Cargando…

Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance?

Under current Australian regulation, life insurance companies can require applicants to disclose all genetic test results, including results from research or direct-to-consumer tests. Life insurers can then use this genetic information in underwriting and policy decisions for mutually rated products...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiller, Jane, Otlowski, Margaret, Lacaze, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29322039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00330
_version_ 1783286880201080832
author Tiller, Jane
Otlowski, Margaret
Lacaze, Paul
author_facet Tiller, Jane
Otlowski, Margaret
Lacaze, Paul
author_sort Tiller, Jane
collection PubMed
description Under current Australian regulation, life insurance companies can require applicants to disclose all genetic test results, including results from research or direct-to-consumer tests. Life insurers can then use this genetic information in underwriting and policy decisions for mutually rated products, including life, permanent disability, and total income protection insurance. Over the past decade, many countries have implemented moratoria or legislative bans on the use of genetic information by life insurers. The Australian government, by contrast, has not reviewed regulation since 2005 when it failed to ensure implementation of recommendations made by the Australian Law Reform Commission. In that time, the Australian life insurance industry has been left to self-regulate its use of genetic information. As a result, insurance fears in Australia now are leading to deterred uptake of genetic testing by at-risk individuals and deterred participation in medical research, both of which have been documented. As the potential for genomic medicine grows, public trust and engagement are critical for successful implementation. Concerns around life insurance may become a barrier to the development of genomic health care, research, and public health initiatives in Australia, and the issue should be publicly addressed. We argue a moratorium on the use of genetic information by life insurers should be enacted while appropriate longer term policy is determined and implemented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5733354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57333542018-01-10 Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance? Tiller, Jane Otlowski, Margaret Lacaze, Paul Front Public Health Public Health Under current Australian regulation, life insurance companies can require applicants to disclose all genetic test results, including results from research or direct-to-consumer tests. Life insurers can then use this genetic information in underwriting and policy decisions for mutually rated products, including life, permanent disability, and total income protection insurance. Over the past decade, many countries have implemented moratoria or legislative bans on the use of genetic information by life insurers. The Australian government, by contrast, has not reviewed regulation since 2005 when it failed to ensure implementation of recommendations made by the Australian Law Reform Commission. In that time, the Australian life insurance industry has been left to self-regulate its use of genetic information. As a result, insurance fears in Australia now are leading to deterred uptake of genetic testing by at-risk individuals and deterred participation in medical research, both of which have been documented. As the potential for genomic medicine grows, public trust and engagement are critical for successful implementation. Concerns around life insurance may become a barrier to the development of genomic health care, research, and public health initiatives in Australia, and the issue should be publicly addressed. We argue a moratorium on the use of genetic information by life insurers should be enacted while appropriate longer term policy is determined and implemented. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5733354/ /pubmed/29322039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00330 Text en Copyright © 2017 Tiller, Otlowski and Lacaze. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Tiller, Jane
Otlowski, Margaret
Lacaze, Paul
Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance?
title Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance?
title_full Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance?
title_fullStr Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance?
title_full_unstemmed Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance?
title_short Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance?
title_sort should australia ban the use of genetic test results in life insurance?
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29322039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00330
work_keys_str_mv AT tillerjane shouldaustraliabantheuseofgenetictestresultsinlifeinsurance
AT otlowskimargaret shouldaustraliabantheuseofgenetictestresultsinlifeinsurance
AT lacazepaul shouldaustraliabantheuseofgenetictestresultsinlifeinsurance