Cargando…
Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study
BACKGROUND: Finite element analysis (FEA) of the proximal femur has been previously validated with large mesh size, but these were insufficient to simulate the model with small implants in recent studies. This study aimed to validate the proximal femoral computed tomography (CT)-based specimen-speci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1898-1 |
_version_ | 1783286716931506176 |
---|---|
author | Miura, Michiaki Nakamura, Junichi Matsuura, Yusuke Wako, Yasushi Suzuki, Takane Hagiwara, Shigeo Orita, Sumihisa Inage, Kazuhide Kawarai, Yuya Sugano, Masahiko Nawata, Kento Ohtori, Seiji |
author_facet | Miura, Michiaki Nakamura, Junichi Matsuura, Yusuke Wako, Yasushi Suzuki, Takane Hagiwara, Shigeo Orita, Sumihisa Inage, Kazuhide Kawarai, Yuya Sugano, Masahiko Nawata, Kento Ohtori, Seiji |
author_sort | Miura, Michiaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Finite element analysis (FEA) of the proximal femur has been previously validated with large mesh size, but these were insufficient to simulate the model with small implants in recent studies. This study aimed to validate the proximal femoral computed tomography (CT)-based specimen-specific FEA model with smaller mesh size using fresh frozen cadavers. METHODS: Twenty proximal femora from 10 cadavers (mean age, 87.1 years) were examined. CT was performed on all specimens with a calibration phantom. Nonlinear FEA prediction with stance configuration was performed using Mechanical Finder (mesh,1.5 mm tetrahedral elements; shell thickness, 0.2 mm; Poisson’s coefficient, 0.3), in comparison with mechanical testing. Force was applied at a fixed vertical displacement rate, and the magnitude of the applied load and displacement were continuously recorded. The fracture load and stiffness were calculated from force–displacement curve, and the correlation between mechanical testing and FEA prediction was examined. RESULTS: A pilot study with one femur revealed that the equations proposed by Keller for vertebra were the most reproducible for calculating Young’s modulus and the yield stress of elements of the proximal femur. There was a good linear correlation between fracture loads of mechanical testing and FEA prediction (R(2) = 0.6187) and between the stiffness of mechanical testing and FEA prediction (R(2) = 0.5499). There was a good linear correlation between fracture load and stiffness (R(2) = 0.6345) in mechanical testing and an excellent correlation between these (R(2) = 0.9240) in FEA prediction. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based specimen-specific FEA model of the proximal femur with small element size was validated using fresh frozen cadavers. The equations proposed by Keller for vertebra were found to be the most reproducible for the proximal femur in elderly people. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5732520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57325202017-12-21 Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study Miura, Michiaki Nakamura, Junichi Matsuura, Yusuke Wako, Yasushi Suzuki, Takane Hagiwara, Shigeo Orita, Sumihisa Inage, Kazuhide Kawarai, Yuya Sugano, Masahiko Nawata, Kento Ohtori, Seiji BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Finite element analysis (FEA) of the proximal femur has been previously validated with large mesh size, but these were insufficient to simulate the model with small implants in recent studies. This study aimed to validate the proximal femoral computed tomography (CT)-based specimen-specific FEA model with smaller mesh size using fresh frozen cadavers. METHODS: Twenty proximal femora from 10 cadavers (mean age, 87.1 years) were examined. CT was performed on all specimens with a calibration phantom. Nonlinear FEA prediction with stance configuration was performed using Mechanical Finder (mesh,1.5 mm tetrahedral elements; shell thickness, 0.2 mm; Poisson’s coefficient, 0.3), in comparison with mechanical testing. Force was applied at a fixed vertical displacement rate, and the magnitude of the applied load and displacement were continuously recorded. The fracture load and stiffness were calculated from force–displacement curve, and the correlation between mechanical testing and FEA prediction was examined. RESULTS: A pilot study with one femur revealed that the equations proposed by Keller for vertebra were the most reproducible for calculating Young’s modulus and the yield stress of elements of the proximal femur. There was a good linear correlation between fracture loads of mechanical testing and FEA prediction (R(2) = 0.6187) and between the stiffness of mechanical testing and FEA prediction (R(2) = 0.5499). There was a good linear correlation between fracture load and stiffness (R(2) = 0.6345) in mechanical testing and an excellent correlation between these (R(2) = 0.9240) in FEA prediction. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based specimen-specific FEA model of the proximal femur with small element size was validated using fresh frozen cadavers. The equations proposed by Keller for vertebra were found to be the most reproducible for the proximal femur in elderly people. BioMed Central 2017-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5732520/ /pubmed/29246133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1898-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Miura, Michiaki Nakamura, Junichi Matsuura, Yusuke Wako, Yasushi Suzuki, Takane Hagiwara, Shigeo Orita, Sumihisa Inage, Kazuhide Kawarai, Yuya Sugano, Masahiko Nawata, Kento Ohtori, Seiji Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study |
title | Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study |
title_full | Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study |
title_fullStr | Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study |
title_short | Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study |
title_sort | prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by ct-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1898-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miuramichiaki predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT nakamurajunichi predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT matsuurayusuke predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT wakoyasushi predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT suzukitakane predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT hagiwarashigeo predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT oritasumihisa predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT inagekazuhide predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT kawaraiyuya predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT suganomasahiko predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT nawatakento predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy AT ohtoriseiji predictionoffractureloadandstiffnessoftheproximalfemurbyctbasedspecimenspecificfiniteelementanalysiscadavericvalidationstudy |