Cargando…

Accurately identifying patients who are excellent candidates or unsuitable for a medication: a novel approach

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether a unique analytic approach – as a proof of concept – could identify individual depressed outpatients (using 30 baseline clinical and demographic variables) who are very likely (75% certain) to not benefit (NB) or to remit (R), accepting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: South, Charles, Rush, A John, Carmody, Thomas J, Jha, Manish K, Trivedi, Madhukar H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29290685
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S139577
_version_ 1783287310394064896
author South, Charles
Rush, A John
Carmody, Thomas J
Jha, Manish K
Trivedi, Madhukar H
author_facet South, Charles
Rush, A John
Carmody, Thomas J
Jha, Manish K
Trivedi, Madhukar H
author_sort South, Charles
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether a unique analytic approach – as a proof of concept – could identify individual depressed outpatients (using 30 baseline clinical and demographic variables) who are very likely (75% certain) to not benefit (NB) or to remit (R), accepting that without sufficient certainty, no prediction (NP) would be made. METHODS: Patients from the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes trial treated with escitalopram (S-CIT) + placebo (n=212) or S-CIT + bupropion-SR (n=206) were analyzed separately to assess replicability. For each treatment, the elastic net was used to identify subsets of predictive baseline measures for R and NB, separately. Two different equations that estimate the likelihood of remission and no benefit were developed for each patient. The ratio of these two numbers characterized likely outcomes for each patient. RESULTS: The two treatment cells had comparable rates of remission (40%) and no benefit (22%). In S-CIT + bupropion-SR, 11 were predicted NB of which 82% were correct; 26 were predicted R – 85% correct (169 had NP). For S-CIT + placebo, 13 were predicted NB – 69% correct; 44 were predicted R – 75% correct (155 were NP). Overall, 94/418 (22%) patients were identified with a meaningful degree of certainty (69%–85% correct). Different variable sets with some overlap were predictive of remission and no benefit within and across treatments, despite comparable outcomes. CONCLUSION: In two separate analyses with two different treatments, this analytic approach – which is also applicable to pretreatment laboratory tests – identified a meaningful proportion (over 20%) of depressed patients for whom a treatment outcome was predicted with sufficient certainty that the clinician can elect to strongly recommend for or choose to avoid a particular treatment. Different persons seem to be remitting or not benefiting with these two different treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5735989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57359892017-12-29 Accurately identifying patients who are excellent candidates or unsuitable for a medication: a novel approach South, Charles Rush, A John Carmody, Thomas J Jha, Manish K Trivedi, Madhukar H Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether a unique analytic approach – as a proof of concept – could identify individual depressed outpatients (using 30 baseline clinical and demographic variables) who are very likely (75% certain) to not benefit (NB) or to remit (R), accepting that without sufficient certainty, no prediction (NP) would be made. METHODS: Patients from the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes trial treated with escitalopram (S-CIT) + placebo (n=212) or S-CIT + bupropion-SR (n=206) were analyzed separately to assess replicability. For each treatment, the elastic net was used to identify subsets of predictive baseline measures for R and NB, separately. Two different equations that estimate the likelihood of remission and no benefit were developed for each patient. The ratio of these two numbers characterized likely outcomes for each patient. RESULTS: The two treatment cells had comparable rates of remission (40%) and no benefit (22%). In S-CIT + bupropion-SR, 11 were predicted NB of which 82% were correct; 26 were predicted R – 85% correct (169 had NP). For S-CIT + placebo, 13 were predicted NB – 69% correct; 44 were predicted R – 75% correct (155 were NP). Overall, 94/418 (22%) patients were identified with a meaningful degree of certainty (69%–85% correct). Different variable sets with some overlap were predictive of remission and no benefit within and across treatments, despite comparable outcomes. CONCLUSION: In two separate analyses with two different treatments, this analytic approach – which is also applicable to pretreatment laboratory tests – identified a meaningful proportion (over 20%) of depressed patients for whom a treatment outcome was predicted with sufficient certainty that the clinician can elect to strongly recommend for or choose to avoid a particular treatment. Different persons seem to be remitting or not benefiting with these two different treatments. Dove Medical Press 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5735989/ /pubmed/29290685 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S139577 Text en © 2017 South et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
South, Charles
Rush, A John
Carmody, Thomas J
Jha, Manish K
Trivedi, Madhukar H
Accurately identifying patients who are excellent candidates or unsuitable for a medication: a novel approach
title Accurately identifying patients who are excellent candidates or unsuitable for a medication: a novel approach
title_full Accurately identifying patients who are excellent candidates or unsuitable for a medication: a novel approach
title_fullStr Accurately identifying patients who are excellent candidates or unsuitable for a medication: a novel approach
title_full_unstemmed Accurately identifying patients who are excellent candidates or unsuitable for a medication: a novel approach
title_short Accurately identifying patients who are excellent candidates or unsuitable for a medication: a novel approach
title_sort accurately identifying patients who are excellent candidates or unsuitable for a medication: a novel approach
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29290685
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S139577
work_keys_str_mv AT southcharles accuratelyidentifyingpatientswhoareexcellentcandidatesorunsuitableforamedicationanovelapproach
AT rushajohn accuratelyidentifyingpatientswhoareexcellentcandidatesorunsuitableforamedicationanovelapproach
AT carmodythomasj accuratelyidentifyingpatientswhoareexcellentcandidatesorunsuitableforamedicationanovelapproach
AT jhamanishk accuratelyidentifyingpatientswhoareexcellentcandidatesorunsuitableforamedicationanovelapproach
AT trivedimadhukarh accuratelyidentifyingpatientswhoareexcellentcandidatesorunsuitableforamedicationanovelapproach