Cargando…
Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making
BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is an elective, preference-sensitive decision made during a stressful, time-pressured period after a cancer diagnosis. Shared decision making (SDM) can improve decision quality about preference-sensitive choices. Stakeholders’ perspectives on w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29263969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001569 |
_version_ | 1783286753117863936 |
---|---|
author | Hasak, Jessica M. Myckatyn, Terence M. Grabinski, Victoria F. Philpott, Sydney E. Parikh, Rajiv P. Politi, Mary C. |
author_facet | Hasak, Jessica M. Myckatyn, Terence M. Grabinski, Victoria F. Philpott, Sydney E. Parikh, Rajiv P. Politi, Mary C. |
author_sort | Hasak, Jessica M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is an elective, preference-sensitive decision made during a stressful, time-pressured period after a cancer diagnosis. Shared decision making (SDM) can improve decision quality about preference-sensitive choices. Stakeholders’ perspectives on ways to support PMBR decision-making were explored. METHODS: Forty semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (20 postmastectomy patients, 10 PMBR surgeons, 10 PMBR nurses) were conducted. Clinicians were recruited from diverse practices across the United States. Patients were recruited using purposive sampling with varying PMBR experiences, including no reconstruction. The interview guide was based on an implementation research framework. Themes were identified using grounded theory approach, based on frequency and emotive force conveyed. RESULTS: Engagement in SDM was variable. Some patients wanted more information about PMBR from clinicians, particularly about risks. Some clinicians acknowledged highlighting benefits and downplaying risks. Many patients felt pressured to make a choice by their clinicians. Clinicians who successfully engaged patients through decisions often used outside resources to supplement conversations. CONCLUSIONS: Patient–clinician trust was critical to high-quality decisions, and many patients expressed decision regret when they were not engaged in PMBR discussions. Patients often perceived a race- or age-related bias in clinician information sharing. Interventions to support SDM may enhance decision quality and reduce decision regret about PMBR, ultimately improving patient-centered care for women with breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5732675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57326752017-12-20 Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making Hasak, Jessica M. Myckatyn, Terence M. Grabinski, Victoria F. Philpott, Sydney E. Parikh, Rajiv P. Politi, Mary C. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is an elective, preference-sensitive decision made during a stressful, time-pressured period after a cancer diagnosis. Shared decision making (SDM) can improve decision quality about preference-sensitive choices. Stakeholders’ perspectives on ways to support PMBR decision-making were explored. METHODS: Forty semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (20 postmastectomy patients, 10 PMBR surgeons, 10 PMBR nurses) were conducted. Clinicians were recruited from diverse practices across the United States. Patients were recruited using purposive sampling with varying PMBR experiences, including no reconstruction. The interview guide was based on an implementation research framework. Themes were identified using grounded theory approach, based on frequency and emotive force conveyed. RESULTS: Engagement in SDM was variable. Some patients wanted more information about PMBR from clinicians, particularly about risks. Some clinicians acknowledged highlighting benefits and downplaying risks. Many patients felt pressured to make a choice by their clinicians. Clinicians who successfully engaged patients through decisions often used outside resources to supplement conversations. CONCLUSIONS: Patient–clinician trust was critical to high-quality decisions, and many patients expressed decision regret when they were not engaged in PMBR discussions. Patients often perceived a race- or age-related bias in clinician information sharing. Interventions to support SDM may enhance decision quality and reduce decision regret about PMBR, ultimately improving patient-centered care for women with breast cancer. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5732675/ /pubmed/29263969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001569 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hasak, Jessica M. Myckatyn, Terence M. Grabinski, Victoria F. Philpott, Sydney E. Parikh, Rajiv P. Politi, Mary C. Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making |
title | Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making |
title_full | Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making |
title_fullStr | Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making |
title_short | Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making |
title_sort | stakeholders’ perspectives on postmastectomy breast reconstruction: recognizing ways to improve shared decision making |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29263969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001569 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasakjessicam stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking AT myckatynterencem stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking AT grabinskivictoriaf stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking AT philpottsydneye stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking AT parikhrajivp stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking AT politimaryc stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking |