Cargando…

Quality of Life in Workers and Stress: Gender Differences in Exposure to Psychosocial Risks and Perceived Well-Being

BACKGROUND: Quality of working life is the result of many factors inherent in the workplace environment, especially in terms of exposure to psychosocial risks. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to assess the quality of life with special attention to gender differences. METHODS: The HSE-IT que...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Sio, Simone, Cedrone, Fabrizio, Sanità, Donatella, Ricci, Pasquale, Corbosiero, Paola, Di Traglia, Mario, Greco, Emilio, Stansfeld, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7340781
_version_ 1783286972423340032
author De Sio, Simone
Cedrone, Fabrizio
Sanità, Donatella
Ricci, Pasquale
Corbosiero, Paola
Di Traglia, Mario
Greco, Emilio
Stansfeld, Stephen
author_facet De Sio, Simone
Cedrone, Fabrizio
Sanità, Donatella
Ricci, Pasquale
Corbosiero, Paola
Di Traglia, Mario
Greco, Emilio
Stansfeld, Stephen
author_sort De Sio, Simone
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality of working life is the result of many factors inherent in the workplace environment, especially in terms of exposure to psychosocial risks. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to assess the quality of life with special attention to gender differences. METHODS: The HSE-IT questionnaire and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index were administered to a group of workers (74 males and 33 females). The authors also used Cronbach's alpha test to assess the internal consistency of both questionnaires and the Mann–Whitney test to evaluate the significance of gender differences in both questionnaires. RESULTS: The HSE-IT highlighted the existence of work-related stress in all the population with a critical perception regarding the domain “Relationships.” Furthermore, gender analysis highlighted the presence of two additional domains in the female population: “Demand” (p = 0,002) and “Support from Managers” (p = 0,287). The WHO-5 highlighted a well-being level below the standard cut-off point with a significant gender difference (p = 0.009) for males (18, SD = 6) as compared to females (14, SD = 6,4). Cronbach's alpha values indicated a high level of internal consistency for both of our scales. CONCLUSIONS: The risk assessment of quality of working life should take into due account the individual characteristics of workers, with special attention to gender.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5733932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57339322018-01-18 Quality of Life in Workers and Stress: Gender Differences in Exposure to Psychosocial Risks and Perceived Well-Being De Sio, Simone Cedrone, Fabrizio Sanità, Donatella Ricci, Pasquale Corbosiero, Paola Di Traglia, Mario Greco, Emilio Stansfeld, Stephen Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Quality of working life is the result of many factors inherent in the workplace environment, especially in terms of exposure to psychosocial risks. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to assess the quality of life with special attention to gender differences. METHODS: The HSE-IT questionnaire and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index were administered to a group of workers (74 males and 33 females). The authors also used Cronbach's alpha test to assess the internal consistency of both questionnaires and the Mann–Whitney test to evaluate the significance of gender differences in both questionnaires. RESULTS: The HSE-IT highlighted the existence of work-related stress in all the population with a critical perception regarding the domain “Relationships.” Furthermore, gender analysis highlighted the presence of two additional domains in the female population: “Demand” (p = 0,002) and “Support from Managers” (p = 0,287). The WHO-5 highlighted a well-being level below the standard cut-off point with a significant gender difference (p = 0.009) for males (18, SD = 6) as compared to females (14, SD = 6,4). Cronbach's alpha values indicated a high level of internal consistency for both of our scales. CONCLUSIONS: The risk assessment of quality of working life should take into due account the individual characteristics of workers, with special attention to gender. Hindawi 2017 2017-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5733932/ /pubmed/29349081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7340781 Text en Copyright © 2017 Simone De Sio et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
De Sio, Simone
Cedrone, Fabrizio
Sanità, Donatella
Ricci, Pasquale
Corbosiero, Paola
Di Traglia, Mario
Greco, Emilio
Stansfeld, Stephen
Quality of Life in Workers and Stress: Gender Differences in Exposure to Psychosocial Risks and Perceived Well-Being
title Quality of Life in Workers and Stress: Gender Differences in Exposure to Psychosocial Risks and Perceived Well-Being
title_full Quality of Life in Workers and Stress: Gender Differences in Exposure to Psychosocial Risks and Perceived Well-Being
title_fullStr Quality of Life in Workers and Stress: Gender Differences in Exposure to Psychosocial Risks and Perceived Well-Being
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Life in Workers and Stress: Gender Differences in Exposure to Psychosocial Risks and Perceived Well-Being
title_short Quality of Life in Workers and Stress: Gender Differences in Exposure to Psychosocial Risks and Perceived Well-Being
title_sort quality of life in workers and stress: gender differences in exposure to psychosocial risks and perceived well-being
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7340781
work_keys_str_mv AT desiosimone qualityoflifeinworkersandstressgenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialrisksandperceivedwellbeing
AT cedronefabrizio qualityoflifeinworkersandstressgenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialrisksandperceivedwellbeing
AT sanitadonatella qualityoflifeinworkersandstressgenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialrisksandperceivedwellbeing
AT riccipasquale qualityoflifeinworkersandstressgenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialrisksandperceivedwellbeing
AT corbosieropaola qualityoflifeinworkersandstressgenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialrisksandperceivedwellbeing
AT ditragliamario qualityoflifeinworkersandstressgenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialrisksandperceivedwellbeing
AT grecoemilio qualityoflifeinworkersandstressgenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialrisksandperceivedwellbeing
AT stansfeldstephen qualityoflifeinworkersandstressgenderdifferencesinexposuretopsychosocialrisksandperceivedwellbeing