Cargando…
Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance?
Under current Australian regulation, life insurance companies can require applicants to disclose all genetic test results, including results from research or direct-to-consumer tests. Life insurers can then use this genetic information in underwriting and policy decisions for mutually rated products...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29322039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00330 |
_version_ | 1783286880201080832 |
---|---|
author | Tiller, Jane Otlowski, Margaret Lacaze, Paul |
author_facet | Tiller, Jane Otlowski, Margaret Lacaze, Paul |
author_sort | Tiller, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Under current Australian regulation, life insurance companies can require applicants to disclose all genetic test results, including results from research or direct-to-consumer tests. Life insurers can then use this genetic information in underwriting and policy decisions for mutually rated products, including life, permanent disability, and total income protection insurance. Over the past decade, many countries have implemented moratoria or legislative bans on the use of genetic information by life insurers. The Australian government, by contrast, has not reviewed regulation since 2005 when it failed to ensure implementation of recommendations made by the Australian Law Reform Commission. In that time, the Australian life insurance industry has been left to self-regulate its use of genetic information. As a result, insurance fears in Australia now are leading to deterred uptake of genetic testing by at-risk individuals and deterred participation in medical research, both of which have been documented. As the potential for genomic medicine grows, public trust and engagement are critical for successful implementation. Concerns around life insurance may become a barrier to the development of genomic health care, research, and public health initiatives in Australia, and the issue should be publicly addressed. We argue a moratorium on the use of genetic information by life insurers should be enacted while appropriate longer term policy is determined and implemented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5733354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57333542018-01-10 Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance? Tiller, Jane Otlowski, Margaret Lacaze, Paul Front Public Health Public Health Under current Australian regulation, life insurance companies can require applicants to disclose all genetic test results, including results from research or direct-to-consumer tests. Life insurers can then use this genetic information in underwriting and policy decisions for mutually rated products, including life, permanent disability, and total income protection insurance. Over the past decade, many countries have implemented moratoria or legislative bans on the use of genetic information by life insurers. The Australian government, by contrast, has not reviewed regulation since 2005 when it failed to ensure implementation of recommendations made by the Australian Law Reform Commission. In that time, the Australian life insurance industry has been left to self-regulate its use of genetic information. As a result, insurance fears in Australia now are leading to deterred uptake of genetic testing by at-risk individuals and deterred participation in medical research, both of which have been documented. As the potential for genomic medicine grows, public trust and engagement are critical for successful implementation. Concerns around life insurance may become a barrier to the development of genomic health care, research, and public health initiatives in Australia, and the issue should be publicly addressed. We argue a moratorium on the use of genetic information by life insurers should be enacted while appropriate longer term policy is determined and implemented. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5733354/ /pubmed/29322039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00330 Text en Copyright © 2017 Tiller, Otlowski and Lacaze. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Tiller, Jane Otlowski, Margaret Lacaze, Paul Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance? |
title | Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance? |
title_full | Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance? |
title_fullStr | Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance? |
title_short | Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance? |
title_sort | should australia ban the use of genetic test results in life insurance? |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29322039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tillerjane shouldaustraliabantheuseofgenetictestresultsinlifeinsurance AT otlowskimargaret shouldaustraliabantheuseofgenetictestresultsinlifeinsurance AT lacazepaul shouldaustraliabantheuseofgenetictestresultsinlifeinsurance |