Cargando…

Laparoscopic Harvest of the Rectus Abdominis for Perineal Reconstruction

The rectus abdominis is a workhorse flap for perineal reconstruction, in particular after abdominoperineal resection (APR). Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for abdominoperineal surgery are becoming more common. The open harvest of the rectus abdominis negates the advantages of these minimally in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agochukwu, Nneamaka, Bonaroti, Alisha, Beck, Sandra, Liau, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29263976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001581
_version_ 1783286754817605632
author Agochukwu, Nneamaka
Bonaroti, Alisha
Beck, Sandra
Liau, James
author_facet Agochukwu, Nneamaka
Bonaroti, Alisha
Beck, Sandra
Liau, James
author_sort Agochukwu, Nneamaka
collection PubMed
description The rectus abdominis is a workhorse flap for perineal reconstruction, in particular after abdominoperineal resection (APR). Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for abdominoperineal surgery are becoming more common. The open harvest of the rectus abdominis negates the advantages of these minimally invasive approaches. (Sentence relating to advantages of laparoscopic rectus deleted here.) We present our early experience with laparoscopic harvest of the rectus muscle for perineal reconstruction. Three laparoscopic unilateral rectus abdominis muscle harvests were performed for perineal reconstruction following minimally invasive colorectal and urological procedures. The 2 patients who underwent APR also had planned external perineal skin reconstruction with local flaps. (Sentence deleted here to shorten abstract.) All rectus muscle harvests were performed laparoscopically. Two were for perineal reconstruction following laparoscopic APR, and 1 was for anterior vaginal wall reconstruction. This was done with 4 ports positioned on the contralateral abdomen. The average laparoscopic harvest time was 60–90 minutes. The rectus muscle remained viable in all cases. One patient developed partial necrosis of a posterior thigh fasciocutaneous flap after cancer recurrence. There were no pelvic abscesses, or abdominal wall hernias. Laparoscopic harvest of the rectus appears to be a cost-effective, reliable, and reproducible procedure for perineal with minimal donor-site morbidity. Larger clinical studies are needed to further establish the efficacy and advantages of the laparoscopic rectus for perineal reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5732682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57326822017-12-20 Laparoscopic Harvest of the Rectus Abdominis for Perineal Reconstruction Agochukwu, Nneamaka Bonaroti, Alisha Beck, Sandra Liau, James Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Ideas and Innovations The rectus abdominis is a workhorse flap for perineal reconstruction, in particular after abdominoperineal resection (APR). Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for abdominoperineal surgery are becoming more common. The open harvest of the rectus abdominis negates the advantages of these minimally invasive approaches. (Sentence relating to advantages of laparoscopic rectus deleted here.) We present our early experience with laparoscopic harvest of the rectus muscle for perineal reconstruction. Three laparoscopic unilateral rectus abdominis muscle harvests were performed for perineal reconstruction following minimally invasive colorectal and urological procedures. The 2 patients who underwent APR also had planned external perineal skin reconstruction with local flaps. (Sentence deleted here to shorten abstract.) All rectus muscle harvests were performed laparoscopically. Two were for perineal reconstruction following laparoscopic APR, and 1 was for anterior vaginal wall reconstruction. This was done with 4 ports positioned on the contralateral abdomen. The average laparoscopic harvest time was 60–90 minutes. The rectus muscle remained viable in all cases. One patient developed partial necrosis of a posterior thigh fasciocutaneous flap after cancer recurrence. There were no pelvic abscesses, or abdominal wall hernias. Laparoscopic harvest of the rectus appears to be a cost-effective, reliable, and reproducible procedure for perineal with minimal donor-site morbidity. Larger clinical studies are needed to further establish the efficacy and advantages of the laparoscopic rectus for perineal reconstruction. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5732682/ /pubmed/29263976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001581 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Ideas and Innovations
Agochukwu, Nneamaka
Bonaroti, Alisha
Beck, Sandra
Liau, James
Laparoscopic Harvest of the Rectus Abdominis for Perineal Reconstruction
title Laparoscopic Harvest of the Rectus Abdominis for Perineal Reconstruction
title_full Laparoscopic Harvest of the Rectus Abdominis for Perineal Reconstruction
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Harvest of the Rectus Abdominis for Perineal Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Harvest of the Rectus Abdominis for Perineal Reconstruction
title_short Laparoscopic Harvest of the Rectus Abdominis for Perineal Reconstruction
title_sort laparoscopic harvest of the rectus abdominis for perineal reconstruction
topic Ideas and Innovations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29263976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001581
work_keys_str_mv AT agochukwunneamaka laparoscopicharvestoftherectusabdominisforperinealreconstruction
AT bonarotialisha laparoscopicharvestoftherectusabdominisforperinealreconstruction
AT becksandra laparoscopicharvestoftherectusabdominisforperinealreconstruction
AT liaujames laparoscopicharvestoftherectusabdominisforperinealreconstruction