Cargando…
The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery
Both motor imagery and mirror training have been used in motor rehabilitation settings to promote skill learning and plasticity. As motor imagery and mirror training are suggested to be closely linked, it was hypothesized that mirror training augmented by motor imagery would increase corticospinal e...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29311869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00601 |
_version_ | 1783286799641083904 |
---|---|
author | van de Ruit, Mark Grey, Michael J. |
author_facet | van de Ruit, Mark Grey, Michael J. |
author_sort | van de Ruit, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | Both motor imagery and mirror training have been used in motor rehabilitation settings to promote skill learning and plasticity. As motor imagery and mirror training are suggested to be closely linked, it was hypothesized that mirror training augmented by motor imagery would increase corticospinal excitability (CSE) significantly compared to mirror training alone. Forty-four participants were split over two experimental groups. Each participant visited the laboratory once to receive either mirror training alone or mirror training augmented with layered stimulus response training (LSRT), a type of motor imagery training. Participants performed 16 min of mirror training, making repetitive grasping movements paced by a metronome. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping was performed before and after the mirror training to test for changes in CSE of the untrained hand. Self-reports suggested that the imagery training was effective in helping the participant to perform the mirror training task as instructed. Nonetheless, neither training type resulted in a significant change of TMS map area, nor was there an interaction between the groups. The results from the study revealed no effect of a single session of 16 min of either mirror training or mirror training enhanced by imagery on TMS map area. Despite the negative result of the present experiment, this does not suggest that either motor imagery or mirror training might be ineffective as a rehabilitation therapy. Further study is required to allow disentangling the role of imagery and action observation in mirror training so that mirror training can be further tailored to the individual according to their abilities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5732933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57329332018-01-08 The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery van de Ruit, Mark Grey, Michael J. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Both motor imagery and mirror training have been used in motor rehabilitation settings to promote skill learning and plasticity. As motor imagery and mirror training are suggested to be closely linked, it was hypothesized that mirror training augmented by motor imagery would increase corticospinal excitability (CSE) significantly compared to mirror training alone. Forty-four participants were split over two experimental groups. Each participant visited the laboratory once to receive either mirror training alone or mirror training augmented with layered stimulus response training (LSRT), a type of motor imagery training. Participants performed 16 min of mirror training, making repetitive grasping movements paced by a metronome. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping was performed before and after the mirror training to test for changes in CSE of the untrained hand. Self-reports suggested that the imagery training was effective in helping the participant to perform the mirror training task as instructed. Nonetheless, neither training type resulted in a significant change of TMS map area, nor was there an interaction between the groups. The results from the study revealed no effect of a single session of 16 min of either mirror training or mirror training enhanced by imagery on TMS map area. Despite the negative result of the present experiment, this does not suggest that either motor imagery or mirror training might be ineffective as a rehabilitation therapy. Further study is required to allow disentangling the role of imagery and action observation in mirror training so that mirror training can be further tailored to the individual according to their abilities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5732933/ /pubmed/29311869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00601 Text en Copyright © 2017 van de Ruit and Grey. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience van de Ruit, Mark Grey, Michael J. The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery |
title | The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery |
title_full | The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery |
title_fullStr | The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery |
title_full_unstemmed | The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery |
title_short | The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery |
title_sort | tms motor map does not change following a single session of mirror training either with or without motor imagery |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29311869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00601 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderuitmark thetmsmotormapdoesnotchangefollowingasinglesessionofmirrortrainingeitherwithorwithoutmotorimagery AT greymichaelj thetmsmotormapdoesnotchangefollowingasinglesessionofmirrortrainingeitherwithorwithoutmotorimagery AT vanderuitmark tmsmotormapdoesnotchangefollowingasinglesessionofmirrortrainingeitherwithorwithoutmotorimagery AT greymichaelj tmsmotormapdoesnotchangefollowingasinglesessionofmirrortrainingeitherwithorwithoutmotorimagery |