Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of a randomised trial of physical activity in Alzheimer’s disease: a secondary analysis exploring patient and proxy-reported health-related quality of life measures in Denmark

OBJECTIVES: To explore the cost-effectiveness of a supervised moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercise programme in people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) using participant-reported and proxy-reported measures of health-related qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sopina, Elizaveta, Sørensen, Jan, Beyer, Nina, Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers, Waldemar, Gunhild
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28615271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015217
_version_ 1783287051381112832
author Sopina, Elizaveta
Sørensen, Jan
Beyer, Nina
Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers
Waldemar, Gunhild
author_facet Sopina, Elizaveta
Sørensen, Jan
Beyer, Nina
Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers
Waldemar, Gunhild
author_sort Sopina, Elizaveta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore the cost-effectiveness of a supervised moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercise programme in people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) using participant-reported and proxy-reported measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis of economic and HRQoL data from a randomised trial delivered over 16 weeks. SETTING: Memory clinics in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 200 individuals with mild AD aged 50–90 years gave informed consent to participate in the study. Participants were randomised to control or intervention group. INTERVENTIONS: Control group received treatment as usual. The intervention group performed 1 hour of supervised moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercise three times weekly for 16 weeks. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Different physical, functional and health measures were obtained at inclusion (baseline) and 4 and 16 weeks after. HRQoL (EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels/EQ-Visual Analogue Scale) was reported by the participants and the primary caregivers as proxy respondents. Differences in HRQOL as reported by the participant and caregiver were explored as were different values of caregiver time with respite from care tasks. RESULTS: The intervention cost was estimated at €608 and €496 per participant, with and without transport cost, respectively. Participants and caregivers in the intervention group reported a small, positive non-significant improvement in EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS after 16 weeks. The ICER was estimated at €72 000/quality-adjusted life year using participant-reported outcomes and €87000 using caregiver-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the exercise intervention is unlikely to be cost-effective within the commonly applied threshold values. The cost of the intervention might be offset by potential savings from reduction in use of health and social care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01681602.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57344132017-12-20 Cost-effectiveness of a randomised trial of physical activity in Alzheimer’s disease: a secondary analysis exploring patient and proxy-reported health-related quality of life measures in Denmark Sopina, Elizaveta Sørensen, Jan Beyer, Nina Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers Waldemar, Gunhild BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: To explore the cost-effectiveness of a supervised moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercise programme in people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) using participant-reported and proxy-reported measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis of economic and HRQoL data from a randomised trial delivered over 16 weeks. SETTING: Memory clinics in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 200 individuals with mild AD aged 50–90 years gave informed consent to participate in the study. Participants were randomised to control or intervention group. INTERVENTIONS: Control group received treatment as usual. The intervention group performed 1 hour of supervised moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercise three times weekly for 16 weeks. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Different physical, functional and health measures were obtained at inclusion (baseline) and 4 and 16 weeks after. HRQoL (EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels/EQ-Visual Analogue Scale) was reported by the participants and the primary caregivers as proxy respondents. Differences in HRQOL as reported by the participant and caregiver were explored as were different values of caregiver time with respite from care tasks. RESULTS: The intervention cost was estimated at €608 and €496 per participant, with and without transport cost, respectively. Participants and caregivers in the intervention group reported a small, positive non-significant improvement in EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS after 16 weeks. The ICER was estimated at €72 000/quality-adjusted life year using participant-reported outcomes and €87000 using caregiver-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the exercise intervention is unlikely to be cost-effective within the commonly applied threshold values. The cost of the intervention might be offset by potential savings from reduction in use of health and social care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01681602. BMJ Open 2017-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5734413/ /pubmed/28615271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015217 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Economics
Sopina, Elizaveta
Sørensen, Jan
Beyer, Nina
Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers
Waldemar, Gunhild
Cost-effectiveness of a randomised trial of physical activity in Alzheimer’s disease: a secondary analysis exploring patient and proxy-reported health-related quality of life measures in Denmark
title Cost-effectiveness of a randomised trial of physical activity in Alzheimer’s disease: a secondary analysis exploring patient and proxy-reported health-related quality of life measures in Denmark
title_full Cost-effectiveness of a randomised trial of physical activity in Alzheimer’s disease: a secondary analysis exploring patient and proxy-reported health-related quality of life measures in Denmark
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of a randomised trial of physical activity in Alzheimer’s disease: a secondary analysis exploring patient and proxy-reported health-related quality of life measures in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of a randomised trial of physical activity in Alzheimer’s disease: a secondary analysis exploring patient and proxy-reported health-related quality of life measures in Denmark
title_short Cost-effectiveness of a randomised trial of physical activity in Alzheimer’s disease: a secondary analysis exploring patient and proxy-reported health-related quality of life measures in Denmark
title_sort cost-effectiveness of a randomised trial of physical activity in alzheimer’s disease: a secondary analysis exploring patient and proxy-reported health-related quality of life measures in denmark
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28615271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015217
work_keys_str_mv AT sopinaelizaveta costeffectivenessofarandomisedtrialofphysicalactivityinalzheimersdiseaseasecondaryanalysisexploringpatientandproxyreportedhealthrelatedqualityoflifemeasuresindenmark
AT sørensenjan costeffectivenessofarandomisedtrialofphysicalactivityinalzheimersdiseaseasecondaryanalysisexploringpatientandproxyreportedhealthrelatedqualityoflifemeasuresindenmark
AT beyernina costeffectivenessofarandomisedtrialofphysicalactivityinalzheimersdiseaseasecondaryanalysisexploringpatientandproxyreportedhealthrelatedqualityoflifemeasuresindenmark
AT hasselbalchsteengregers costeffectivenessofarandomisedtrialofphysicalactivityinalzheimersdiseaseasecondaryanalysisexploringpatientandproxyreportedhealthrelatedqualityoflifemeasuresindenmark
AT waldemargunhild costeffectivenessofarandomisedtrialofphysicalactivityinalzheimersdiseaseasecondaryanalysisexploringpatientandproxyreportedhealthrelatedqualityoflifemeasuresindenmark