Cargando…

Effectiveness of recruitment to a smartphone-delivered nutrition intervention in New Zealand: analysis of a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: Delivery of interventions via smartphone is a relatively new initiative in public health, and limited evidence exists regarding optimal strategies for recruitment. We describe the effectiveness of approaches used to recruit participants to a smartphone-enabled nutrition intervention tria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volkova, Ekaterina, Michie, Jo, Corrigan, Callie, Sundborn, Gerhard, Eyles, Helen, Jiang, Yannan, Mhurchu, Cliona Ni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28674144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016198
_version_ 1783287059911278592
author Volkova, Ekaterina
Michie, Jo
Corrigan, Callie
Sundborn, Gerhard
Eyles, Helen
Jiang, Yannan
Mhurchu, Cliona Ni
author_facet Volkova, Ekaterina
Michie, Jo
Corrigan, Callie
Sundborn, Gerhard
Eyles, Helen
Jiang, Yannan
Mhurchu, Cliona Ni
author_sort Volkova, Ekaterina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Delivery of interventions via smartphone is a relatively new initiative in public health, and limited evidence exists regarding optimal strategies for recruitment. We describe the effectiveness of approaches used to recruit participants to a smartphone-enabled nutrition intervention trial. METHODS: Internet and social media advertising, mainstream media advertising and research team networks were used to recruit New Zealand adults to a fully automated smartphone-delivered nutrition labelling trial (no face-to-face visits were required). Recruitment of Māori and Pacific participants was a key focus and ethically relevant recruitment materials and approaches were used where possible. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies was evaluated using Google Analytics, monitoring of study website registrations and randomisations, and self-reported participant data. The cost of the various strategies and associations with participant demographics were assessed. RESULTS: Over a period of 13 months, there were 2448 registrations on the study website, and 1357 eligible individuals were randomised into the study (55%). Facebook campaigns were the most successful recruitment strategy overall (43% of all randomised participants) and for all ethnic groups (Māori 44%, Pacific 44% and other 43%). Significant associations were observed between recruitment strategy and age (p<0.001), household size (p<0.001), ethnicity (p<0.001), gender (p=0.005) and interest in healthy eating (p=0.022). Facebook campaigns resulted in the highest absolute numbers of study registrations and randomisations (966 and 584, respectively). Network strategies and Facebook campaigns cost least per randomised participant (NZ$4 and NZ$5, respectively), whereas radio advertising costs most (NZ$179 per participant). CONCLUSION: Internet and social media advertising were the most effective and least costly approaches to recruiting participants to a smartphone-delivered trial. These approaches also reached diverse ethnic groups. However, more culturally appropriate recruitment strategies are likely to be necessary in studies where large numbers of participants from specific ethnic groups are sought. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614000644662; Post-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57344492017-12-20 Effectiveness of recruitment to a smartphone-delivered nutrition intervention in New Zealand: analysis of a randomised controlled trial Volkova, Ekaterina Michie, Jo Corrigan, Callie Sundborn, Gerhard Eyles, Helen Jiang, Yannan Mhurchu, Cliona Ni BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: Delivery of interventions via smartphone is a relatively new initiative in public health, and limited evidence exists regarding optimal strategies for recruitment. We describe the effectiveness of approaches used to recruit participants to a smartphone-enabled nutrition intervention trial. METHODS: Internet and social media advertising, mainstream media advertising and research team networks were used to recruit New Zealand adults to a fully automated smartphone-delivered nutrition labelling trial (no face-to-face visits were required). Recruitment of Māori and Pacific participants was a key focus and ethically relevant recruitment materials and approaches were used where possible. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies was evaluated using Google Analytics, monitoring of study website registrations and randomisations, and self-reported participant data. The cost of the various strategies and associations with participant demographics were assessed. RESULTS: Over a period of 13 months, there were 2448 registrations on the study website, and 1357 eligible individuals were randomised into the study (55%). Facebook campaigns were the most successful recruitment strategy overall (43% of all randomised participants) and for all ethnic groups (Māori 44%, Pacific 44% and other 43%). Significant associations were observed between recruitment strategy and age (p<0.001), household size (p<0.001), ethnicity (p<0.001), gender (p=0.005) and interest in healthy eating (p=0.022). Facebook campaigns resulted in the highest absolute numbers of study registrations and randomisations (966 and 584, respectively). Network strategies and Facebook campaigns cost least per randomised participant (NZ$4 and NZ$5, respectively), whereas radio advertising costs most (NZ$179 per participant). CONCLUSION: Internet and social media advertising were the most effective and least costly approaches to recruiting participants to a smartphone-delivered trial. These approaches also reached diverse ethnic groups. However, more culturally appropriate recruitment strategies are likely to be necessary in studies where large numbers of participants from specific ethnic groups are sought. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614000644662; Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5734449/ /pubmed/28674144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016198 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Methods
Volkova, Ekaterina
Michie, Jo
Corrigan, Callie
Sundborn, Gerhard
Eyles, Helen
Jiang, Yannan
Mhurchu, Cliona Ni
Effectiveness of recruitment to a smartphone-delivered nutrition intervention in New Zealand: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness of recruitment to a smartphone-delivered nutrition intervention in New Zealand: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of recruitment to a smartphone-delivered nutrition intervention in New Zealand: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of recruitment to a smartphone-delivered nutrition intervention in New Zealand: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of recruitment to a smartphone-delivered nutrition intervention in New Zealand: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of recruitment to a smartphone-delivered nutrition intervention in New Zealand: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of recruitment to a smartphone-delivered nutrition intervention in new zealand: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28674144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016198
work_keys_str_mv AT volkovaekaterina effectivenessofrecruitmenttoasmartphonedeliverednutritioninterventioninnewzealandanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT michiejo effectivenessofrecruitmenttoasmartphonedeliverednutritioninterventioninnewzealandanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT corrigancallie effectivenessofrecruitmenttoasmartphonedeliverednutritioninterventioninnewzealandanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sundborngerhard effectivenessofrecruitmenttoasmartphonedeliverednutritioninterventioninnewzealandanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eyleshelen effectivenessofrecruitmenttoasmartphonedeliverednutritioninterventioninnewzealandanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jiangyannan effectivenessofrecruitmenttoasmartphonedeliverednutritioninterventioninnewzealandanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mhurchuclionani effectivenessofrecruitmenttoasmartphonedeliverednutritioninterventioninnewzealandanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial