Cargando…

Accuracy of recall of musculoskeletal injuries in elite military personnel: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Self-reported data are often used in research studies among military populations. OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of self-reported musculoskeletal injury data among elite military personnel was assessed for issues with recall. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Applied research laboratory a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lovalekar, Mita, Abt, John P, Sell, Timothy C, Lephart, Scott M, Pletcher, Erin, Beals, Kim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29247087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017434
_version_ 1783287316290207744
author Lovalekar, Mita
Abt, John P
Sell, Timothy C
Lephart, Scott M
Pletcher, Erin
Beals, Kim
author_facet Lovalekar, Mita
Abt, John P
Sell, Timothy C
Lephart, Scott M
Pletcher, Erin
Beals, Kim
author_sort Lovalekar, Mita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-reported data are often used in research studies among military populations. OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of self-reported musculoskeletal injury data among elite military personnel was assessed for issues with recall. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Applied research laboratory at a military installation. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 101 subjects participated (age 28.5±5.6 years). Study participants were active duty military personnel, with no conditions that precluded them from full duty. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported and medical record reviewed injuries that occurred during a 1-year period were matched by anatomic location, injury side (for extremity injuries), and injury year and type. The accuracy of recall was estimated as the per cent of medical record reviewed injuries correctly recalled in the self-report. The effect of injury anatomic location, injury type and severity and time since injury, on recall, was also assessed. Injuries were classified as recent (≤4 years since injury) or old injuries (>4 years since injury). Recall proportions were compared using Fisher’s exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 374 injuries were extracted from the subjects’ medical records. Recall was generally low (12.0%) and was not different between recent and old injuries (P=0.206). Injury location did not affect recall (P=0.418). Recall was higher for traumatic fractures as compared with less severe non-fracture injuries (P values 0.001 to <0.001). Recall for non-fracture injuries was higher for recent as compared with old injuries (P=0.033). This effect of time since injury on recall was not observed for fractures (P=0.522). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the importance of weighing the advantages and disadvantages of self-reported injury data before their use in research studies in military populations and the need for future research to identify modifiable factors that influence recall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5736038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57360382017-12-20 Accuracy of recall of musculoskeletal injuries in elite military personnel: a cross-sectional study Lovalekar, Mita Abt, John P Sell, Timothy C Lephart, Scott M Pletcher, Erin Beals, Kim BMJ Open Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Self-reported data are often used in research studies among military populations. OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of self-reported musculoskeletal injury data among elite military personnel was assessed for issues with recall. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Applied research laboratory at a military installation. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 101 subjects participated (age 28.5±5.6 years). Study participants were active duty military personnel, with no conditions that precluded them from full duty. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported and medical record reviewed injuries that occurred during a 1-year period were matched by anatomic location, injury side (for extremity injuries), and injury year and type. The accuracy of recall was estimated as the per cent of medical record reviewed injuries correctly recalled in the self-report. The effect of injury anatomic location, injury type and severity and time since injury, on recall, was also assessed. Injuries were classified as recent (≤4 years since injury) or old injuries (>4 years since injury). Recall proportions were compared using Fisher’s exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 374 injuries were extracted from the subjects’ medical records. Recall was generally low (12.0%) and was not different between recent and old injuries (P=0.206). Injury location did not affect recall (P=0.418). Recall was higher for traumatic fractures as compared with less severe non-fracture injuries (P values 0.001 to <0.001). Recall for non-fracture injuries was higher for recent as compared with old injuries (P=0.033). This effect of time since injury on recall was not observed for fractures (P=0.522). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the importance of weighing the advantages and disadvantages of self-reported injury data before their use in research studies in military populations and the need for future research to identify modifiable factors that influence recall. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5736038/ /pubmed/29247087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017434 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Lovalekar, Mita
Abt, John P
Sell, Timothy C
Lephart, Scott M
Pletcher, Erin
Beals, Kim
Accuracy of recall of musculoskeletal injuries in elite military personnel: a cross-sectional study
title Accuracy of recall of musculoskeletal injuries in elite military personnel: a cross-sectional study
title_full Accuracy of recall of musculoskeletal injuries in elite military personnel: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Accuracy of recall of musculoskeletal injuries in elite military personnel: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of recall of musculoskeletal injuries in elite military personnel: a cross-sectional study
title_short Accuracy of recall of musculoskeletal injuries in elite military personnel: a cross-sectional study
title_sort accuracy of recall of musculoskeletal injuries in elite military personnel: a cross-sectional study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29247087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017434
work_keys_str_mv AT lovalekarmita accuracyofrecallofmusculoskeletalinjuriesinelitemilitarypersonnelacrosssectionalstudy
AT abtjohnp accuracyofrecallofmusculoskeletalinjuriesinelitemilitarypersonnelacrosssectionalstudy
AT selltimothyc accuracyofrecallofmusculoskeletalinjuriesinelitemilitarypersonnelacrosssectionalstudy
AT lephartscottm accuracyofrecallofmusculoskeletalinjuriesinelitemilitarypersonnelacrosssectionalstudy
AT pletchererin accuracyofrecallofmusculoskeletalinjuriesinelitemilitarypersonnelacrosssectionalstudy
AT bealskim accuracyofrecallofmusculoskeletalinjuriesinelitemilitarypersonnelacrosssectionalstudy