Cargando…

Comparative study of impaction and sedimentation in an aerosol chamber using defined fungal spore and bacterial concentrations

Biocontamination control is a very significant part of the manufacturing process of sterile drugs. Sterility is frequently monitored by active or passive air sampling measurements, but there are no specific rules as to how this is to be done. This study tested air sampling methods of active impactio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haas, Doris, Galler, Herbert, Fritz, Carola, Hasler, Christina, Habib, Juliana, Reinthaler, Franz F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187039
_version_ 1783287329269481472
author Haas, Doris
Galler, Herbert
Fritz, Carola
Hasler, Christina
Habib, Juliana
Reinthaler, Franz F.
author_facet Haas, Doris
Galler, Herbert
Fritz, Carola
Hasler, Christina
Habib, Juliana
Reinthaler, Franz F.
author_sort Haas, Doris
collection PubMed
description Biocontamination control is a very significant part of the manufacturing process of sterile drugs. Sterility is frequently monitored by active or passive air sampling measurements, but there are no specific rules as to how this is to be done. This study tested air sampling methods of active impaction and passive sedimentation under standardized conditions. Aspergillus niger (A. niger) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were selected in this experiment to examine parallels, correlations and differences between the two methods. The results show that the number of colony forming units per plate (CFU/plate) was higher for A. niger in the active method, whereas for S. aureus it was higher in the sedimentation method. A high correlation coefficient was found between the impaction and sedimentation methods for A. niger. For S. aureus, depending on the culture media used and the time for passive air sampling, a larger number of CFU/plate was found than in active air sampling. This study concludes that active and passive air sampling can be used for monitoring the air in clean rooms. For fungal spore detection, the impaction is more efficient, as it is possible to sample a higher volume of air in a shorter period of time, whereas the optimal measurement methods for S. aureus depend on a number of factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5736173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57361732017-12-22 Comparative study of impaction and sedimentation in an aerosol chamber using defined fungal spore and bacterial concentrations Haas, Doris Galler, Herbert Fritz, Carola Hasler, Christina Habib, Juliana Reinthaler, Franz F. PLoS One Research Article Biocontamination control is a very significant part of the manufacturing process of sterile drugs. Sterility is frequently monitored by active or passive air sampling measurements, but there are no specific rules as to how this is to be done. This study tested air sampling methods of active impaction and passive sedimentation under standardized conditions. Aspergillus niger (A. niger) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were selected in this experiment to examine parallels, correlations and differences between the two methods. The results show that the number of colony forming units per plate (CFU/plate) was higher for A. niger in the active method, whereas for S. aureus it was higher in the sedimentation method. A high correlation coefficient was found between the impaction and sedimentation methods for A. niger. For S. aureus, depending on the culture media used and the time for passive air sampling, a larger number of CFU/plate was found than in active air sampling. This study concludes that active and passive air sampling can be used for monitoring the air in clean rooms. For fungal spore detection, the impaction is more efficient, as it is possible to sample a higher volume of air in a shorter period of time, whereas the optimal measurement methods for S. aureus depend on a number of factors. Public Library of Science 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5736173/ /pubmed/29261663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187039 Text en © 2017 Haas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haas, Doris
Galler, Herbert
Fritz, Carola
Hasler, Christina
Habib, Juliana
Reinthaler, Franz F.
Comparative study of impaction and sedimentation in an aerosol chamber using defined fungal spore and bacterial concentrations
title Comparative study of impaction and sedimentation in an aerosol chamber using defined fungal spore and bacterial concentrations
title_full Comparative study of impaction and sedimentation in an aerosol chamber using defined fungal spore and bacterial concentrations
title_fullStr Comparative study of impaction and sedimentation in an aerosol chamber using defined fungal spore and bacterial concentrations
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of impaction and sedimentation in an aerosol chamber using defined fungal spore and bacterial concentrations
title_short Comparative study of impaction and sedimentation in an aerosol chamber using defined fungal spore and bacterial concentrations
title_sort comparative study of impaction and sedimentation in an aerosol chamber using defined fungal spore and bacterial concentrations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5736173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187039
work_keys_str_mv AT haasdoris comparativestudyofimpactionandsedimentationinanaerosolchamberusingdefinedfungalsporeandbacterialconcentrations
AT gallerherbert comparativestudyofimpactionandsedimentationinanaerosolchamberusingdefinedfungalsporeandbacterialconcentrations
AT fritzcarola comparativestudyofimpactionandsedimentationinanaerosolchamberusingdefinedfungalsporeandbacterialconcentrations
AT haslerchristina comparativestudyofimpactionandsedimentationinanaerosolchamberusingdefinedfungalsporeandbacterialconcentrations
AT habibjuliana comparativestudyofimpactionandsedimentationinanaerosolchamberusingdefinedfungalsporeandbacterialconcentrations
AT reinthalerfranzf comparativestudyofimpactionandsedimentationinanaerosolchamberusingdefinedfungalsporeandbacterialconcentrations