Cargando…
Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Despite the widespread acceptance of conventional treatment using composite resin in primary teeth, there is limited evidence that this approach is the best option in paediatric clinics. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) using high-viscosity glass ionomer cement has gradually beco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28698331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015542 |
_version_ | 1783287047706902528 |
---|---|
author | Ladewig, Nathalia Miranda Sahiara, Cíntia Saori Yoshioka, Laysa Olegário, Isabel Cristina Floriano, Isabela Tedesco, Tamara Kerber Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Raggio, Daniela Procida |
author_facet | Ladewig, Nathalia Miranda Sahiara, Cíntia Saori Yoshioka, Laysa Olegário, Isabel Cristina Floriano, Isabela Tedesco, Tamara Kerber Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Raggio, Daniela Procida |
author_sort | Ladewig, Nathalia Miranda |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite the widespread acceptance of conventional treatment using composite resin in primary teeth, there is limited evidence that this approach is the best option in paediatric clinics. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) using high-viscosity glass ionomer cement has gradually become more popular because it performs well in clinical studies, is easy to handle and is patient friendly. Therefore, the aim of this randomised clinical trial study is to compare the restoration longevity of conventional treatment using composite resin with that of ART in posterior primary teeth. As secondary outcomes, cost-efficacy and patient self-reported discomfort will also be tested. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Children aged 3–6 years presenting with at least one occlusal and/or occlusal-proximal cavity will be randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the dental treatment: ART (experimental group) or composite resin restoration (control group). The dental treatment will be performed at a dental care trailer located in an educational complex in Barueri/SP, Brazil. The unit of randomisation will be the child. A sample size of 240 teeth with occlusal cavities and 188 teeth with occlusal-proximal cavities has been calculated. The primary outcome will be restoration longevity, which will be clinically assessed after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months by two examiners. The duration of the dental treatment and the cost of all materials used will be considered when estimating the cost-efficacy of each treatment. Individual discomfort will be measured after each dental procedure using the Facial Scale of Wong-Baker. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial was approved by the local ethics committee from the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of São Paulo (registration no. 1.556.018). Participants will be included after their legal guardians have signed an informed consent form containing detailed information about the research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02562456; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5734398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57343982017-12-20 Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Ladewig, Nathalia Miranda Sahiara, Cíntia Saori Yoshioka, Laysa Olegário, Isabel Cristina Floriano, Isabela Tedesco, Tamara Kerber Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Raggio, Daniela Procida BMJ Open Dentistry and Oral Medicine INTRODUCTION: Despite the widespread acceptance of conventional treatment using composite resin in primary teeth, there is limited evidence that this approach is the best option in paediatric clinics. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) using high-viscosity glass ionomer cement has gradually become more popular because it performs well in clinical studies, is easy to handle and is patient friendly. Therefore, the aim of this randomised clinical trial study is to compare the restoration longevity of conventional treatment using composite resin with that of ART in posterior primary teeth. As secondary outcomes, cost-efficacy and patient self-reported discomfort will also be tested. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Children aged 3–6 years presenting with at least one occlusal and/or occlusal-proximal cavity will be randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the dental treatment: ART (experimental group) or composite resin restoration (control group). The dental treatment will be performed at a dental care trailer located in an educational complex in Barueri/SP, Brazil. The unit of randomisation will be the child. A sample size of 240 teeth with occlusal cavities and 188 teeth with occlusal-proximal cavities has been calculated. The primary outcome will be restoration longevity, which will be clinically assessed after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months by two examiners. The duration of the dental treatment and the cost of all materials used will be considered when estimating the cost-efficacy of each treatment. Individual discomfort will be measured after each dental procedure using the Facial Scale of Wong-Baker. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial was approved by the local ethics committee from the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of São Paulo (registration no. 1.556.018). Participants will be included after their legal guardians have signed an informed consent form containing detailed information about the research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02562456; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5734398/ /pubmed/28698331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015542 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Dentistry and Oral Medicine Ladewig, Nathalia Miranda Sahiara, Cíntia Saori Yoshioka, Laysa Olegário, Isabel Cristina Floriano, Isabela Tedesco, Tamara Kerber Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Raggio, Daniela Procida Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Dentistry and Oral Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28698331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015542 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ladewignathaliamiranda efficacyofconventionaltreatmentwithcompositeresinandatraumaticrestorativetreatmentinposteriorprimaryteethstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sahiaracintiasaori efficacyofconventionaltreatmentwithcompositeresinandatraumaticrestorativetreatmentinposteriorprimaryteethstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT yoshiokalaysa efficacyofconventionaltreatmentwithcompositeresinandatraumaticrestorativetreatmentinposteriorprimaryteethstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT olegarioisabelcristina efficacyofconventionaltreatmentwithcompositeresinandatraumaticrestorativetreatmentinposteriorprimaryteethstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT florianoisabela efficacyofconventionaltreatmentwithcompositeresinandatraumaticrestorativetreatmentinposteriorprimaryteethstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tedescotamarakerber efficacyofconventionaltreatmentwithcompositeresinandatraumaticrestorativetreatmentinposteriorprimaryteethstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mendesfaustomedeiros efficacyofconventionaltreatmentwithcompositeresinandatraumaticrestorativetreatmentinposteriorprimaryteethstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bragamarianaminatel efficacyofconventionaltreatmentwithcompositeresinandatraumaticrestorativetreatmentinposteriorprimaryteethstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT raggiodanielaprocida efficacyofconventionaltreatmentwithcompositeresinandatraumaticrestorativetreatmentinposteriorprimaryteethstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |