Cargando…
What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis
BACKGROUND: Co-production is defined as the voluntary or involuntary involvement of users in the design, management, delivery and/or evaluation of services. Interest in co-production as an intervention for improving healthcare quality is increasing. In the acute healthcare context, co-production is...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014650 |
_version_ | 1783287067057324032 |
---|---|
author | Clarke, David Jones, Fiona Harris, Ruth Robert, Glenn |
author_facet | Clarke, David Jones, Fiona Harris, Ruth Robert, Glenn |
author_sort | Clarke, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Co-production is defined as the voluntary or involuntary involvement of users in the design, management, delivery and/or evaluation of services. Interest in co-production as an intervention for improving healthcare quality is increasing. In the acute healthcare context, co-production is promoted as harnessing the knowledge of patients, carers and staff to make changes about which they care most. However, little is known regarding the impact of co-production on patient, staff or organisational outcomes in these settings. AIMS: To identify and appraise reported outcomes of co-production as an intervention to improve quality of services in acute healthcare settings. DESIGN: Rapid evidence synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Cinahl, Web of Science, Embase, HMIC, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, SCIE, Proquest Dissertation and Theses, EThOS, OpenGrey; CoDesign; The Design Journal; Design Issues. STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting patient, staff or organisational outcomes associated with using co-production in an acute healthcare setting. FINDINGS: 712 titles and abstracts were screened; 24 papers underwent full-text review, and 11 papers were included in the evidence synthesis. One study was a feasibility randomised controlled trial, three were process evaluations and seven used descriptive qualitative approaches. Reported outcomes related to (a) the value of patient and staff involvement in co-production processes; (b) the generation of ideas for changes to processes, practices and clinical environments; and (c) tangible service changes and impacts on patient experiences. Only one study included cost analysis; none reported an economic evaluation. No studies assessed the sustainability of any changes made. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing interest in and advocacy for co-production, there is a lack of rigorous evaluation in acute healthcare settings. Future studies should evaluate clinical and service outcomes as well as the cost-effectiveness of co-production relative to other forms of quality improvement. Potentially broader impacts on the values and behaviours of participants should also be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5734495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57344952017-12-20 What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis Clarke, David Jones, Fiona Harris, Ruth Robert, Glenn BMJ Open Health Services Research BACKGROUND: Co-production is defined as the voluntary or involuntary involvement of users in the design, management, delivery and/or evaluation of services. Interest in co-production as an intervention for improving healthcare quality is increasing. In the acute healthcare context, co-production is promoted as harnessing the knowledge of patients, carers and staff to make changes about which they care most. However, little is known regarding the impact of co-production on patient, staff or organisational outcomes in these settings. AIMS: To identify and appraise reported outcomes of co-production as an intervention to improve quality of services in acute healthcare settings. DESIGN: Rapid evidence synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Cinahl, Web of Science, Embase, HMIC, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, SCIE, Proquest Dissertation and Theses, EThOS, OpenGrey; CoDesign; The Design Journal; Design Issues. STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting patient, staff or organisational outcomes associated with using co-production in an acute healthcare setting. FINDINGS: 712 titles and abstracts were screened; 24 papers underwent full-text review, and 11 papers were included in the evidence synthesis. One study was a feasibility randomised controlled trial, three were process evaluations and seven used descriptive qualitative approaches. Reported outcomes related to (a) the value of patient and staff involvement in co-production processes; (b) the generation of ideas for changes to processes, practices and clinical environments; and (c) tangible service changes and impacts on patient experiences. Only one study included cost analysis; none reported an economic evaluation. No studies assessed the sustainability of any changes made. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing interest in and advocacy for co-production, there is a lack of rigorous evaluation in acute healthcare settings. Future studies should evaluate clinical and service outcomes as well as the cost-effectiveness of co-production relative to other forms of quality improvement. Potentially broader impacts on the values and behaviours of participants should also be considered. BMJ Open 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5734495/ /pubmed/28701409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014650 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Clarke, David Jones, Fiona Harris, Ruth Robert, Glenn What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis |
title | What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis |
title_full | What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis |
title_fullStr | What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis |
title_short | What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis |
title_sort | what outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? a rapid evidence synthesis |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014650 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkedavid whatoutcomesareassociatedwithdevelopingandimplementingcoproducedinterventionsinacutehealthcaresettingsarapidevidencesynthesis AT jonesfiona whatoutcomesareassociatedwithdevelopingandimplementingcoproducedinterventionsinacutehealthcaresettingsarapidevidencesynthesis AT harrisruth whatoutcomesareassociatedwithdevelopingandimplementingcoproducedinterventionsinacutehealthcaresettingsarapidevidencesynthesis AT robertglenn whatoutcomesareassociatedwithdevelopingandimplementingcoproducedinterventionsinacutehealthcaresettingsarapidevidencesynthesis |