Cargando…

Healthcare professional perceptions of family-centred rounds in French NICUs: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding parental presence at medical rounds in French neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We hypothesised that HCPs would perceive barriers against allowing parental participation in round discussions. METHODS: This cross-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thébaud, Véronique, Lecorguillé, Marion, Roué, Jean-Michel, Sizun, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28674126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013313
_version_ 1783287016419491840
author Thébaud, Véronique
Lecorguillé, Marion
Roué, Jean-Michel
Sizun, Jacques
author_facet Thébaud, Véronique
Lecorguillé, Marion
Roué, Jean-Michel
Sizun, Jacques
author_sort Thébaud, Véronique
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding parental presence at medical rounds in French neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We hypothesised that HCPs would perceive barriers against allowing parental participation in round discussions. METHODS: This cross-sectional study approached 304 HCPs from three groups; group 1: French professionals that attended an annual French-speaking meeting of the Neonatal Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP); group 2: NICU professionals from a tertiary care academic hospital in western France; and group 3: paediatric residents from six French universities. We invited all HCPs to complete a questionnaire about medical round practices and their perceptions towards parent participation in family-centred rounds (FCRs). RESULTS: Of the 176 (58%) questionnaires returned, 159 were included in the analysis. The majority of medical rounds took place at the bedside for groups 1 and 3 (68%, 95% CI 54 to 80 and 71%, 95% CI 56 to 84, respectively) and in a conference room for group 2 (65%, 95% CI 51 to 78). Overall, respondents positively perceived FCR for themselves, parents and students. However, most respondents agreed with the following claims: ‘Parental attendance at medical rounds prevents some discussions between health professionals’ (66%, 95% CI 57 to 73), ‘FCR increases round durations’ (63%,95% CI 55 to 71) and ‘Some decisions made during medical rounds may be stressful for parents’ (51%, 95% CI 42 to 59). Nevertheless, responses varied significantly according to NIDCAP training and NICU experience and consequently group 1 displayed a significantly more positive attitude than other groups (p<0.001); they expressed less concern about potentially inhibiting discussions between HCPs (p<0.001), the feasibility (p=0.02) and prolonged round durations (p<0.001). Several difficulties and facilitators of FCR implementation were variously reported, but all groups agreed that routine workload was an important difficulty and that medical leadership would be an important facilitator. CONCLUSION: French HCPs expressed rather positive perceptions towards parental presence in NICU rounds. However, some concerns need to be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57342062017-12-20 Healthcare professional perceptions of family-centred rounds in French NICUs: a cross-sectional study Thébaud, Véronique Lecorguillé, Marion Roué, Jean-Michel Sizun, Jacques BMJ Open Paediatrics OBJECTIVE: To assess the perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding parental presence at medical rounds in French neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We hypothesised that HCPs would perceive barriers against allowing parental participation in round discussions. METHODS: This cross-sectional study approached 304 HCPs from three groups; group 1: French professionals that attended an annual French-speaking meeting of the Neonatal Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP); group 2: NICU professionals from a tertiary care academic hospital in western France; and group 3: paediatric residents from six French universities. We invited all HCPs to complete a questionnaire about medical round practices and their perceptions towards parent participation in family-centred rounds (FCRs). RESULTS: Of the 176 (58%) questionnaires returned, 159 were included in the analysis. The majority of medical rounds took place at the bedside for groups 1 and 3 (68%, 95% CI 54 to 80 and 71%, 95% CI 56 to 84, respectively) and in a conference room for group 2 (65%, 95% CI 51 to 78). Overall, respondents positively perceived FCR for themselves, parents and students. However, most respondents agreed with the following claims: ‘Parental attendance at medical rounds prevents some discussions between health professionals’ (66%, 95% CI 57 to 73), ‘FCR increases round durations’ (63%,95% CI 55 to 71) and ‘Some decisions made during medical rounds may be stressful for parents’ (51%, 95% CI 42 to 59). Nevertheless, responses varied significantly according to NIDCAP training and NICU experience and consequently group 1 displayed a significantly more positive attitude than other groups (p<0.001); they expressed less concern about potentially inhibiting discussions between HCPs (p<0.001), the feasibility (p=0.02) and prolonged round durations (p<0.001). Several difficulties and facilitators of FCR implementation were variously reported, but all groups agreed that routine workload was an important difficulty and that medical leadership would be an important facilitator. CONCLUSION: French HCPs expressed rather positive perceptions towards parental presence in NICU rounds. However, some concerns need to be addressed. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5734206/ /pubmed/28674126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013313 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Thébaud, Véronique
Lecorguillé, Marion
Roué, Jean-Michel
Sizun, Jacques
Healthcare professional perceptions of family-centred rounds in French NICUs: a cross-sectional study
title Healthcare professional perceptions of family-centred rounds in French NICUs: a cross-sectional study
title_full Healthcare professional perceptions of family-centred rounds in French NICUs: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Healthcare professional perceptions of family-centred rounds in French NICUs: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare professional perceptions of family-centred rounds in French NICUs: a cross-sectional study
title_short Healthcare professional perceptions of family-centred rounds in French NICUs: a cross-sectional study
title_sort healthcare professional perceptions of family-centred rounds in french nicus: a cross-sectional study
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28674126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013313
work_keys_str_mv AT thebaudveronique healthcareprofessionalperceptionsoffamilycentredroundsinfrenchnicusacrosssectionalstudy
AT lecorguillemarion healthcareprofessionalperceptionsoffamilycentredroundsinfrenchnicusacrosssectionalstudy
AT rouejeanmichel healthcareprofessionalperceptionsoffamilycentredroundsinfrenchnicusacrosssectionalstudy
AT sizunjacques healthcareprofessionalperceptionsoffamilycentredroundsinfrenchnicusacrosssectionalstudy