Cargando…

Improved spirometric detection of small airway narrowing: concavity in the expiratory flow–volume curve in people aged over 40 years

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We have explored whether assessing the degree of concavity in the descending limb of the maximum expiratory flow–volume curve enhanced spirometric detection of early small airway disease. METHODS: We used spirometry records from 890 individuals aged ≥40 years (mean 59 years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johns, David P, Das, Aruneema, Toelle, Brett G, Abramson, Michael J, Marks, Guy B, Wood-Baker, Richard, Walters, E Haydn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29263661
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S150280
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We have explored whether assessing the degree of concavity in the descending limb of the maximum expiratory flow–volume curve enhanced spirometric detection of early small airway disease. METHODS: We used spirometry records from 890 individuals aged ≥40 years (mean 59 years), recruited for the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Australia study. Central and peripheral concavity indices were developed from forced expired flows at 50% and 75% of the forced vital capacity, respectively, using an ideal line joining peak flow to zero flow. RESULTS: From the 268 subjects classified as normal never smokers, mean values for post-bronchodilator central concavity were 18.6% in males and 9.1% in females and those for peripheral concavity were 50.5% in males and 52.4% in females. There were moderately strong correlations between concavity and forced expired ratio (forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity) and mid-flow rate (forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the FVC [FEF(25%–75%)]; r=−0.70 to −0.79). The additional number of individuals detected as abnormal using the concavity indices was substantial, especially compared with FEF(25%–75%), where it was approximately doubled. Concavity was more specific for symptoms. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of these concavity measures in the routine reports of spirometry would add information on small airway obstruction at no extra cost, time, or effort.