Cargando…

Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study

OBJECTIVES: This study was carried out to improve patient safety in the operating theatre by the introduction of perioperative briefing and debriefing, which focused on an optimal collaboration between surgical team members. DESIGN: A prospective intervention study with one pretest and two post-test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leong, Katharina Brigitte Margarethe Siew Lan, Hanskamp-Sebregts, Mirelle, van der Wal, Raymond A, Wolff, Andre P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29247103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018367
_version_ 1783287317959540736
author Leong, Katharina Brigitte Margarethe Siew Lan
Hanskamp-Sebregts, Mirelle
van der Wal, Raymond A
Wolff, Andre P
author_facet Leong, Katharina Brigitte Margarethe Siew Lan
Hanskamp-Sebregts, Mirelle
van der Wal, Raymond A
Wolff, Andre P
author_sort Leong, Katharina Brigitte Margarethe Siew Lan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study was carried out to improve patient safety in the operating theatre by the introduction of perioperative briefing and debriefing, which focused on an optimal collaboration between surgical team members. DESIGN: A prospective intervention study with one pretest and two post-test measurements: 1 month before and 4 months and 2.5 years after the implementation of perioperative briefing and debriefing, respectively. SETTING: Operating theatres of a tertiary care hospital with 875 beds in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: All members of five surgical teams participated in the perioperative briefing and debriefing. INTERVENTION: The implementation of perioperative briefing and debriefing from July 2012 to January 2014. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was changes in the team climate, measured by the Team Climate Inventory. Secondary outcomes were the experiences of surgical teams with perioperative briefing and debriefing, measured with a structured questionnaire, and the duration of the briefings, measured by an independent observer. RESULTS: Two and a half years after the introduction of perioperative briefing and debriefing, the team climate increased statistically significant (p≤0.05). Members of the five surgical teams strongly agreed with the positive influence of perioperative briefing and debriefing on clear agreements and reminding one another of the agreements of the day. They perceived a higher efficiency of the surgical programme with more operations starting on time and less unexpectedly long operation time. The perioperative briefing took less than 4 min to conduct. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative briefing and debriefing improved the team climate of surgical teams and the efficiency of their work within the operating theatre with acceptable duration per briefing. Surgical teams with alternating team compositions have the most benefit of briefing and debriefing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5736045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57360452017-12-20 Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study Leong, Katharina Brigitte Margarethe Siew Lan Hanskamp-Sebregts, Mirelle van der Wal, Raymond A Wolff, Andre P BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: This study was carried out to improve patient safety in the operating theatre by the introduction of perioperative briefing and debriefing, which focused on an optimal collaboration between surgical team members. DESIGN: A prospective intervention study with one pretest and two post-test measurements: 1 month before and 4 months and 2.5 years after the implementation of perioperative briefing and debriefing, respectively. SETTING: Operating theatres of a tertiary care hospital with 875 beds in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: All members of five surgical teams participated in the perioperative briefing and debriefing. INTERVENTION: The implementation of perioperative briefing and debriefing from July 2012 to January 2014. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was changes in the team climate, measured by the Team Climate Inventory. Secondary outcomes were the experiences of surgical teams with perioperative briefing and debriefing, measured with a structured questionnaire, and the duration of the briefings, measured by an independent observer. RESULTS: Two and a half years after the introduction of perioperative briefing and debriefing, the team climate increased statistically significant (p≤0.05). Members of the five surgical teams strongly agreed with the positive influence of perioperative briefing and debriefing on clear agreements and reminding one another of the agreements of the day. They perceived a higher efficiency of the surgical programme with more operations starting on time and less unexpectedly long operation time. The perioperative briefing took less than 4 min to conduct. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative briefing and debriefing improved the team climate of surgical teams and the efficiency of their work within the operating theatre with acceptable duration per briefing. Surgical teams with alternating team compositions have the most benefit of briefing and debriefing. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5736045/ /pubmed/29247103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018367 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Leong, Katharina Brigitte Margarethe Siew Lan
Hanskamp-Sebregts, Mirelle
van der Wal, Raymond A
Wolff, Andre P
Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study
title Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study
title_full Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study
title_fullStr Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study
title_short Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study
title_sort effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29247103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018367
work_keys_str_mv AT leongkatharinabrigittemargarethesiewlan effectsofperioperativebriefinganddebriefingonpatientsafetyaprospectiveinterventionstudy
AT hanskampsebregtsmirelle effectsofperioperativebriefinganddebriefingonpatientsafetyaprospectiveinterventionstudy
AT vanderwalraymonda effectsofperioperativebriefinganddebriefingonpatientsafetyaprospectiveinterventionstudy
AT wolffandrep effectsofperioperativebriefinganddebriefingonpatientsafetyaprospectiveinterventionstudy