Cargando…

Does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Dexterity is described as coordinated hand and finger movement for precision tasks. It is essential for day-to-day activities like computer use, writing or buttoning a shirt. Integrity of brain motor networks is crucial to properly execute these fine hand tasks. When these networks are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Brien, Anthony Terrence, Torrealba Acosta, Gabriel, Huerta, Rodrigo, Thibaut, Aurore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015669
_version_ 1783287049421324288
author O’Brien, Anthony Terrence
Torrealba Acosta, Gabriel
Huerta, Rodrigo
Thibaut, Aurore
author_facet O’Brien, Anthony Terrence
Torrealba Acosta, Gabriel
Huerta, Rodrigo
Thibaut, Aurore
author_sort O’Brien, Anthony Terrence
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dexterity is described as coordinated hand and finger movement for precision tasks. It is essential for day-to-day activities like computer use, writing or buttoning a shirt. Integrity of brain motor networks is crucial to properly execute these fine hand tasks. When these networks are damaged, interventions to enhance recovery are frequently accompanied by unwanted side effects or limited in their effect. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are postulated to target affected motor areas and improve hand motor function with few side effects. However, the results across studies vary, and the current literature does not allow us to draw clear conclusions on the use of NIBS to promote hand function recovery. Therefore, we developed a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of different NIBS technologies on dexterity in diverse populations. This study will potentially help future evidence-based research and guidelines that use these NIBS technologies for recovering hand dexterity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol will compare the effects of active versus sham NIBS on precise hand activity. Records will be obtained by searching relevant databases. Included articles will be randomised clinical trials in adults, testing the therapeutic effects of NIBS on continuous dexterity data. Records will be studied for risk of bias. Narrative and quantitative synthesis will be done. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No private health information is included; the study is not interventional. Ethical approval is not required. The results will be reported in a peer-review journal. REGISTRATION DETAILS: PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews registration number: CRD42016043809.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57344052017-12-20 Does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis O’Brien, Anthony Terrence Torrealba Acosta, Gabriel Huerta, Rodrigo Thibaut, Aurore BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Dexterity is described as coordinated hand and finger movement for precision tasks. It is essential for day-to-day activities like computer use, writing or buttoning a shirt. Integrity of brain motor networks is crucial to properly execute these fine hand tasks. When these networks are damaged, interventions to enhance recovery are frequently accompanied by unwanted side effects or limited in their effect. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are postulated to target affected motor areas and improve hand motor function with few side effects. However, the results across studies vary, and the current literature does not allow us to draw clear conclusions on the use of NIBS to promote hand function recovery. Therefore, we developed a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of different NIBS technologies on dexterity in diverse populations. This study will potentially help future evidence-based research and guidelines that use these NIBS technologies for recovering hand dexterity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol will compare the effects of active versus sham NIBS on precise hand activity. Records will be obtained by searching relevant databases. Included articles will be randomised clinical trials in adults, testing the therapeutic effects of NIBS on continuous dexterity data. Records will be studied for risk of bias. Narrative and quantitative synthesis will be done. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No private health information is included; the study is not interventional. Ethical approval is not required. The results will be reported in a peer-review journal. REGISTRATION DETAILS: PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews registration number: CRD42016043809. BMJ Open 2017-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5734405/ /pubmed/28645972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015669 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
O’Brien, Anthony Terrence
Torrealba Acosta, Gabriel
Huerta, Rodrigo
Thibaut, Aurore
Does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort does non-invasive brain stimulation modify hand dexterity? protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015669
work_keys_str_mv AT obrienanthonyterrence doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodifyhanddexterityprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT torrealbaacostagabriel doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodifyhanddexterityprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huertarodrigo doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodifyhanddexterityprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thibautaurore doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodifyhanddexterityprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis