Cargando…
Project RED Impacts Patient Experience
BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients are frequently unprepared to care for themselves after discharge often leading to unplanned hospital readmission. One strategy to reduce readmission rates is improving the quality of patient education and preparation before hospital discharge. The ReEngineered Disch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29276765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373517714454 |
_version_ | 1783287068825223168 |
---|---|
author | Cancino, Ramon S Manasseh, Chris Kwong, Lana Mitchell, Suzanne E Martin, Jessica Jack, Brian W |
author_facet | Cancino, Ramon S Manasseh, Chris Kwong, Lana Mitchell, Suzanne E Martin, Jessica Jack, Brian W |
author_sort | Cancino, Ramon S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients are frequently unprepared to care for themselves after discharge often leading to unplanned hospital readmission. One strategy to reduce readmission rates is improving the quality of patient education and preparation before hospital discharge. The ReEngineered Discharge (RED) is a standardized hospital-based program designed to provide patients and caregivers the information they need to continue care at home. OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the impact of the RED intervention on posthospitalization adult patient experience scores in an urban academic safety-net hospital. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of a pilot program that compared posthospitalization survey responses to the Press Ganey survey item “Instructions were given about how to care for yourself at home.” We compared the survey results for 3 groups of adult patients: those receiving the RED program, those receiving a standard discharge on the same hospital unit, and those receiving a standard discharge on other hospital units. RESULTS: A greater percentage of adult patients who received the RED discharge program rated the quality of their discharge as “very good” as compared to those receiving a standard discharge on the same hospital unit and those receiving a standard discharge on other hospital units (61%, 35%, and 41%, respectively, P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Delivery of a standardized hospital discharge program resulted in a larger proportion of top-box “very good” responses on a Press Ganey posthospitalization survey. Future research should examine whether hospital-based transition programs can sustain improvement in patient experience measures and whether these improvements can be observed in other patient populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5734517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57345172017-12-22 Project RED Impacts Patient Experience Cancino, Ramon S Manasseh, Chris Kwong, Lana Mitchell, Suzanne E Martin, Jessica Jack, Brian W J Patient Exp Research Articles BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients are frequently unprepared to care for themselves after discharge often leading to unplanned hospital readmission. One strategy to reduce readmission rates is improving the quality of patient education and preparation before hospital discharge. The ReEngineered Discharge (RED) is a standardized hospital-based program designed to provide patients and caregivers the information they need to continue care at home. OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the impact of the RED intervention on posthospitalization adult patient experience scores in an urban academic safety-net hospital. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of a pilot program that compared posthospitalization survey responses to the Press Ganey survey item “Instructions were given about how to care for yourself at home.” We compared the survey results for 3 groups of adult patients: those receiving the RED program, those receiving a standard discharge on the same hospital unit, and those receiving a standard discharge on other hospital units. RESULTS: A greater percentage of adult patients who received the RED discharge program rated the quality of their discharge as “very good” as compared to those receiving a standard discharge on the same hospital unit and those receiving a standard discharge on other hospital units (61%, 35%, and 41%, respectively, P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Delivery of a standardized hospital discharge program resulted in a larger proportion of top-box “very good” responses on a Press Ganey posthospitalization survey. Future research should examine whether hospital-based transition programs can sustain improvement in patient experience measures and whether these improvements can be observed in other patient populations. SAGE Publications 2017-06-16 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5734517/ /pubmed/29276765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373517714454 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Cancino, Ramon S Manasseh, Chris Kwong, Lana Mitchell, Suzanne E Martin, Jessica Jack, Brian W Project RED Impacts Patient Experience |
title | Project RED Impacts Patient Experience |
title_full | Project RED Impacts Patient Experience |
title_fullStr | Project RED Impacts Patient Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Project RED Impacts Patient Experience |
title_short | Project RED Impacts Patient Experience |
title_sort | project red impacts patient experience |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29276765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373517714454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cancinoramons projectredimpactspatientexperience AT manassehchris projectredimpactspatientexperience AT kwonglana projectredimpactspatientexperience AT mitchellsuzannee projectredimpactspatientexperience AT martinjessica projectredimpactspatientexperience AT jackbrianw projectredimpactspatientexperience |