Cargando…

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: In the UK, it is estimated that a disabling hearing loss (HL) affects 1 in 6 people. HL has functional, economic and social-emotional consequences for affected individuals. Intervention for HL focuses on improving access to the auditory signal using hearing aids or cochlear implants. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Sarah E, Rapport, Frances L, Boisvert, Isabelle, McMahon, Catherine M, Hutchings, Hayley A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014995
_version_ 1783287014684098560
author Hughes, Sarah E
Rapport, Frances L
Boisvert, Isabelle
McMahon, Catherine M
Hutchings, Hayley A
author_facet Hughes, Sarah E
Rapport, Frances L
Boisvert, Isabelle
McMahon, Catherine M
Hutchings, Hayley A
author_sort Hughes, Sarah E
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In the UK, it is estimated that a disabling hearing loss (HL) affects 1 in 6 people. HL has functional, economic and social-emotional consequences for affected individuals. Intervention for HL focuses on improving access to the auditory signal using hearing aids or cochlear implants. However, even if sounds are audible and speech is understood, individuals with HL often report increased effort when listening. Listening effort (LE) may be measured using self-reported measures such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are validated questionnaires completed by patients to measure their perceptions of their own functional status and well-being. When selecting a PROM for use in research or clinical practice, it is necessary to appraise the evidence of a PROM’s acceptability to patients, validity, responsiveness and reliability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of studies evaluating the measurement properties of PROMs available to measure LE in HL will be undertaken. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Web of Science will be searched electronically. Reference lists of included studies, key journals and the grey literature will be hand-searched to identify further studies for inclusion. Two reviewers will independently complete title, abstract and full-text screening to determine study eligibility. Data on the characteristics of each study and each PROM will be extracted. Methodological quality of the included studies will be appraised using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments, the quality of included PROMs appraised and the credibility of the evidence assessed. A narrative synthesis will summarise extracted data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical permission is not required, as this study uses data from published research. Dissemination will be through publication in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and the lead author’s doctoral dissertation. Findings may inform the selection of PROMs used to measure LE in HL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57341992017-12-20 Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review Hughes, Sarah E Rapport, Frances L Boisvert, Isabelle McMahon, Catherine M Hutchings, Hayley A BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology INTRODUCTION: In the UK, it is estimated that a disabling hearing loss (HL) affects 1 in 6 people. HL has functional, economic and social-emotional consequences for affected individuals. Intervention for HL focuses on improving access to the auditory signal using hearing aids or cochlear implants. However, even if sounds are audible and speech is understood, individuals with HL often report increased effort when listening. Listening effort (LE) may be measured using self-reported measures such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are validated questionnaires completed by patients to measure their perceptions of their own functional status and well-being. When selecting a PROM for use in research or clinical practice, it is necessary to appraise the evidence of a PROM’s acceptability to patients, validity, responsiveness and reliability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of studies evaluating the measurement properties of PROMs available to measure LE in HL will be undertaken. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Web of Science will be searched electronically. Reference lists of included studies, key journals and the grey literature will be hand-searched to identify further studies for inclusion. Two reviewers will independently complete title, abstract and full-text screening to determine study eligibility. Data on the characteristics of each study and each PROM will be extracted. Methodological quality of the included studies will be appraised using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments, the quality of included PROMs appraised and the credibility of the evidence assessed. A narrative synthesis will summarise extracted data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical permission is not required, as this study uses data from published research. Dissemination will be through publication in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and the lead author’s doctoral dissertation. Findings may inform the selection of PROMs used to measure LE in HL. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5734199/ /pubmed/28592576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014995 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
Hughes, Sarah E
Rapport, Frances L
Boisvert, Isabelle
McMahon, Catherine M
Hutchings, Hayley A
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review
title Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures (proms) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review
topic Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014995
work_keys_str_mv AT hughessarahe patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsforassessingperceivedlisteningeffortinhearinglossprotocolforasystematicreview
AT rapportfrancesl patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsforassessingperceivedlisteningeffortinhearinglossprotocolforasystematicreview
AT boisvertisabelle patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsforassessingperceivedlisteningeffortinhearinglossprotocolforasystematicreview
AT mcmahoncatherinem patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsforassessingperceivedlisteningeffortinhearinglossprotocolforasystematicreview
AT hutchingshayleya patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsforassessingperceivedlisteningeffortinhearinglossprotocolforasystematicreview