Cargando…

Categorisation of Mobile EEG: A Researcher's Perspective

Researchers are increasingly attempting to undertake electroencephalography (EEG) recordings in novel environments and contexts outside of the traditional static laboratory setting. The term “mobile EEG,” although commonly used to describe many of these undertakings, is ambiguous, since it attempts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bateson, Anthony D., Baseler, Heidi A., Paulson, Kevin S., Ahmed, Fayyaz, Asghar, Aziz U. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5496196
_version_ 1783286949392416768
author Bateson, Anthony D.
Baseler, Heidi A.
Paulson, Kevin S.
Ahmed, Fayyaz
Asghar, Aziz U. R.
author_facet Bateson, Anthony D.
Baseler, Heidi A.
Paulson, Kevin S.
Ahmed, Fayyaz
Asghar, Aziz U. R.
author_sort Bateson, Anthony D.
collection PubMed
description Researchers are increasingly attempting to undertake electroencephalography (EEG) recordings in novel environments and contexts outside of the traditional static laboratory setting. The term “mobile EEG,” although commonly used to describe many of these undertakings, is ambiguous, since it attempts to encompass a wide range of EEG device mobility, participant mobility, and system specifications used across investigations. To provide quantitative parameters for “mobile EEG,” we developed a Categorisation of Mobile EEG (CoME) scheme based upon scoring of device mobility (D, from 0, off-body, to 5, head-mounted with no additional equipment), participant mobility (P, from 0, static, to 5, unconstrained running), system specification (S, from 4, lowest, to 20, highest), and number of channels (C) used. The CoME scheme was applied to twenty-nine published mobile EEG studies. Device mobility scores ranged from 0D to 4D, participant mobility scores from 0P to 4P, and system specification scores from 6S to 17S. The format of the scores for the four parameters is given, for example, as (2D, 4P, 17S, 32C) and readily enables comparisons across studies. Our CoME scheme enables researchers to quantify the degree of device mobility, participant mobility, and system specification used in their “mobile EEG” investigations in a standardised way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5733835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57338352018-01-18 Categorisation of Mobile EEG: A Researcher's Perspective Bateson, Anthony D. Baseler, Heidi A. Paulson, Kevin S. Ahmed, Fayyaz Asghar, Aziz U. R. Biomed Res Int Review Article Researchers are increasingly attempting to undertake electroencephalography (EEG) recordings in novel environments and contexts outside of the traditional static laboratory setting. The term “mobile EEG,” although commonly used to describe many of these undertakings, is ambiguous, since it attempts to encompass a wide range of EEG device mobility, participant mobility, and system specifications used across investigations. To provide quantitative parameters for “mobile EEG,” we developed a Categorisation of Mobile EEG (CoME) scheme based upon scoring of device mobility (D, from 0, off-body, to 5, head-mounted with no additional equipment), participant mobility (P, from 0, static, to 5, unconstrained running), system specification (S, from 4, lowest, to 20, highest), and number of channels (C) used. The CoME scheme was applied to twenty-nine published mobile EEG studies. Device mobility scores ranged from 0D to 4D, participant mobility scores from 0P to 4P, and system specification scores from 6S to 17S. The format of the scores for the four parameters is given, for example, as (2D, 4P, 17S, 32C) and readily enables comparisons across studies. Our CoME scheme enables researchers to quantify the degree of device mobility, participant mobility, and system specification used in their “mobile EEG” investigations in a standardised way. Hindawi 2017 2017-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5733835/ /pubmed/29349078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5496196 Text en Copyright © 2017 Anthony D. Bateson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Bateson, Anthony D.
Baseler, Heidi A.
Paulson, Kevin S.
Ahmed, Fayyaz
Asghar, Aziz U. R.
Categorisation of Mobile EEG: A Researcher's Perspective
title Categorisation of Mobile EEG: A Researcher's Perspective
title_full Categorisation of Mobile EEG: A Researcher's Perspective
title_fullStr Categorisation of Mobile EEG: A Researcher's Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Categorisation of Mobile EEG: A Researcher's Perspective
title_short Categorisation of Mobile EEG: A Researcher's Perspective
title_sort categorisation of mobile eeg: a researcher's perspective
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5496196
work_keys_str_mv AT batesonanthonyd categorisationofmobileeegaresearchersperspective
AT baselerheidia categorisationofmobileeegaresearchersperspective
AT paulsonkevins categorisationofmobileeegaresearchersperspective
AT ahmedfayyaz categorisationofmobileeegaresearchersperspective
AT asgharazizur categorisationofmobileeegaresearchersperspective