Cargando…

A Comparison of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Neostigmine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intrathecal ropivacaine with or without neostigmine or dexmedetomidine in lower limb surgeries. Secondary objectives were to study the characteristics of block, duration of analgesia, postoperative analgesic requi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Ashutosh Kumar, Kumar, Abhyuday, Kumar, Ashok, Prasad, Braj Kishore, Tiwary, Pradeep Kumar, Kumar, Ranjeet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284861
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_62_17
_version_ 1783287218142445568
author Singh, Ashutosh Kumar
Kumar, Abhyuday
Kumar, Ashok
Prasad, Braj Kishore
Tiwary, Pradeep Kumar
Kumar, Ranjeet
author_facet Singh, Ashutosh Kumar
Kumar, Abhyuday
Kumar, Ashok
Prasad, Braj Kishore
Tiwary, Pradeep Kumar
Kumar, Ranjeet
author_sort Singh, Ashutosh Kumar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intrathecal ropivacaine with or without neostigmine or dexmedetomidine in lower limb surgeries. Secondary objectives were to study the characteristics of block, duration of analgesia, postoperative analgesic requirement, and associated side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients posted for elective orthopedic lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into three equal groups to receive intrathecal ropivacaine 0.5% alone (Group R), with adjuvant 5 μg dexmedetomidine (Group R + D) or 50 μg neostigmine (Group R + N). Time to achieve T10 sensory block, time to 2-segment regression, duration of regression to L4, maximum modified Bromage score and duration of analgesia were noted. The incidences of adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, desaturation, shivering, and itching were also noted. Statistical analysis was performed using two sample t-test for normally distributed variables and Pearson's Chi-squared test for categorical data. The level of significance was set as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Quality of motor and sensory blockage was significantly better in both Group R + D and Group R + N than Group R. Mean time to achieve T10 sensory block was lowest, time taken in regression of block by 2-segments and duration of regression to L4 was longest in Group R + D and was significant when compared to other groups. Adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting were highest in Group R + N and was statistically significant as compared to other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine is a better intrathecal adjuvant emerged as compared to neostigmine due to faster onset of anesthesia, better intra- and post-operative analgesia and prolonged duration of motor and sensory blockade without significant increase in adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5735500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57355002017-12-28 A Comparison of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Neostigmine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study Singh, Ashutosh Kumar Kumar, Abhyuday Kumar, Ashok Prasad, Braj Kishore Tiwary, Pradeep Kumar Kumar, Ranjeet Anesth Essays Res Original Article OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intrathecal ropivacaine with or without neostigmine or dexmedetomidine in lower limb surgeries. Secondary objectives were to study the characteristics of block, duration of analgesia, postoperative analgesic requirement, and associated side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients posted for elective orthopedic lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into three equal groups to receive intrathecal ropivacaine 0.5% alone (Group R), with adjuvant 5 μg dexmedetomidine (Group R + D) or 50 μg neostigmine (Group R + N). Time to achieve T10 sensory block, time to 2-segment regression, duration of regression to L4, maximum modified Bromage score and duration of analgesia were noted. The incidences of adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, desaturation, shivering, and itching were also noted. Statistical analysis was performed using two sample t-test for normally distributed variables and Pearson's Chi-squared test for categorical data. The level of significance was set as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Quality of motor and sensory blockage was significantly better in both Group R + D and Group R + N than Group R. Mean time to achieve T10 sensory block was lowest, time taken in regression of block by 2-segments and duration of regression to L4 was longest in Group R + D and was significant when compared to other groups. Adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting were highest in Group R + N and was statistically significant as compared to other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine is a better intrathecal adjuvant emerged as compared to neostigmine due to faster onset of anesthesia, better intra- and post-operative analgesia and prolonged duration of motor and sensory blockade without significant increase in adverse effects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5735500/ /pubmed/29284861 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_62_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Ashutosh Kumar
Kumar, Abhyuday
Kumar, Ashok
Prasad, Braj Kishore
Tiwary, Pradeep Kumar
Kumar, Ranjeet
A Comparison of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Neostigmine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study
title A Comparison of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Neostigmine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study
title_full A Comparison of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Neostigmine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr A Comparison of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Neostigmine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Neostigmine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study
title_short A Comparison of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Neostigmine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and neostigmine as adjuvant to ropivacaine for lower limb surgeries: a double-blind randomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284861
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_62_17
work_keys_str_mv AT singhashutoshkumar acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kumarabhyuday acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kumarashok acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT prasadbrajkishore acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT tiwarypradeepkumar acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kumarranjeet acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT singhashutoshkumar comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kumarabhyuday comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kumarashok comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT prasadbrajkishore comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT tiwarypradeepkumar comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kumarranjeet comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineandneostigmineasadjuvanttoropivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy