Cargando…

A cross-sectional study using freedom of information requests to evaluate variation in local authority commissioning of community pharmacy public health services in England

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to provide a national picture of the extent and nature of public health services commissioned by local authorities (LAs) from community pharmacies across England in financial year 2014/15. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of public health services commissioned in community...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mackridge, Adam John, Gray, Nicola Jane, Krska, Janet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28698329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015511
_version_ 1783287322476806144
author Mackridge, Adam John
Gray, Nicola Jane
Krska, Janet
author_facet Mackridge, Adam John
Gray, Nicola Jane
Krska, Janet
author_sort Mackridge, Adam John
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to provide a national picture of the extent and nature of public health services commissioned by local authorities (LAs) from community pharmacies across England in financial year 2014/15. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of public health services commissioned in community pharmacies by LAs, gathered via freedom of information requests and documentary analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All 152 LAs in England. RESULTS: A total of 833 commissioned services were reported across England (range 3–10 per LA). Four services were commissioned by over 90% of LAs: emergency hormonal contraception (EHC), smoking cessation support, supervised consumption of methadone or other opiates and needle and syringe programmes (NSPs). The proportion of pharmacies commissioned to deliver these services varied considerably between LAs from <10% to 100%. This variation was not related to differences in relevant proxy measures of need. NHS Health Checks and alcohol screening and brief advice were commissioned by fewer LAs (32% and 15%, respectively), again with no relationship to relevant measures of need. A range of other services were commissioned less frequently, by fewer than 10% of LAs. Supervised consumption and NSPs were the most frequently used services, with over 4.4 million individual supervisions and over 1.4 million needle packs supplied. Pharmacies provided over 200 000 consultations for supply of EHC, over 30 000 supplies of free condoms and almost 16 000 chlamydia screening kits. More than 55 000 people registered to stop smoking in a community pharmacy, almost 30 000 were screened for alcohol use and over 26 000 NHS Health Checks were delivered. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in commissioning and delivery of public health services in community pharmacies across England, which correlate poorly with potential benefit to local populations. Research to ascertain reasons for this variation is needed to ensure that future commissioning and delivery of these services matches local need.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5736088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57360882017-12-20 A cross-sectional study using freedom of information requests to evaluate variation in local authority commissioning of community pharmacy public health services in England Mackridge, Adam John Gray, Nicola Jane Krska, Janet BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: This study aims to provide a national picture of the extent and nature of public health services commissioned by local authorities (LAs) from community pharmacies across England in financial year 2014/15. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of public health services commissioned in community pharmacies by LAs, gathered via freedom of information requests and documentary analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All 152 LAs in England. RESULTS: A total of 833 commissioned services were reported across England (range 3–10 per LA). Four services were commissioned by over 90% of LAs: emergency hormonal contraception (EHC), smoking cessation support, supervised consumption of methadone or other opiates and needle and syringe programmes (NSPs). The proportion of pharmacies commissioned to deliver these services varied considerably between LAs from <10% to 100%. This variation was not related to differences in relevant proxy measures of need. NHS Health Checks and alcohol screening and brief advice were commissioned by fewer LAs (32% and 15%, respectively), again with no relationship to relevant measures of need. A range of other services were commissioned less frequently, by fewer than 10% of LAs. Supervised consumption and NSPs were the most frequently used services, with over 4.4 million individual supervisions and over 1.4 million needle packs supplied. Pharmacies provided over 200 000 consultations for supply of EHC, over 30 000 supplies of free condoms and almost 16 000 chlamydia screening kits. More than 55 000 people registered to stop smoking in a community pharmacy, almost 30 000 were screened for alcohol use and over 26 000 NHS Health Checks were delivered. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in commissioning and delivery of public health services in community pharmacies across England, which correlate poorly with potential benefit to local populations. Research to ascertain reasons for this variation is needed to ensure that future commissioning and delivery of these services matches local need. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5736088/ /pubmed/28698329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015511 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Mackridge, Adam John
Gray, Nicola Jane
Krska, Janet
A cross-sectional study using freedom of information requests to evaluate variation in local authority commissioning of community pharmacy public health services in England
title A cross-sectional study using freedom of information requests to evaluate variation in local authority commissioning of community pharmacy public health services in England
title_full A cross-sectional study using freedom of information requests to evaluate variation in local authority commissioning of community pharmacy public health services in England
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study using freedom of information requests to evaluate variation in local authority commissioning of community pharmacy public health services in England
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study using freedom of information requests to evaluate variation in local authority commissioning of community pharmacy public health services in England
title_short A cross-sectional study using freedom of information requests to evaluate variation in local authority commissioning of community pharmacy public health services in England
title_sort cross-sectional study using freedom of information requests to evaluate variation in local authority commissioning of community pharmacy public health services in england
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28698329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015511
work_keys_str_mv AT mackridgeadamjohn acrosssectionalstudyusingfreedomofinformationrequeststoevaluatevariationinlocalauthoritycommissioningofcommunitypharmacypublichealthservicesinengland
AT graynicolajane acrosssectionalstudyusingfreedomofinformationrequeststoevaluatevariationinlocalauthoritycommissioningofcommunitypharmacypublichealthservicesinengland
AT krskajanet acrosssectionalstudyusingfreedomofinformationrequeststoevaluatevariationinlocalauthoritycommissioningofcommunitypharmacypublichealthservicesinengland
AT mackridgeadamjohn crosssectionalstudyusingfreedomofinformationrequeststoevaluatevariationinlocalauthoritycommissioningofcommunitypharmacypublichealthservicesinengland
AT graynicolajane crosssectionalstudyusingfreedomofinformationrequeststoevaluatevariationinlocalauthoritycommissioningofcommunitypharmacypublichealthservicesinengland
AT krskajanet crosssectionalstudyusingfreedomofinformationrequeststoevaluatevariationinlocalauthoritycommissioningofcommunitypharmacypublichealthservicesinengland