Cargando…

Dexmedetomidine versus Magnesium Sulfate in Anesthesia for Cochlear Implantation Surgery in Pediatric Patients

CONTEXT: Cochlear implantation surgery represents a great advance in ENT surgeries. Special anesthetic managements were required to provide bloodless surgical field and monitoring of the facial nerve. AIMS: We aimed to compare both dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate as regards their efficacy in i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan, Passaint Fahim, Saleh, Amany Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284876
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_72_17
_version_ 1783287206165610496
author Hassan, Passaint Fahim
Saleh, Amany Hassan
author_facet Hassan, Passaint Fahim
Saleh, Amany Hassan
author_sort Hassan, Passaint Fahim
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Cochlear implantation surgery represents a great advance in ENT surgeries. Special anesthetic managements were required to provide bloodless surgical field and monitoring of the facial nerve. AIMS: We aimed to compare both dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate as regards their efficacy in inducing deliberate hypotension and providing better quality of the surgical field during cochlear implantation in pediatrics. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, randomized double-blinded study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-six pediatric patients aging 1.5–2.5 years of either sex with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I and II were randomized into dexmedetomidine (D) group (n = 23) and magnesium sulfate (M) group (n = 23). In the D group, after induction of anesthesia but before the surgery, a bolus dose of 0.4 μg/kg slowly infused over 10 min, then continuous infusion by a rate of 0.4 μg/kg/h until the end of surgery. In M group, after induction of anesthesia but before the surgery, magnesium sulfate 10% (50 mg/kg) was given slowly, then continuous infusion by a rate of 10 mg/kg/h during the whole surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamics, quality of surgical field, fentanyl consumption, blood loss, operative time, FLACC pain scores, and adverse effects were compared in both groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation, ranges, numbers, and percentages as appropriate. Comparison of demographic data and time of surgery was done by Student's t-test. Two-way analysis of variance with correction for repeated measurements was used for heart rate and blood pressure comparison. Mann–Whitney U-test was used for nonparametric measurements. RESULTS: Surgical field score and blood loss were better in D group than M group. Fentanyl consumption was less in D group than M group. Heart rate and mean atrial blood pressure were lower in D group except in the initial times than M group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, both drugs were effective in achieving hypotensive anesthesia in pediatrics; however, dexmedetomidine proved to have superior effect on the surgical field and blood loss compared to magnesium sulfate with no intra- and post-operative complications for cochlear implantation surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5735451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57354512017-12-28 Dexmedetomidine versus Magnesium Sulfate in Anesthesia for Cochlear Implantation Surgery in Pediatric Patients Hassan, Passaint Fahim Saleh, Amany Hassan Anesth Essays Res Original Article CONTEXT: Cochlear implantation surgery represents a great advance in ENT surgeries. Special anesthetic managements were required to provide bloodless surgical field and monitoring of the facial nerve. AIMS: We aimed to compare both dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate as regards their efficacy in inducing deliberate hypotension and providing better quality of the surgical field during cochlear implantation in pediatrics. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, randomized double-blinded study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-six pediatric patients aging 1.5–2.5 years of either sex with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I and II were randomized into dexmedetomidine (D) group (n = 23) and magnesium sulfate (M) group (n = 23). In the D group, after induction of anesthesia but before the surgery, a bolus dose of 0.4 μg/kg slowly infused over 10 min, then continuous infusion by a rate of 0.4 μg/kg/h until the end of surgery. In M group, after induction of anesthesia but before the surgery, magnesium sulfate 10% (50 mg/kg) was given slowly, then continuous infusion by a rate of 10 mg/kg/h during the whole surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamics, quality of surgical field, fentanyl consumption, blood loss, operative time, FLACC pain scores, and adverse effects were compared in both groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation, ranges, numbers, and percentages as appropriate. Comparison of demographic data and time of surgery was done by Student's t-test. Two-way analysis of variance with correction for repeated measurements was used for heart rate and blood pressure comparison. Mann–Whitney U-test was used for nonparametric measurements. RESULTS: Surgical field score and blood loss were better in D group than M group. Fentanyl consumption was less in D group than M group. Heart rate and mean atrial blood pressure were lower in D group except in the initial times than M group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, both drugs were effective in achieving hypotensive anesthesia in pediatrics; however, dexmedetomidine proved to have superior effect on the surgical field and blood loss compared to magnesium sulfate with no intra- and post-operative complications for cochlear implantation surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5735451/ /pubmed/29284876 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_72_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hassan, Passaint Fahim
Saleh, Amany Hassan
Dexmedetomidine versus Magnesium Sulfate in Anesthesia for Cochlear Implantation Surgery in Pediatric Patients
title Dexmedetomidine versus Magnesium Sulfate in Anesthesia for Cochlear Implantation Surgery in Pediatric Patients
title_full Dexmedetomidine versus Magnesium Sulfate in Anesthesia for Cochlear Implantation Surgery in Pediatric Patients
title_fullStr Dexmedetomidine versus Magnesium Sulfate in Anesthesia for Cochlear Implantation Surgery in Pediatric Patients
title_full_unstemmed Dexmedetomidine versus Magnesium Sulfate in Anesthesia for Cochlear Implantation Surgery in Pediatric Patients
title_short Dexmedetomidine versus Magnesium Sulfate in Anesthesia for Cochlear Implantation Surgery in Pediatric Patients
title_sort dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulfate in anesthesia for cochlear implantation surgery in pediatric patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284876
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_72_17
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanpassaintfahim dexmedetomidineversusmagnesiumsulfateinanesthesiaforcochlearimplantationsurgeryinpediatricpatients
AT salehamanyhassan dexmedetomidineversusmagnesiumsulfateinanesthesiaforcochlearimplantationsurgeryinpediatricpatients