Cargando…

Being normal, not vulnerable: case study of a 2-day residential programme for young adults with cancer

OBJECTIVES: To identify and describe the outcomes and facilitating processes of participation at ‘Find Your Sense of Tumour’ (FYSOT), a 2-day residential programme/conference for young people with cancer, from the perspective of professionals attending and patient representatives. DESIGN: Case study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, Ana, Taylor, Rachel M, Morgan, Sue, Fern, Lorna A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28710210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015309
_version_ 1783287050150084608
author Martins, Ana
Taylor, Rachel M
Morgan, Sue
Fern, Lorna A
author_facet Martins, Ana
Taylor, Rachel M
Morgan, Sue
Fern, Lorna A
author_sort Martins, Ana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify and describe the outcomes and facilitating processes of participation at ‘Find Your Sense of Tumour’ (FYSOT), a 2-day residential programme/conference for young people with cancer, from the perspective of professionals attending and patient representatives. DESIGN: Case study. SETTING: Observation of the ‘Find Your Sense of Tumour’ over 18s residential programme and face-to-face interviews in hospital and phone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six participants — 19 professionals from hospitals across the UK who accompanied young people to FYSOT; 3 programme organisers; and 4 young people from the programme steering committee. METHODS: Participant observation and semistructured interviews. RESULTS: This process evaluation of an educational, social and peer-to-peer support residential weekend for young people with cancer identified key outcomes for young people — positive attitudes (increased sociability, confidence), belonging (feeling accepted, understood), recreation (trying new activities, having fun) and increased knowledge (balance between educational talks and interactions with other young people); and three overarching facilitating processes — being with other young people, the professionals accompanying young people to the event for support and guidance, and the conference/intentional programming. Being in a safe, relaxed and fun environment with other young people facilitates the development of peer support networks and increases young people’s confidence and knowledge. Although the focus of the residential programme is on young people, interviewees acknowledge the impact of attending on professionals’ motivation, learning and changes in practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study has extended our understanding of the role of residential programmes by identifying outcomes and facilitating mechanisms. We have shown that residential programmes have an important role in providing participants with social, emotional and informational support, as well as play an important role in redefining normality. Longitudinal quantitative and qualitative research is needed to optimise outcomes and design and implement quality programmes that support young people’s development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57344082017-12-20 Being normal, not vulnerable: case study of a 2-day residential programme for young adults with cancer Martins, Ana Taylor, Rachel M Morgan, Sue Fern, Lorna A BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: To identify and describe the outcomes and facilitating processes of participation at ‘Find Your Sense of Tumour’ (FYSOT), a 2-day residential programme/conference for young people with cancer, from the perspective of professionals attending and patient representatives. DESIGN: Case study. SETTING: Observation of the ‘Find Your Sense of Tumour’ over 18s residential programme and face-to-face interviews in hospital and phone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six participants — 19 professionals from hospitals across the UK who accompanied young people to FYSOT; 3 programme organisers; and 4 young people from the programme steering committee. METHODS: Participant observation and semistructured interviews. RESULTS: This process evaluation of an educational, social and peer-to-peer support residential weekend for young people with cancer identified key outcomes for young people — positive attitudes (increased sociability, confidence), belonging (feeling accepted, understood), recreation (trying new activities, having fun) and increased knowledge (balance between educational talks and interactions with other young people); and three overarching facilitating processes — being with other young people, the professionals accompanying young people to the event for support and guidance, and the conference/intentional programming. Being in a safe, relaxed and fun environment with other young people facilitates the development of peer support networks and increases young people’s confidence and knowledge. Although the focus of the residential programme is on young people, interviewees acknowledge the impact of attending on professionals’ motivation, learning and changes in practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study has extended our understanding of the role of residential programmes by identifying outcomes and facilitating mechanisms. We have shown that residential programmes have an important role in providing participants with social, emotional and informational support, as well as play an important role in redefining normality. Longitudinal quantitative and qualitative research is needed to optimise outcomes and design and implement quality programmes that support young people’s development. BMJ Open 2017-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5734408/ /pubmed/28710210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015309 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Martins, Ana
Taylor, Rachel M
Morgan, Sue
Fern, Lorna A
Being normal, not vulnerable: case study of a 2-day residential programme for young adults with cancer
title Being normal, not vulnerable: case study of a 2-day residential programme for young adults with cancer
title_full Being normal, not vulnerable: case study of a 2-day residential programme for young adults with cancer
title_fullStr Being normal, not vulnerable: case study of a 2-day residential programme for young adults with cancer
title_full_unstemmed Being normal, not vulnerable: case study of a 2-day residential programme for young adults with cancer
title_short Being normal, not vulnerable: case study of a 2-day residential programme for young adults with cancer
title_sort being normal, not vulnerable: case study of a 2-day residential programme for young adults with cancer
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28710210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015309
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsana beingnormalnotvulnerablecasestudyofa2dayresidentialprogrammeforyoungadultswithcancer
AT taylorrachelm beingnormalnotvulnerablecasestudyofa2dayresidentialprogrammeforyoungadultswithcancer
AT morgansue beingnormalnotvulnerablecasestudyofa2dayresidentialprogrammeforyoungadultswithcancer
AT fernlornaa beingnormalnotvulnerablecasestudyofa2dayresidentialprogrammeforyoungadultswithcancer