 0.9240) in FEA prediction. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based specimen-specific FEA model of the proximal femur with small element size was validated using fresh frozen cadavers. The equations proposed by Keller for vertebra were found to be the most reproducible for the proximal femur in elderly people. BioMed Central 2017-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5732520/ /pubmed/29246133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1898-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miura, Michiaki
Nakamura, Junichi
Matsuura, Yusuke
Wako, Yasushi
Suzuki, Takane
Hagiwara, Shigeo
Orita, Sumihisa
Inage, Kazuhide
Kawarai, Yuya
Sugano, Masahiko
Nawata, Kento
Ohtori, Seiji
Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study
title Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study
title_full Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study
title_fullStr Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study
title_short Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study
title_sort prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by ct-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1898-1
work_keys_str_mv AT miuramichiaki predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT nakamurajunichi predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT matsuurayusuke predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT wakoyasushi predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT suzukitakane predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT hagiwarashigeo predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT oritasumihisa predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT inagekazuhide predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT kawaraiyuya predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT suganomasahiko predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT nawatakento predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy
AT ohtoriseiji predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy