Cargando…

Assessment of the effect of an Interactive Dynamic Referral Interface (IDRI) on the quality of referral letters from general practitioners to gastroenterologists: a randomised cross-over vignette trial

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether interactive, electronic, dynamic, diagnose-specific checklists improve the quality of referral letters in gastroenterology and assessed the general practitioners’ (GPs’) acceptance of the checklists. DESIGN: Randomised cross-over vignette trial. SETTING: Primary care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskeland, Sigrun Losada, Brunborg, Cathrine, Rueegg, Corina Silvia, Aabakken, Lars, de Lange, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28667208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014636
_version_ 1783287025578803200
author Eskeland, Sigrun Losada
Brunborg, Cathrine
Rueegg, Corina Silvia
Aabakken, Lars
de Lange, Thomas
author_facet Eskeland, Sigrun Losada
Brunborg, Cathrine
Rueegg, Corina Silvia
Aabakken, Lars
de Lange, Thomas
author_sort Eskeland, Sigrun Losada
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether interactive, electronic, dynamic, diagnose-specific checklists improve the quality of referral letters in gastroenterology and assessed the general practitioners’ (GPs’) acceptance of the checklists. DESIGN: Randomised cross-over vignette trial. SETTING: Primary care in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: 25 GPs. INTERVENTION: The GPs participated in the trial and were asked to refer eight clinical vignettes in an internet-based electronic health record simulator. A referral support, consisting of dynamic diagnose-specific checklists, was created for the generation of referral letters to gastroenterologists. The GPs were randomised to refer the eight vignettes with or without the checklists. After a minimum of 3 months, they repeated the referral process with the alternative method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in quality of the referral letters between referrals with and without checklists, measured with an objective Thirty Point Score (TPS). Difference in variance in the quality of the referral letters and GPs’ acceptance of the electronic dynamic user interface. RESULTS: The mean TPS was 15.2 (95% CI 13.2 to 16.3) and 22.0 (95% CI 20.6 to 22.8) comparing referrals without and with checklist assistance (p<0.001), respectively. The coefficient of variance was 23.3% for the checklist group and 39.6% for the non-checklist group. Two-thirds (16/24) of the GPs thought they had included more relevant information in the referrals with checklists, and considered implementing this type of checklists in their clinical practices, if available. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic, diagnose-specific checklists improved the quality of referral letters significantly and reduced the variance of the TPS, indicating a more uniform quality when checklists were used. The GPs were generally positive to the checklists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57342482017-12-20 Assessment of the effect of an Interactive Dynamic Referral Interface (IDRI) on the quality of referral letters from general practitioners to gastroenterologists: a randomised cross-over vignette trial Eskeland, Sigrun Losada Brunborg, Cathrine Rueegg, Corina Silvia Aabakken, Lars de Lange, Thomas BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether interactive, electronic, dynamic, diagnose-specific checklists improve the quality of referral letters in gastroenterology and assessed the general practitioners’ (GPs’) acceptance of the checklists. DESIGN: Randomised cross-over vignette trial. SETTING: Primary care in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: 25 GPs. INTERVENTION: The GPs participated in the trial and were asked to refer eight clinical vignettes in an internet-based electronic health record simulator. A referral support, consisting of dynamic diagnose-specific checklists, was created for the generation of referral letters to gastroenterologists. The GPs were randomised to refer the eight vignettes with or without the checklists. After a minimum of 3 months, they repeated the referral process with the alternative method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in quality of the referral letters between referrals with and without checklists, measured with an objective Thirty Point Score (TPS). Difference in variance in the quality of the referral letters and GPs’ acceptance of the electronic dynamic user interface. RESULTS: The mean TPS was 15.2 (95% CI 13.2 to 16.3) and 22.0 (95% CI 20.6 to 22.8) comparing referrals without and with checklist assistance (p<0.001), respectively. The coefficient of variance was 23.3% for the checklist group and 39.6% for the non-checklist group. Two-thirds (16/24) of the GPs thought they had included more relevant information in the referrals with checklists, and considered implementing this type of checklists in their clinical practices, if available. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic, diagnose-specific checklists improved the quality of referral letters significantly and reduced the variance of the TPS, indicating a more uniform quality when checklists were used. The GPs were generally positive to the checklists. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5734248/ /pubmed/28667208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014636 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Eskeland, Sigrun Losada
Brunborg, Cathrine
Rueegg, Corina Silvia
Aabakken, Lars
de Lange, Thomas
Assessment of the effect of an Interactive Dynamic Referral Interface (IDRI) on the quality of referral letters from general practitioners to gastroenterologists: a randomised cross-over vignette trial
title Assessment of the effect of an Interactive Dynamic Referral Interface (IDRI) on the quality of referral letters from general practitioners to gastroenterologists: a randomised cross-over vignette trial
title_full Assessment of the effect of an Interactive Dynamic Referral Interface (IDRI) on the quality of referral letters from general practitioners to gastroenterologists: a randomised cross-over vignette trial
title_fullStr Assessment of the effect of an Interactive Dynamic Referral Interface (IDRI) on the quality of referral letters from general practitioners to gastroenterologists: a randomised cross-over vignette trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the effect of an Interactive Dynamic Referral Interface (IDRI) on the quality of referral letters from general practitioners to gastroenterologists: a randomised cross-over vignette trial
title_short Assessment of the effect of an Interactive Dynamic Referral Interface (IDRI) on the quality of referral letters from general practitioners to gastroenterologists: a randomised cross-over vignette trial
title_sort assessment of the effect of an interactive dynamic referral interface (idri) on the quality of referral letters from general practitioners to gastroenterologists: a randomised cross-over vignette trial
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28667208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014636
work_keys_str_mv AT eskelandsigrunlosada assessmentoftheeffectofaninteractivedynamicreferralinterfaceidrionthequalityofreferrallettersfromgeneralpractitionerstogastroenterologistsarandomisedcrossovervignettetrial
AT brunborgcathrine assessmentoftheeffectofaninteractivedynamicreferralinterfaceidrionthequalityofreferrallettersfromgeneralpractitionerstogastroenterologistsarandomisedcrossovervignettetrial
AT rueeggcorinasilvia assessmentoftheeffectofaninteractivedynamicreferralinterfaceidrionthequalityofreferrallettersfromgeneralpractitionerstogastroenterologistsarandomisedcrossovervignettetrial
AT aabakkenlars assessmentoftheeffectofaninteractivedynamicreferralinterfaceidrionthequalityofreferrallettersfromgeneralpractitionerstogastroenterologistsarandomisedcrossovervignettetrial
AT delangethomas assessmentoftheeffectofaninteractivedynamicreferralinterfaceidrionthequalityofreferrallettersfromgeneralpractitionerstogastroenterologistsarandomisedcrossovervignettetrial