Cargando…

Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making

BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is an elective, preference-sensitive decision made during a stressful, time-pressured period after a cancer diagnosis. Shared decision making (SDM) can improve decision quality about preference-sensitive choices. Stakeholders’ perspectives on w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasak, Jessica M., Myckatyn, Terence M., Grabinski, Victoria F., Philpott, Sydney E., Parikh, Rajiv P., Politi, Mary C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29263969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001569
_version_ 1783286753117863936
author Hasak, Jessica M.
Myckatyn, Terence M.
Grabinski, Victoria F.
Philpott, Sydney E.
Parikh, Rajiv P.
Politi, Mary C.
author_facet Hasak, Jessica M.
Myckatyn, Terence M.
Grabinski, Victoria F.
Philpott, Sydney E.
Parikh, Rajiv P.
Politi, Mary C.
author_sort Hasak, Jessica M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is an elective, preference-sensitive decision made during a stressful, time-pressured period after a cancer diagnosis. Shared decision making (SDM) can improve decision quality about preference-sensitive choices. Stakeholders’ perspectives on ways to support PMBR decision-making were explored. METHODS: Forty semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (20 postmastectomy patients, 10 PMBR surgeons, 10 PMBR nurses) were conducted. Clinicians were recruited from diverse practices across the United States. Patients were recruited using purposive sampling with varying PMBR experiences, including no reconstruction. The interview guide was based on an implementation research framework. Themes were identified using grounded theory approach, based on frequency and emotive force conveyed. RESULTS: Engagement in SDM was variable. Some patients wanted more information about PMBR from clinicians, particularly about risks. Some clinicians acknowledged highlighting benefits and downplaying risks. Many patients felt pressured to make a choice by their clinicians. Clinicians who successfully engaged patients through decisions often used outside resources to supplement conversations. CONCLUSIONS: Patient–clinician trust was critical to high-quality decisions, and many patients expressed decision regret when they were not engaged in PMBR discussions. Patients often perceived a race- or age-related bias in clinician information sharing. Interventions to support SDM may enhance decision quality and reduce decision regret about PMBR, ultimately improving patient-centered care for women with breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5732675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57326752017-12-20 Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making Hasak, Jessica M. Myckatyn, Terence M. Grabinski, Victoria F. Philpott, Sydney E. Parikh, Rajiv P. Politi, Mary C. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is an elective, preference-sensitive decision made during a stressful, time-pressured period after a cancer diagnosis. Shared decision making (SDM) can improve decision quality about preference-sensitive choices. Stakeholders’ perspectives on ways to support PMBR decision-making were explored. METHODS: Forty semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (20 postmastectomy patients, 10 PMBR surgeons, 10 PMBR nurses) were conducted. Clinicians were recruited from diverse practices across the United States. Patients were recruited using purposive sampling with varying PMBR experiences, including no reconstruction. The interview guide was based on an implementation research framework. Themes were identified using grounded theory approach, based on frequency and emotive force conveyed. RESULTS: Engagement in SDM was variable. Some patients wanted more information about PMBR from clinicians, particularly about risks. Some clinicians acknowledged highlighting benefits and downplaying risks. Many patients felt pressured to make a choice by their clinicians. Clinicians who successfully engaged patients through decisions often used outside resources to supplement conversations. CONCLUSIONS: Patient–clinician trust was critical to high-quality decisions, and many patients expressed decision regret when they were not engaged in PMBR discussions. Patients often perceived a race- or age-related bias in clinician information sharing. Interventions to support SDM may enhance decision quality and reduce decision regret about PMBR, ultimately improving patient-centered care for women with breast cancer. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5732675/ /pubmed/29263969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001569 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hasak, Jessica M.
Myckatyn, Terence M.
Grabinski, Victoria F.
Philpott, Sydney E.
Parikh, Rajiv P.
Politi, Mary C.
Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making
title Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making
title_full Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making
title_fullStr Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making
title_short Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making
title_sort stakeholders’ perspectives on postmastectomy breast reconstruction: recognizing ways to improve shared decision making
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29263969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001569
work_keys_str_mv AT hasakjessicam stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking
AT myckatynterencem stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking
AT grabinskivictoriaf stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking
AT philpottsydneye stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking
AT parikhrajivp stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking
AT politimaryc stakeholdersperspectivesonpostmastectomybreastreconstructionrecognizingwaystoimproveshareddecisionmaking