Cargando…

Dual Regulation of Bacillus subtilis kinB Gene Encoding a Sporulation Trigger by SinR through Transcription Repression and Positive Stringent Transcription Control

It is known that transcription of kinB encoding a trigger for Bacillus subtilis sporulation is under repression by SinR, a master repressor of biofilm formation, and under positive stringent transcription control depending on the adenine species at the transcription initiation nucleotide (nt). Delet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujita, Yasutaro, Ogura, Mitsuo, Nii, Satomi, Hirooka, Kazutake
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321771
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02502
_version_ 1783286907839447040
author Fujita, Yasutaro
Ogura, Mitsuo
Nii, Satomi
Hirooka, Kazutake
author_facet Fujita, Yasutaro
Ogura, Mitsuo
Nii, Satomi
Hirooka, Kazutake
author_sort Fujita, Yasutaro
collection PubMed
description It is known that transcription of kinB encoding a trigger for Bacillus subtilis sporulation is under repression by SinR, a master repressor of biofilm formation, and under positive stringent transcription control depending on the adenine species at the transcription initiation nucleotide (nt). Deletion and base substitution analyses of the kinB promoter (P(kinB)) region using lacZ fusions indicated that either a 5-nt deletion (Δ5, nt -61/-57, +1 is the transcription initiation nt) or the substitution of G at nt -45 with A (G-45A) relieved kinB repression. Thus, we found a pair of SinR-binding consensus sequences (GTTCTYT; Y is T or C) in an inverted orientation (SinR-1) between nt -57/-42, which is most likely a SinR-binding site for kinB repression. This relief from SinR repression likely requires SinI, an antagonist of SinR. Surprisingly, we found that SinR is essential for positive stringent transcription control of P(kinB). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) analysis indicated that SinR bound not only to SinR-1 but also to SinR-2 (nt -29/-8) consisting of another pair of SinR consensus sequences in a tandem repeat arrangement; the two sequences partially overlap the ‘-35’ and ‘-10’ regions of P(kinB). Introduction of base substitutions (T-27C C-26T) in the upstream consensus sequence of SinR-2 affected positive stringent transcription control of P(kinB), suggesting that SinR binding to SinR-2 likely causes this positive control. EMSA also implied that RNA polymerase and SinR are possibly bound together to SinR-2 to form a transcription initiation complex for kinB transcription. Thus, it was suggested in this work that derepression of kinB from SinR repression by SinI induced by Spo0A∼P and occurrence of SinR-dependent positive stringent transcription control of kinB might induce effective sporulation cooperatively, implying an intimate interplay by stringent response, sporulation, and biofilm formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5733473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57334732018-01-10 Dual Regulation of Bacillus subtilis kinB Gene Encoding a Sporulation Trigger by SinR through Transcription Repression and Positive Stringent Transcription Control Fujita, Yasutaro Ogura, Mitsuo Nii, Satomi Hirooka, Kazutake Front Microbiol Microbiology It is known that transcription of kinB encoding a trigger for Bacillus subtilis sporulation is under repression by SinR, a master repressor of biofilm formation, and under positive stringent transcription control depending on the adenine species at the transcription initiation nucleotide (nt). Deletion and base substitution analyses of the kinB promoter (P(kinB)) region using lacZ fusions indicated that either a 5-nt deletion (Δ5, nt -61/-57, +1 is the transcription initiation nt) or the substitution of G at nt -45 with A (G-45A) relieved kinB repression. Thus, we found a pair of SinR-binding consensus sequences (GTTCTYT; Y is T or C) in an inverted orientation (SinR-1) between nt -57/-42, which is most likely a SinR-binding site for kinB repression. This relief from SinR repression likely requires SinI, an antagonist of SinR. Surprisingly, we found that SinR is essential for positive stringent transcription control of P(kinB). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) analysis indicated that SinR bound not only to SinR-1 but also to SinR-2 (nt -29/-8) consisting of another pair of SinR consensus sequences in a tandem repeat arrangement; the two sequences partially overlap the ‘-35’ and ‘-10’ regions of P(kinB). Introduction of base substitutions (T-27C C-26T) in the upstream consensus sequence of SinR-2 affected positive stringent transcription control of P(kinB), suggesting that SinR binding to SinR-2 likely causes this positive control. EMSA also implied that RNA polymerase and SinR are possibly bound together to SinR-2 to form a transcription initiation complex for kinB transcription. Thus, it was suggested in this work that derepression of kinB from SinR repression by SinI induced by Spo0A∼P and occurrence of SinR-dependent positive stringent transcription control of kinB might induce effective sporulation cooperatively, implying an intimate interplay by stringent response, sporulation, and biofilm formation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5733473/ /pubmed/29321771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02502 Text en Copyright © 2017 Fujita, Ogura, Nii and Hirooka. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Fujita, Yasutaro
Ogura, Mitsuo
Nii, Satomi
Hirooka, Kazutake
Dual Regulation of Bacillus subtilis kinB Gene Encoding a Sporulation Trigger by SinR through Transcription Repression and Positive Stringent Transcription Control
title Dual Regulation of Bacillus subtilis kinB Gene Encoding a Sporulation Trigger by SinR through Transcription Repression and Positive Stringent Transcription Control
title_full Dual Regulation of Bacillus subtilis kinB Gene Encoding a Sporulation Trigger by SinR through Transcription Repression and Positive Stringent Transcription Control
title_fullStr Dual Regulation of Bacillus subtilis kinB Gene Encoding a Sporulation Trigger by SinR through Transcription Repression and Positive Stringent Transcription Control
title_full_unstemmed Dual Regulation of Bacillus subtilis kinB Gene Encoding a Sporulation Trigger by SinR through Transcription Repression and Positive Stringent Transcription Control
title_short Dual Regulation of Bacillus subtilis kinB Gene Encoding a Sporulation Trigger by SinR through Transcription Repression and Positive Stringent Transcription Control
title_sort dual regulation of bacillus subtilis kinb gene encoding a sporulation trigger by sinr through transcription repression and positive stringent transcription control
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321771
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02502
work_keys_str_mv AT fujitayasutaro dualregulationofbacillussubtiliskinbgeneencodingasporulationtriggerbysinrthroughtranscriptionrepressionandpositivestringenttranscriptioncontrol
AT oguramitsuo dualregulationofbacillussubtiliskinbgeneencodingasporulationtriggerbysinrthroughtranscriptionrepressionandpositivestringenttranscriptioncontrol
AT niisatomi dualregulationofbacillussubtiliskinbgeneencodingasporulationtriggerbysinrthroughtranscriptionrepressionandpositivestringenttranscriptioncontrol
AT hirookakazutake dualregulationofbacillussubtiliskinbgeneencodingasporulationtriggerbysinrthroughtranscriptionrepressionandpositivestringenttranscriptioncontrol