Cargando…
The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study
OBJECTIVES: This study, developed within the frame of the Partnership for European Research on Occupational Safety and Health joint research activities and based on the frame designed by the 2013 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) study, is the first example of using the points...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336 |
_version_ | 1783287064410718208 |
---|---|
author | Gagliardi, Diana Rondinone, Bruna M Mirabile, Marco Buresti, Giuliana Ellwood, Peter Hery, Michel Paszkiewicz, Peter Valenti, Antonio Iavicoli, Sergio |
author_facet | Gagliardi, Diana Rondinone, Bruna M Mirabile, Marco Buresti, Giuliana Ellwood, Peter Hery, Michel Paszkiewicz, Peter Valenti, Antonio Iavicoli, Sergio |
author_sort | Gagliardi, Diana |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study, developed within the frame of the Partnership for European Research on Occupational Safety and Health joint research activities and based on the frame designed by the 2013 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) study, is the first example of using the points of view of European occupational safety and health (OSH) researchers. The objective is to identify priorities for OSH research that may contribute to the achievement of present and future sustainable growth objectives set by the European strategies. METHODS: The study was carried out using a modified Delphi method with a two-round survey. Each round involved a panel of about 110 researchers representing the network member institutes was selected according to specific criteria, including the ownership of research expertise in at least one of the four macroareas identified by the reference report developed by EU-OSHA in 2013. RESULTS: The study identified some innovative research topics (for example, ‘Emerging technological devices’ and ‘OSH consequences of markets integration’) and research priorities (ie, crowdsourcing, e-work, zero-hours contracts) that are not reflected in previous studies of this nature. The absence of any reference to violence and harassment at work among the researchers’ proposals is a major difference from previous similar studies, while topics related to gender issues and electromagnetic fields show a lower importance. CONCLUSIONS: The innovative design of a research priorities identification process, which takes advantage of a large, representative and qualified panel of European researchers allowed the definition of a number of research priorities able to support the inclusion of innovative OSH research issues in the scope of the next European research agenda. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5734473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57344732017-12-20 The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study Gagliardi, Diana Rondinone, Bruna M Mirabile, Marco Buresti, Giuliana Ellwood, Peter Hery, Michel Paszkiewicz, Peter Valenti, Antonio Iavicoli, Sergio BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: This study, developed within the frame of the Partnership for European Research on Occupational Safety and Health joint research activities and based on the frame designed by the 2013 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) study, is the first example of using the points of view of European occupational safety and health (OSH) researchers. The objective is to identify priorities for OSH research that may contribute to the achievement of present and future sustainable growth objectives set by the European strategies. METHODS: The study was carried out using a modified Delphi method with a two-round survey. Each round involved a panel of about 110 researchers representing the network member institutes was selected according to specific criteria, including the ownership of research expertise in at least one of the four macroareas identified by the reference report developed by EU-OSHA in 2013. RESULTS: The study identified some innovative research topics (for example, ‘Emerging technological devices’ and ‘OSH consequences of markets integration’) and research priorities (ie, crowdsourcing, e-work, zero-hours contracts) that are not reflected in previous studies of this nature. The absence of any reference to violence and harassment at work among the researchers’ proposals is a major difference from previous similar studies, while topics related to gender issues and electromagnetic fields show a lower importance. CONCLUSIONS: The innovative design of a research priorities identification process, which takes advantage of a large, representative and qualified panel of European researchers allowed the definition of a number of research priorities able to support the inclusion of innovative OSH research issues in the scope of the next European research agenda. BMJ Open 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5734473/ /pubmed/28645965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Occupational and Environmental Medicine Gagliardi, Diana Rondinone, Bruna M Mirabile, Marco Buresti, Giuliana Ellwood, Peter Hery, Michel Paszkiewicz, Peter Valenti, Antonio Iavicoli, Sergio The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study |
title | The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study |
title_full | The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study |
title_fullStr | The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed | The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study |
title_short | The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study |
title_sort | perspective of european researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a european research agenda: a modified delphi study |
topic | Occupational and Environmental Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gagliardidiana theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT rondinonebrunam theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT mirabilemarco theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT burestigiuliana theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT ellwoodpeter theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT herymichel theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT paszkiewiczpeter theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT valentiantonio theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT iavicolisergio theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT gagliardidiana perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT rondinonebrunam perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT mirabilemarco perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT burestigiuliana perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT ellwoodpeter perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT herymichel perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT paszkiewiczpeter perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT valentiantonio perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy AT iavicolisergio perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy |