Cargando…

Qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Scotland

OBJECTIVES: To analyse free-text responses from the first Scottish Cancer Patient Experience Survey (SCPES) to understand patients’ experiences of care, identify valued aspects and areas for improvement. DESIGN: Inductive thematic analysis of seven free-text comment boxes covering all stages of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cunningham, Maggie, Wells, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28619780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015726
_version_ 1783287026071633920
author Cunningham, Maggie
Wells, Mary
author_facet Cunningham, Maggie
Wells, Mary
author_sort Cunningham, Maggie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To analyse free-text responses from the first Scottish Cancer Patient Experience Survey (SCPES) to understand patients’ experiences of care, identify valued aspects and areas for improvement. DESIGN: Inductive thematic analysis of seven free-text comment boxes covering all stages of the cancer experience, from a national cohort survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult cancer patients diagnosed across all Health Boards in Scotland between July 2013 and March 2014, and who had an inpatient stay or hospital visit between January and September 2014. 2663 respondents (of n=4835 survey respondents) provided 6961 free-text comments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Positive and negative themes of patients’ experiences. Differences in the proportion of positive to negative comments by demographics. METHODS: Data were analysed as follows: (1) comments were initially categorised at a high level (eg, positive, negative, miscellaneous, etc); (2) inductive codes were derived and applied to all relevant comments; (3) codes sharing similar meaning were amalgamated into subthemes, and code frequencies were measured; (4) subthemes were mapped into overarching themes; (5) difference in the proportion of positive to negative comments by demographics were analysed using χ(2) tests. RESULTS: Participants made more positive than negative comments (1:0.78). Analysis highlighted the importance to patients of Feeling that Individual Needs Are Met and Feeling Confident Within the System. Comments also provided insight into how Processes and Structures within the system of care can negatively impact on patients’ experience. Particular issues were identified with care experiences in the lead-up to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides a detailed understanding of patients’ cancer care experiences, therefore indicating what aspects matter in those experiences. Although the majority of comments were positive, there were a significant number of negative comments, especially about the lead-up to diagnosis. Comments suggest patients would value greater integration of care from services involved in their treatment for cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57342502017-12-20 Qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Scotland Cunningham, Maggie Wells, Mary BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: To analyse free-text responses from the first Scottish Cancer Patient Experience Survey (SCPES) to understand patients’ experiences of care, identify valued aspects and areas for improvement. DESIGN: Inductive thematic analysis of seven free-text comment boxes covering all stages of the cancer experience, from a national cohort survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult cancer patients diagnosed across all Health Boards in Scotland between July 2013 and March 2014, and who had an inpatient stay or hospital visit between January and September 2014. 2663 respondents (of n=4835 survey respondents) provided 6961 free-text comments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Positive and negative themes of patients’ experiences. Differences in the proportion of positive to negative comments by demographics. METHODS: Data were analysed as follows: (1) comments were initially categorised at a high level (eg, positive, negative, miscellaneous, etc); (2) inductive codes were derived and applied to all relevant comments; (3) codes sharing similar meaning were amalgamated into subthemes, and code frequencies were measured; (4) subthemes were mapped into overarching themes; (5) difference in the proportion of positive to negative comments by demographics were analysed using χ(2) tests. RESULTS: Participants made more positive than negative comments (1:0.78). Analysis highlighted the importance to patients of Feeling that Individual Needs Are Met and Feeling Confident Within the System. Comments also provided insight into how Processes and Structures within the system of care can negatively impact on patients’ experience. Particular issues were identified with care experiences in the lead-up to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides a detailed understanding of patients’ cancer care experiences, therefore indicating what aspects matter in those experiences. Although the majority of comments were positive, there were a significant number of negative comments, especially about the lead-up to diagnosis. Comments suggest patients would value greater integration of care from services involved in their treatment for cancer. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5734250/ /pubmed/28619780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015726 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Cunningham, Maggie
Wells, Mary
Qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Scotland
title Qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Scotland
title_full Qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Scotland
title_fullStr Qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Scotland
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Scotland
title_short Qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Scotland
title_sort qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first national cancer patient experience survey in scotland
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28619780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015726
work_keys_str_mv AT cunninghammaggie qualitativeanalysisof6961freetextcommentsfromthefirstnationalcancerpatientexperiencesurveyinscotland
AT wellsmary qualitativeanalysisof6961freetextcommentsfromthefirstnationalcancerpatientexperiencesurveyinscotland