Cargando…

The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study

OBJECTIVES: This study, developed within the frame of the Partnership for European Research on Occupational Safety and Health joint research activities and based on the frame designed by the 2013 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) study, is the first example of using the points...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gagliardi, Diana, Rondinone, Bruna M, Mirabile, Marco, Buresti, Giuliana, Ellwood, Peter, Hery, Michel, Paszkiewicz, Peter, Valenti, Antonio, Iavicoli, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336
_version_ 1783287064410718208
author Gagliardi, Diana
Rondinone, Bruna M
Mirabile, Marco
Buresti, Giuliana
Ellwood, Peter
Hery, Michel
Paszkiewicz, Peter
Valenti, Antonio
Iavicoli, Sergio
author_facet Gagliardi, Diana
Rondinone, Bruna M
Mirabile, Marco
Buresti, Giuliana
Ellwood, Peter
Hery, Michel
Paszkiewicz, Peter
Valenti, Antonio
Iavicoli, Sergio
author_sort Gagliardi, Diana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study, developed within the frame of the Partnership for European Research on Occupational Safety and Health joint research activities and based on the frame designed by the 2013 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) study, is the first example of using the points of view of European occupational safety and health (OSH) researchers. The objective is to identify priorities for OSH research that may contribute to the achievement of present and future sustainable growth objectives set by the European strategies. METHODS: The study was carried out using a modified Delphi method with a two-round survey. Each round involved a panel of about 110 researchers representing the network member institutes was selected according to specific criteria, including the ownership of research expertise in at least one of the four macroareas identified by the reference report developed by EU-OSHA in 2013. RESULTS: The study identified some innovative research topics (for example, ‘Emerging technological devices’ and ‘OSH consequences of markets integration’) and research priorities (ie, crowdsourcing, e-work, zero-hours contracts) that are not reflected in previous studies of this nature. The absence of any reference to violence and harassment at work among the researchers’ proposals is a major difference from previous similar studies, while topics related to gender issues and electromagnetic fields show a lower importance. CONCLUSIONS: The innovative design of a research priorities identification process, which takes advantage of a large, representative and qualified panel of European researchers allowed the definition of a number of research priorities able to support the inclusion of innovative OSH research issues in the scope of the next European research agenda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57344732017-12-20 The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study Gagliardi, Diana Rondinone, Bruna M Mirabile, Marco Buresti, Giuliana Ellwood, Peter Hery, Michel Paszkiewicz, Peter Valenti, Antonio Iavicoli, Sergio BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: This study, developed within the frame of the Partnership for European Research on Occupational Safety and Health joint research activities and based on the frame designed by the 2013 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) study, is the first example of using the points of view of European occupational safety and health (OSH) researchers. The objective is to identify priorities for OSH research that may contribute to the achievement of present and future sustainable growth objectives set by the European strategies. METHODS: The study was carried out using a modified Delphi method with a two-round survey. Each round involved a panel of about 110 researchers representing the network member institutes was selected according to specific criteria, including the ownership of research expertise in at least one of the four macroareas identified by the reference report developed by EU-OSHA in 2013. RESULTS: The study identified some innovative research topics (for example, ‘Emerging technological devices’ and ‘OSH consequences of markets integration’) and research priorities (ie, crowdsourcing, e-work, zero-hours contracts) that are not reflected in previous studies of this nature. The absence of any reference to violence and harassment at work among the researchers’ proposals is a major difference from previous similar studies, while topics related to gender issues and electromagnetic fields show a lower importance. CONCLUSIONS: The innovative design of a research priorities identification process, which takes advantage of a large, representative and qualified panel of European researchers allowed the definition of a number of research priorities able to support the inclusion of innovative OSH research issues in the scope of the next European research agenda. BMJ Open 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5734473/ /pubmed/28645965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Gagliardi, Diana
Rondinone, Bruna M
Mirabile, Marco
Buresti, Giuliana
Ellwood, Peter
Hery, Michel
Paszkiewicz, Peter
Valenti, Antonio
Iavicoli, Sergio
The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study
title The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study
title_full The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study
title_fullStr The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study
title_short The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study
title_sort perspective of european researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a european research agenda: a modified delphi study
topic Occupational and Environmental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336
work_keys_str_mv AT gagliardidiana theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT rondinonebrunam theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT mirabilemarco theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT burestigiuliana theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT ellwoodpeter theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT herymichel theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT paszkiewiczpeter theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT valentiantonio theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT iavicolisergio theperspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT gagliardidiana perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT rondinonebrunam perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT mirabilemarco perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT burestigiuliana perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT ellwoodpeter perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT herymichel perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT paszkiewiczpeter perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT valentiantonio perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy
AT iavicolisergio perspectiveofeuropeanresearchersofnationaloccupationalsafetyandhealthinstitutesforcontributingtoaeuropeanresearchagendaamodifieddelphistudy