Cargando…

Project RED Impacts Patient Experience

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients are frequently unprepared to care for themselves after discharge often leading to unplanned hospital readmission. One strategy to reduce readmission rates is improving the quality of patient education and preparation before hospital discharge. The ReEngineered Disch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cancino, Ramon S, Manasseh, Chris, Kwong, Lana, Mitchell, Suzanne E, Martin, Jessica, Jack, Brian W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29276765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373517714454
_version_ 1783287068825223168
author Cancino, Ramon S
Manasseh, Chris
Kwong, Lana
Mitchell, Suzanne E
Martin, Jessica
Jack, Brian W
author_facet Cancino, Ramon S
Manasseh, Chris
Kwong, Lana
Mitchell, Suzanne E
Martin, Jessica
Jack, Brian W
author_sort Cancino, Ramon S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients are frequently unprepared to care for themselves after discharge often leading to unplanned hospital readmission. One strategy to reduce readmission rates is improving the quality of patient education and preparation before hospital discharge. The ReEngineered Discharge (RED) is a standardized hospital-based program designed to provide patients and caregivers the information they need to continue care at home. OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the impact of the RED intervention on posthospitalization adult patient experience scores in an urban academic safety-net hospital. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of a pilot program that compared posthospitalization survey responses to the Press Ganey survey item “Instructions were given about how to care for yourself at home.” We compared the survey results for 3 groups of adult patients: those receiving the RED program, those receiving a standard discharge on the same hospital unit, and those receiving a standard discharge on other hospital units. RESULTS: A greater percentage of adult patients who received the RED discharge program rated the quality of their discharge as “very good” as compared to those receiving a standard discharge on the same hospital unit and those receiving a standard discharge on other hospital units (61%, 35%, and 41%, respectively, P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Delivery of a standardized hospital discharge program resulted in a larger proportion of top-box “very good” responses on a Press Ganey posthospitalization survey. Future research should examine whether hospital-based transition programs can sustain improvement in patient experience measures and whether these improvements can be observed in other patient populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5734517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57345172017-12-22 Project RED Impacts Patient Experience Cancino, Ramon S Manasseh, Chris Kwong, Lana Mitchell, Suzanne E Martin, Jessica Jack, Brian W J Patient Exp Research Articles BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients are frequently unprepared to care for themselves after discharge often leading to unplanned hospital readmission. One strategy to reduce readmission rates is improving the quality of patient education and preparation before hospital discharge. The ReEngineered Discharge (RED) is a standardized hospital-based program designed to provide patients and caregivers the information they need to continue care at home. OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the impact of the RED intervention on posthospitalization adult patient experience scores in an urban academic safety-net hospital. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of a pilot program that compared posthospitalization survey responses to the Press Ganey survey item “Instructions were given about how to care for yourself at home.” We compared the survey results for 3 groups of adult patients: those receiving the RED program, those receiving a standard discharge on the same hospital unit, and those receiving a standard discharge on other hospital units. RESULTS: A greater percentage of adult patients who received the RED discharge program rated the quality of their discharge as “very good” as compared to those receiving a standard discharge on the same hospital unit and those receiving a standard discharge on other hospital units (61%, 35%, and 41%, respectively, P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Delivery of a standardized hospital discharge program resulted in a larger proportion of top-box “very good” responses on a Press Ganey posthospitalization survey. Future research should examine whether hospital-based transition programs can sustain improvement in patient experience measures and whether these improvements can be observed in other patient populations. SAGE Publications 2017-06-16 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5734517/ /pubmed/29276765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373517714454 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Cancino, Ramon S
Manasseh, Chris
Kwong, Lana
Mitchell, Suzanne E
Martin, Jessica
Jack, Brian W
Project RED Impacts Patient Experience
title Project RED Impacts Patient Experience
title_full Project RED Impacts Patient Experience
title_fullStr Project RED Impacts Patient Experience
title_full_unstemmed Project RED Impacts Patient Experience
title_short Project RED Impacts Patient Experience
title_sort project red impacts patient experience
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29276765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373517714454
work_keys_str_mv AT cancinoramons projectredimpactspatientexperience
AT manassehchris projectredimpactspatientexperience
AT kwonglana projectredimpactspatientexperience
AT mitchellsuzannee projectredimpactspatientexperience
AT martinjessica projectredimpactspatientexperience
AT jackbrianw projectredimpactspatientexperience