Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Potential Risk Factors for at-Risk Gambling, Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder among Current Gamblers—Results of the Austrian Representative Survey 2015

Background: The risk of developing a problem gambling behavior is distributed unequally among the population. For example, individuals who report stressful life events, show impairments of mental health or belong to a socio-economically deprived group are affected more frequently by gambling problem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buth, Sven, Wurst, Friedrich M., Thon, Natasha, Lahusen, Harald, Kalke, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29312056
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02188
_version_ 1783287129098420224
author Buth, Sven
Wurst, Friedrich M.
Thon, Natasha
Lahusen, Harald
Kalke, Jens
author_facet Buth, Sven
Wurst, Friedrich M.
Thon, Natasha
Lahusen, Harald
Kalke, Jens
author_sort Buth, Sven
collection PubMed
description Background: The risk of developing a problem gambling behavior is distributed unequally among the population. For example, individuals who report stressful life events, show impairments of mental health or belong to a socio-economically deprived group are affected more frequently by gambling problems. The aim of our study is to investigate whether these risk factors are equally relevant for all gambling groups (social = 0 DSM-5 criteria, at risk = 1 DSM-5 criterion, problem = 2–3 DSM-5 criteria, disordered = 4–9 DSM-5 criteria). Methods: Of a total of 10,000 participants in the representative gambling survey in Austria in 2015, 4,082 individuals reported gambling during the last 12 months and were allocated to the four gambling groups according to DSM-5. With social gamblers as the reference group, relevant risk factors for the other three groups were identified by means of bi- and multivariate multinomial logistic regression. Results: Significant risk factors for gambling disorder are at-risk alcohol use (OR = 4.9), poor mental health (OR = 5.9), young age (≤26 years, OR = 2.1), a low level of formal education (OR = 2.4), having grown up with a single parent (OR = 2.5), parents with addiction problems (OR = 2.3) and belonging to the working class (OR = 2.9). Risk factors for problem gambling are parents with addiction problems (OR = 3.8), poor mental health (OR = 2.6) and a young age (OR = 2.2). With regard to at-risk gambling, only growing up with a single parent was relevant (OR = 2.4). Conclusion: Overall, the results of this study suggest, that the number and the influence of the included risk factors differ between gambling problem groups. Apparently, the development of severe gambling problems is to a lesser extent facilitated by specific risk factors than by their cumulative presence. Therefore, future prevention and treatment measures should place a particular focus on individuals who have experienced growing up in a difficult family situation, have poor mental health, suffer from substance-related problems or have a low level of formal education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5735080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57350802018-01-08 Comparative Analysis of Potential Risk Factors for at-Risk Gambling, Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder among Current Gamblers—Results of the Austrian Representative Survey 2015 Buth, Sven Wurst, Friedrich M. Thon, Natasha Lahusen, Harald Kalke, Jens Front Psychol Psychology Background: The risk of developing a problem gambling behavior is distributed unequally among the population. For example, individuals who report stressful life events, show impairments of mental health or belong to a socio-economically deprived group are affected more frequently by gambling problems. The aim of our study is to investigate whether these risk factors are equally relevant for all gambling groups (social = 0 DSM-5 criteria, at risk = 1 DSM-5 criterion, problem = 2–3 DSM-5 criteria, disordered = 4–9 DSM-5 criteria). Methods: Of a total of 10,000 participants in the representative gambling survey in Austria in 2015, 4,082 individuals reported gambling during the last 12 months and were allocated to the four gambling groups according to DSM-5. With social gamblers as the reference group, relevant risk factors for the other three groups were identified by means of bi- and multivariate multinomial logistic regression. Results: Significant risk factors for gambling disorder are at-risk alcohol use (OR = 4.9), poor mental health (OR = 5.9), young age (≤26 years, OR = 2.1), a low level of formal education (OR = 2.4), having grown up with a single parent (OR = 2.5), parents with addiction problems (OR = 2.3) and belonging to the working class (OR = 2.9). Risk factors for problem gambling are parents with addiction problems (OR = 3.8), poor mental health (OR = 2.6) and a young age (OR = 2.2). With regard to at-risk gambling, only growing up with a single parent was relevant (OR = 2.4). Conclusion: Overall, the results of this study suggest, that the number and the influence of the included risk factors differ between gambling problem groups. Apparently, the development of severe gambling problems is to a lesser extent facilitated by specific risk factors than by their cumulative presence. Therefore, future prevention and treatment measures should place a particular focus on individuals who have experienced growing up in a difficult family situation, have poor mental health, suffer from substance-related problems or have a low level of formal education. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5735080/ /pubmed/29312056 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02188 Text en Copyright © 2017 Buth, Wurst, Thon, Lahusen and Kalke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Buth, Sven
Wurst, Friedrich M.
Thon, Natasha
Lahusen, Harald
Kalke, Jens
Comparative Analysis of Potential Risk Factors for at-Risk Gambling, Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder among Current Gamblers—Results of the Austrian Representative Survey 2015
title Comparative Analysis of Potential Risk Factors for at-Risk Gambling, Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder among Current Gamblers—Results of the Austrian Representative Survey 2015
title_full Comparative Analysis of Potential Risk Factors for at-Risk Gambling, Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder among Current Gamblers—Results of the Austrian Representative Survey 2015
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Potential Risk Factors for at-Risk Gambling, Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder among Current Gamblers—Results of the Austrian Representative Survey 2015
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Potential Risk Factors for at-Risk Gambling, Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder among Current Gamblers—Results of the Austrian Representative Survey 2015
title_short Comparative Analysis of Potential Risk Factors for at-Risk Gambling, Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder among Current Gamblers—Results of the Austrian Representative Survey 2015
title_sort comparative analysis of potential risk factors for at-risk gambling, problem gambling and gambling disorder among current gamblers—results of the austrian representative survey 2015
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29312056
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02188
work_keys_str_mv AT buthsven comparativeanalysisofpotentialriskfactorsforatriskgamblingproblemgamblingandgamblingdisorderamongcurrentgamblersresultsoftheaustrianrepresentativesurvey2015
AT wurstfriedrichm comparativeanalysisofpotentialriskfactorsforatriskgamblingproblemgamblingandgamblingdisorderamongcurrentgamblersresultsoftheaustrianrepresentativesurvey2015
AT thonnatasha comparativeanalysisofpotentialriskfactorsforatriskgamblingproblemgamblingandgamblingdisorderamongcurrentgamblersresultsoftheaustrianrepresentativesurvey2015
AT lahusenharald comparativeanalysisofpotentialriskfactorsforatriskgamblingproblemgamblingandgamblingdisorderamongcurrentgamblersresultsoftheaustrianrepresentativesurvey2015
AT kalkejens comparativeanalysisofpotentialriskfactorsforatriskgamblingproblemgamblingandgamblingdisorderamongcurrentgamblersresultsoftheaustrianrepresentativesurvey2015