Cargando…

Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a SEER population based study

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) represents 5.3% of in situ specimens, and is thought to carry a low risk for developing to the invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC). There is still no standard care approach for patients with LCIS. We aimed to define the impacts of surgical and radiation intervention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Pu, Huang, Qi, Shou, Jiafeng, Hu, Guoming, Han, Mengjiao, Huang, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29262543
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21461
_version_ 1783286761498083328
author Cheng, Pu
Huang, Qi
Shou, Jiafeng
Hu, Guoming
Han, Mengjiao
Huang, Jian
author_facet Cheng, Pu
Huang, Qi
Shou, Jiafeng
Hu, Guoming
Han, Mengjiao
Huang, Jian
author_sort Cheng, Pu
collection PubMed
description Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) represents 5.3% of in situ specimens, and is thought to carry a low risk for developing to the invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC). There is still no standard care approach for patients with LCIS. We aimed to define the impacts of surgical and radiation intervention on survival outcomes of LCIS. LCIS cases from 2004 to 2013 of the recent Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were analyzed. Clinicopathologic features were analyzed in 16002 patients between 2004 and 2013. Treatment modalities included no surgery (NS), lumpectomy alone (LA), lumpectomy with radiation treatment (LRT), mastectomy alone (MA) and mastectomy with radiation treatment (MRT). The overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the variables of treatment, race, hormone receptor status, grade and age. Among 16002 patients, median follow-up was 54 months. Patients treated with LA had superior OS for NS (P = 0.001), MA (P < 0.001) and MRT P = 0.018). LRT only had superior OS for MRT (P = 0.009). There was no statistically significance between LA and LRT (P = 0.317). Improved OS was also correlated with younger age (P < 0.001), progesterone receptor positive (P = 0.001). Black patients had the worst OS (P < 0.001). There was no obvious survival difference among grade groups (P = 0.536). The LCIS patients treated with LA or LRT had better survival comparing with other groups. Considering the medical expense and the risk of radiotherapy, LA may be the most appropriate therapy for patients with LCIS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5732709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57327092017-12-19 Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a SEER population based study Cheng, Pu Huang, Qi Shou, Jiafeng Hu, Guoming Han, Mengjiao Huang, Jian Oncotarget Research Paper Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) represents 5.3% of in situ specimens, and is thought to carry a low risk for developing to the invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC). There is still no standard care approach for patients with LCIS. We aimed to define the impacts of surgical and radiation intervention on survival outcomes of LCIS. LCIS cases from 2004 to 2013 of the recent Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were analyzed. Clinicopathologic features were analyzed in 16002 patients between 2004 and 2013. Treatment modalities included no surgery (NS), lumpectomy alone (LA), lumpectomy with radiation treatment (LRT), mastectomy alone (MA) and mastectomy with radiation treatment (MRT). The overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the variables of treatment, race, hormone receptor status, grade and age. Among 16002 patients, median follow-up was 54 months. Patients treated with LA had superior OS for NS (P = 0.001), MA (P < 0.001) and MRT P = 0.018). LRT only had superior OS for MRT (P = 0.009). There was no statistically significance between LA and LRT (P = 0.317). Improved OS was also correlated with younger age (P < 0.001), progesterone receptor positive (P = 0.001). Black patients had the worst OS (P < 0.001). There was no obvious survival difference among grade groups (P = 0.536). The LCIS patients treated with LA or LRT had better survival comparing with other groups. Considering the medical expense and the risk of radiotherapy, LA may be the most appropriate therapy for patients with LCIS. Impact Journals LLC 2017-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5732709/ /pubmed/29262543 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21461 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Cheng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Cheng, Pu
Huang, Qi
Shou, Jiafeng
Hu, Guoming
Han, Mengjiao
Huang, Jian
Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a SEER population based study
title Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a SEER population based study
title_full Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a SEER population based study
title_fullStr Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a SEER population based study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a SEER population based study
title_short Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a SEER population based study
title_sort treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a seer population based study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29262543
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21461
work_keys_str_mv AT chengpu treatmentandsurvivaloutcomesoflobularcarcinomainsituofthebreastaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT huangqi treatmentandsurvivaloutcomesoflobularcarcinomainsituofthebreastaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT shoujiafeng treatmentandsurvivaloutcomesoflobularcarcinomainsituofthebreastaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT huguoming treatmentandsurvivaloutcomesoflobularcarcinomainsituofthebreastaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT hanmengjiao treatmentandsurvivaloutcomesoflobularcarcinomainsituofthebreastaseerpopulationbasedstudy
AT huangjian treatmentandsurvivaloutcomesoflobularcarcinomainsituofthebreastaseerpopulationbasedstudy