Cargando…

Fascia iliaca compartment block versus no block for pain control after lower limb surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The analgesic effect of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) versus no block (NB) after lower limb surgery (LLS) is still controversial, so we performed this meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By searching the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library (last update by July 20, 2017), r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Linyi, Li, Min, Chen, Chen, Shen, Jiang, Bu, Xiaoxuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29276404
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S149647
_version_ 1783287021948633088
author Yang, Linyi
Li, Min
Chen, Chen
Shen, Jiang
Bu, Xiaoxuan
author_facet Yang, Linyi
Li, Min
Chen, Chen
Shen, Jiang
Bu, Xiaoxuan
author_sort Yang, Linyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The analgesic effect of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) versus no block (NB) after lower limb surgery (LLS) is still controversial, so we performed this meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By searching the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library (last update by July 20, 2017), randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic effect of FICB versus NB in patients receiving LLS were identified. The primary outcome was the pain scores at 4, 12, and 24 h after LLS. The dosage of morphine at 24 h was also collected. The side effect of anesthesia was assessed according to the occurrence rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Data from 7 clinical trials that included 508 patients were summarized. The results showed that patients receiving FICB had lower pain scores at 4 h (mean difference [MD]=−1.17; 95% CI=−2.30 to −0.05; P=0.041), 12 h (MD=−0.41; 95% CI=−0.76 to −0.05; P=0.026) and 24 h (MD=−0.96; 95% CI=−1.77 to −0.15; P=0.020) after LLS. Besides, FICB could reduce the dosage of morphine at 24 h (MD=−2.06; 95% CI=−3.82 to −0.30; P=0.022) and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (relative risk rate=0.44, 95% CI=0.24–0.80, P=0.008). CONCLUSION: Compared with NB, FICB is an effective and safe method for alleviating the pain after LLS. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57342322017-12-22 Fascia iliaca compartment block versus no block for pain control after lower limb surgery: a meta-analysis Yang, Linyi Li, Min Chen, Chen Shen, Jiang Bu, Xiaoxuan J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The analgesic effect of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) versus no block (NB) after lower limb surgery (LLS) is still controversial, so we performed this meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By searching the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library (last update by July 20, 2017), randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic effect of FICB versus NB in patients receiving LLS were identified. The primary outcome was the pain scores at 4, 12, and 24 h after LLS. The dosage of morphine at 24 h was also collected. The side effect of anesthesia was assessed according to the occurrence rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Data from 7 clinical trials that included 508 patients were summarized. The results showed that patients receiving FICB had lower pain scores at 4 h (mean difference [MD]=−1.17; 95% CI=−2.30 to −0.05; P=0.041), 12 h (MD=−0.41; 95% CI=−0.76 to −0.05; P=0.026) and 24 h (MD=−0.96; 95% CI=−1.77 to −0.15; P=0.020) after LLS. Besides, FICB could reduce the dosage of morphine at 24 h (MD=−2.06; 95% CI=−3.82 to −0.30; P=0.022) and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (relative risk rate=0.44, 95% CI=0.24–0.80, P=0.008). CONCLUSION: Compared with NB, FICB is an effective and safe method for alleviating the pain after LLS. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this finding. Dove Medical Press 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5734232/ /pubmed/29276404 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S149647 Text en © 2017 Yang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yang, Linyi
Li, Min
Chen, Chen
Shen, Jiang
Bu, Xiaoxuan
Fascia iliaca compartment block versus no block for pain control after lower limb surgery: a meta-analysis
title Fascia iliaca compartment block versus no block for pain control after lower limb surgery: a meta-analysis
title_full Fascia iliaca compartment block versus no block for pain control after lower limb surgery: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Fascia iliaca compartment block versus no block for pain control after lower limb surgery: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Fascia iliaca compartment block versus no block for pain control after lower limb surgery: a meta-analysis
title_short Fascia iliaca compartment block versus no block for pain control after lower limb surgery: a meta-analysis
title_sort fascia iliaca compartment block versus no block for pain control after lower limb surgery: a meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29276404
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S149647
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglinyi fasciailiacacompartmentblockversusnoblockforpaincontrolafterlowerlimbsurgeryametaanalysis
AT limin fasciailiacacompartmentblockversusnoblockforpaincontrolafterlowerlimbsurgeryametaanalysis
AT chenchen fasciailiacacompartmentblockversusnoblockforpaincontrolafterlowerlimbsurgeryametaanalysis
AT shenjiang fasciailiacacompartmentblockversusnoblockforpaincontrolafterlowerlimbsurgeryametaanalysis
AT buxiaoxuan fasciailiacacompartmentblockversusnoblockforpaincontrolafterlowerlimbsurgeryametaanalysis