Cargando…

Is Endoscopy Really Necessary for Placing Intragastric Balloons?

BACKGROUND: Gastric balloons for weight loss have historically been placed after a screening endoscopy. However, the utility and yield of these endoscopies has not been studied. Therefore, we wanted to evaluate the utility of screening endoscopy and to assess patients who had balloons placed without...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mathus-Vliegen, Elisabeth M.H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28695461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2812-5
_version_ 1783287161868517376
author Mathus-Vliegen, Elisabeth M.H.
author_facet Mathus-Vliegen, Elisabeth M.H.
author_sort Mathus-Vliegen, Elisabeth M.H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastric balloons for weight loss have historically been placed after a screening endoscopy. However, the utility and yield of these endoscopies has not been studied. Therefore, we wanted to evaluate the utility of screening endoscopy and to assess patients who had balloons placed without endoscopy. METHODS: Data was collected on two cohorts. Cohort 1 consisted of patients who had a screening endoscopy prior to or upon balloon placement. Cohort 2 consisted of patients who were followed after having a balloon placed under fluoroscopic guidance without endoscopy. Balloon intolerance and findings on removal endoscopy were assessed in both cohorts. RESULTS: In cohort 1 (n = 253), two patients had severe symptoms on history; balloon placement was contraindicated based on screening endoscopy findings. Eleven patients with a history of hiatal hernia and the presence of severe belching demonstrated an insignificant hiatal hernia on endoscopy. In cohort 2 (n = 50), all patients had an unremarkable history. Three previously asymptomatic patients had balloon intolerance and one was found to have a 4-cm hiatal hernia and oesophagitis upon balloon removal. Out of 194 patients, 25 were either intolerant to the balloon or had relevant findings on removal endoscopy. Findings on screening endoscopy did not correlate with balloon intolerance or findings on removal endoscopy. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that a careful history can identify patients who may have contraindications for balloon therapy and that balloons can be placed safely after taking a careful history without screening endoscopy. Screening endoscopy may not be useful in predicting balloon intolerance or potential complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5735215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57352152017-12-26 Is Endoscopy Really Necessary for Placing Intragastric Balloons? Mathus-Vliegen, Elisabeth M.H. Obes Surg Original Contributions BACKGROUND: Gastric balloons for weight loss have historically been placed after a screening endoscopy. However, the utility and yield of these endoscopies has not been studied. Therefore, we wanted to evaluate the utility of screening endoscopy and to assess patients who had balloons placed without endoscopy. METHODS: Data was collected on two cohorts. Cohort 1 consisted of patients who had a screening endoscopy prior to or upon balloon placement. Cohort 2 consisted of patients who were followed after having a balloon placed under fluoroscopic guidance without endoscopy. Balloon intolerance and findings on removal endoscopy were assessed in both cohorts. RESULTS: In cohort 1 (n = 253), two patients had severe symptoms on history; balloon placement was contraindicated based on screening endoscopy findings. Eleven patients with a history of hiatal hernia and the presence of severe belching demonstrated an insignificant hiatal hernia on endoscopy. In cohort 2 (n = 50), all patients had an unremarkable history. Three previously asymptomatic patients had balloon intolerance and one was found to have a 4-cm hiatal hernia and oesophagitis upon balloon removal. Out of 194 patients, 25 were either intolerant to the balloon or had relevant findings on removal endoscopy. Findings on screening endoscopy did not correlate with balloon intolerance or findings on removal endoscopy. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that a careful history can identify patients who may have contraindications for balloon therapy and that balloons can be placed safely after taking a careful history without screening endoscopy. Screening endoscopy may not be useful in predicting balloon intolerance or potential complications. Springer US 2017-07-10 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5735215/ /pubmed/28695461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2812-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Mathus-Vliegen, Elisabeth M.H.
Is Endoscopy Really Necessary for Placing Intragastric Balloons?
title Is Endoscopy Really Necessary for Placing Intragastric Balloons?
title_full Is Endoscopy Really Necessary for Placing Intragastric Balloons?
title_fullStr Is Endoscopy Really Necessary for Placing Intragastric Balloons?
title_full_unstemmed Is Endoscopy Really Necessary for Placing Intragastric Balloons?
title_short Is Endoscopy Really Necessary for Placing Intragastric Balloons?
title_sort is endoscopy really necessary for placing intragastric balloons?
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28695461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2812-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mathusvliegenelisabethmh isendoscopyreallynecessaryforplacingintragastricballoons