Cargando…

Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults: a systematic review protocol (METACOG)

INTRODUCTION: Whereas the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy has been demonstrated for a variety of mental disorders, there is still need for improvement, especially regarding less prevalent or more severe disorders. Recently, metacognitive interventions have been developed and are now availa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kühne, Franziska, Meister, Ramona, Jansen, Alessa, Härter, Martin, Moritz, Steffen, Kriston, Levente
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015428
_version_ 1783287052101484544
author Kühne, Franziska
Meister, Ramona
Jansen, Alessa
Härter, Martin
Moritz, Steffen
Kriston, Levente
author_facet Kühne, Franziska
Meister, Ramona
Jansen, Alessa
Härter, Martin
Moritz, Steffen
Kriston, Levente
author_sort Kühne, Franziska
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Whereas the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy has been demonstrated for a variety of mental disorders, there is still need for improvement, especially regarding less prevalent or more severe disorders. Recently, metacognitive interventions have been developed and are now available for a variety of diagnoses. Still, a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of different metacognitive interventions for various mental disorders is missing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cross-over and cluster RCTs and non-randomised controlled trials on metacognitive interventions (ie, metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, others) in adults with any mental disorder will be included. As comparators, another psychological or pharmacological treatment, a combined psychological and pharmacological treatment, treatment as usual or no active treatment are eligible. Outcomes refer to efficacy and acceptability of metacognitive interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: In light of the popularity of metacognitive interventions, the systematic review will provide researchers, clinicians and patients with substantial information on the intervention’s effectiveness across different mental disorders. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through a patient workshop.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57344162017-12-20 Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults: a systematic review protocol (METACOG) Kühne, Franziska Meister, Ramona Jansen, Alessa Härter, Martin Moritz, Steffen Kriston, Levente BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Whereas the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy has been demonstrated for a variety of mental disorders, there is still need for improvement, especially regarding less prevalent or more severe disorders. Recently, metacognitive interventions have been developed and are now available for a variety of diagnoses. Still, a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of different metacognitive interventions for various mental disorders is missing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cross-over and cluster RCTs and non-randomised controlled trials on metacognitive interventions (ie, metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, others) in adults with any mental disorder will be included. As comparators, another psychological or pharmacological treatment, a combined psychological and pharmacological treatment, treatment as usual or no active treatment are eligible. Outcomes refer to efficacy and acceptability of metacognitive interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: In light of the popularity of metacognitive interventions, the systematic review will provide researchers, clinicians and patients with substantial information on the intervention’s effectiveness across different mental disorders. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through a patient workshop. BMJ Open 2017-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5734416/ /pubmed/28645966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015428 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Kühne, Franziska
Meister, Ramona
Jansen, Alessa
Härter, Martin
Moritz, Steffen
Kriston, Levente
Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults: a systematic review protocol (METACOG)
title Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults: a systematic review protocol (METACOG)
title_full Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults: a systematic review protocol (METACOG)
title_fullStr Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults: a systematic review protocol (METACOG)
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults: a systematic review protocol (METACOG)
title_short Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults: a systematic review protocol (METACOG)
title_sort effectiveness of metacognitive interventions for mental disorders in adults: a systematic review protocol (metacog)
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015428
work_keys_str_mv AT kuhnefranziska effectivenessofmetacognitiveinterventionsformentaldisordersinadultsasystematicreviewprotocolmetacog
AT meisterramona effectivenessofmetacognitiveinterventionsformentaldisordersinadultsasystematicreviewprotocolmetacog
AT jansenalessa effectivenessofmetacognitiveinterventionsformentaldisordersinadultsasystematicreviewprotocolmetacog
AT hartermartin effectivenessofmetacognitiveinterventionsformentaldisordersinadultsasystematicreviewprotocolmetacog
AT moritzsteffen effectivenessofmetacognitiveinterventionsformentaldisordersinadultsasystematicreviewprotocolmetacog
AT kristonlevente effectivenessofmetacognitiveinterventionsformentaldisordersinadultsasystematicreviewprotocolmetacog